How do investors' expectations drive asset prices?



conditional expectations of investors about a future cash flow. Thus, this
process describes all the information available to the investors. We focus on
the question how the asset price process is depending on the characteristics
of such an information process
I while we take the information process as
given.

We consider a market with the given time horizon T > 0 and the two
dimensional standard Brownian motion
W = {(W/, W)) : t ∈ [0,T]} on a
given probability space (Ω, P, Pt,
P) where (Pt)t ejor∣ is the filtration gener-
ated by W augmented by all the
P -null sets, with P = Pτ. The information
process I is defined on this probability space. As already mentioned, this
process is assumed to represent investors’ expectations about the future cash
flow paid to the shareholder of a company. We assume that this strictly
positive dividend is paid only in T. Since investors are assumed to act to-
tally rational,
It is a positive P-martingale and hence admits the following
representation3

It = Io +


I I.dw’ + <

Jo


dWsv)


(1)


The martingale representation theorem provides that there exist two processes
σ1t and σf,v. By this theorem one only knows that these processes are adapted

= 1 and P (Jθr 1ay}2 ds < ∞) = 1.


(∕0r (p1s )2 ds < ∞)


to Pt and that P


In the following we make the assumption σf, = = 0 for all t ∈ [0, T] and we
require a special characterization of σ{. Of course, with these assumptions
we assume a special representation of
It. Later we will give some economic
arguments for this special representation.

In the remainder of this paper we assume that the volatility σ1t of the
information process is governed by the following stochastic differential equa-
tion:

σt = σo + [ b(s,IsPs) ds + σ σv(s,Is,^a) dw' , 0 t t,    (2)

Jo                 Jo

where b is the drift and σv describes the volatility of σ1t (these two functions
are assumed to be deterministic). Since
It represents investors’ expecta-
tions in t about the value of the asset in T, the process
It and the forward

3See for example Karatzas and Shreve [22].



More intriguing information

1. What Drives the Productive Efficiency of a Firm?: The Importance of Industry, Location, R&D, and Size
2. Mortality study of 18 000 patients treated with omeprazole
3. The name is absent
4. The effect of classroom diversity on tolerance and participation in England, Sweden and Germany
5. 5th and 8th grade pupils’ and teachers’ perceptions of the relationships between teaching methods, classroom ethos, and positive affective attitudes towards learning mathematics in Japan
6. Measuring Semantic Similarity by Latent Relational Analysis
7. Markets for Influence
8. The mental map of Dutch entrepreneurs. Changes in the subjective rating of locations in the Netherlands, 1983-1993-2003
9. Tax systems and tax reforms in Europe: Rationale and open issue for more radical reforms
10. A Consistent Nonparametric Test for Causality in Quantile