Table 5: Estimation Results including Interaction Terms
3 SLS |
(1 a) |
(2 a) |
(За) |
log(cape×) |
-0.068 * |
ɪæi |
-0.049 * |
( 0.035 ) |
( 0.015 ) |
( 0.028 ) | |
log (weighted av. capex) |
-0.086 “ |
-0.035 |
-0.055 * |
( 0.039 ) |
( 0.016 ) |
( 0.030 ) | |
log(market share) |
-0.155 *“ |
-0.119 *“ |
-0.148 *“ |
( 0.035 ) |
( 0.015 ) |
( 0.027 ) | |
log(market size) |
0.702 *“ |
-0.032 |
0.171 |
( 0.270 ) |
( 0.091 ) |
( 0.171 ) | |
log(share urban pop.) |
19.534 ** |
-14.156 *“ |
-8.646 * |
( 9.028 ) |
( 2.292 ) |
( 4.424 ) | |
cb. reg. × log(cape×) |
-0.086 “ |
-0.074 | |
( 0.062 ) |
( 0.053 ) | ||
inc. reg. × log(cape×) |
-0.002 |
0.014 | |
(0.018 ) |
( 0.035 ) | ||
netm. reg. × log(cape×) |
0.037 |
0.052 “ |
0.071 |
( 0.059 ) |
( 0.025 ) |
( 0.049 ) | |
cb. reg. × |
0.108 * |
0.079 | |
log(weighted av. capex) |
( 0.061 ) |
( 0.053 ) | |
inc. reg. × |
0.008 |
-0.002 | |
log(weighted av. capex) |
( 0.018 ) |
( 0.035 ) | |
netm. reg. × |
-0.048 |
-0.078 *“ |
-0.092 |
log(weighted av.capex) |
( 0.061 ) |
( 0.026 ) |
( 0.050 ) |
GSM 1800 |
0.239 *“ |
0.109 *“ |
0 122 *** |
(0.066 ) |
( 0.020 ) |
( 0.039 ) | |
constant |
-27.266 *“ |
— |
— |
( 9.066 ) |
— |
— | |
country dummies included | |||
#Ôbsï |
318 |
421 |
500 |
Chi2 (df) |
3672.04 (26) |
145092.42 (27) |
46628.15 (30) |
"R2"___________________ |
0.920 |
0.988 |
0.951 |
3SLS |
(1 b) |
(2 b) |
(3 b) |
Iog(cape×) |
Ô"ÔÔ2 |
-0.007 |
√Γ∞8 |
( 0.012 ) |
( 0.011 ) |
(0.015 ) | |
log (weighted av. capex) |
0.040 *“ |
0.025 “ |
0.034 “ |
( 0.014 ) |
( 0.012 ) |
(0.016 ) | |
log(term. rate) |
-0.380 *“ |
-0.150 *“ |
-0.252 |
( 0.130 ) |
( 0.045 ) |
(0.156 ) | |
log(market share) |
0.939 *“ |
0.928 *“ |
0.944 *“ |
( 0.020 ) |
( 0.018 ) |
(0.025 ) | |
log(market size) |
-0.004 |
0.333 *“ |
0.120 |
( 0.075 ) |
( 0.071 ) |
(0.078 ) | |
log(share urban pop.) |
-10.987 *** |
-5.712 *“ |
-9.042 *“ |
( 1.767 ) |
(2.143 ) |
(1.582 ) | |
post paid |
0.000 *“ |
0.000 *“ |
0.000 *“ |
( 0.000 ) |
( 0.000 ) |
(0.000 ) | |
cb. reg. × log(cape×) |
-0.028 |
-0.020 | |
( 0.019 ) |
(0.027 ) | ||
inc. reg. × log(cape×) |
-0.004 |
0.002 | |
( 0.015 ) |
(0.016 ) | ||
netm. reg. × log(cape×) |
0.015 |
-0.016 |
0.012 |
( 0.021 ) |
( 0.017 ) |
(0.025 ) | |
cb. reg. × |
0.023 |
0.019 | |
log(weighted av. capex) |
( 0.019 ) |
(0.027 ) | |
inc. reg. × |
0.014 |
0.007 | |
log(weighted av. capex) |
( 0.015 ) |
(0.167 ) | |
netm. reg. × |
-0.007 |
0.016 |
-0.000 |
log(weighted av.cape×) |
( 0.023 ) |
(0.018 ) |
(0.027 ) |
constant |
1.646 “ |
— |
-0.944 * |
( 0.685 ) |
— |
(1.219 ) | |
country dummies included | |||
___________year dummies included___________ | |||
#Ôbsï |
500 |
318 |
421 |
Chi2 (df) |
12866.44 (30) |
1050000(28) |
12571.74 (27) |
"R2"___________________ |
0.963 |
0.983 |
0.963 |
*** ** * sjg∩a∣ the 1,5 and 10 percent significance levels.
Std. errors are provided in brackets.
More intriguing information
1. WP 1 - The first part-time economy in the world. Does it work?2. Behavior-Based Early Language Development on a Humanoid Robot
3. A methodological approach in order to support decision-makers when defining Mobility and Transportation Politics
4. The Composition of Government Spending and the Real Exchange Rate
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Subduing High Inflation in Romania. How to Better Monetary and Exchange Rate Mechanisms?
10. Keynesian Dynamics and the Wage-Price Spiral:Estimating a Baseline Disequilibrium Approach