Prizes and Patents: Using Market Signals to Provide Incentives for Innovations



A. Implementing ex-post efficient allocation

Let 0 denote the report made by the innovator and 5(0) the recommendation by the mech-
anism to incur the fixed cost
K. (Recall that if the cost is not incurred, the innovator produces a
good of quality 0.) After the innovator produces the good, the competitor must submit a report of
the quality of the good. The competitor only observes the quality of the good produced. Let
0c
denote the report made by the competitor. A mechanism consists of reports made by the innovator
and the competitor and outcome functions 5(0), τ(0, 0
c), T(0, 0c), Tc(0, 0c), where 5(0) denotes the
recommendation by the mechanism to incur the cost K ; τ (0, 0
c) denotes the length of the patent;
T(0, 0
c) denotes the prize to the innovator; and Tc(0, 0c) denotes transfer to the competitor.

The payoffs to the innovator induced by the mechanism are then given by

V(0, 0, 0c (y) , y) = 5(0) [τ(0, 0-0 - -K + T(0, 0c)] .                   (7)

In this formulation of the payoff to the innovator, V(0,0, 0c (y) , y), the arguments are, in
order, the true type of the quality of the good 0, the report by the innovator 0, the report by the
competitor 0
c (y), and the decision of the innovator y to incur the cost K. The payoffs to the
competitor are given by T
c (0, 0c).

The incentive compatibility constraint for the innovator is given by

V(0,0,0,5 (0)) max V(0,0,0,5 (0)).                            (8)

e[o,e]                   v 7

Note that in this incentive compatibility constraint we have assumed that the competitor
reveals the information truthfully. This formulation of the incentive compatibility constraint fol-
lows from the revelation principle that states that the Bayesian equilibrium of any game can be
implemented as a truth-telling equilibrium of a direct mechanism.

The incentive compatibility constraint for the competitor is given by

^c

Tc (0,0) Tc(0,0 ).

An interim-efficient and the ex post efficient mechanisms are defined in the analogous way as
in the above. Note that since ex post efficiency assumes that the planner has the same information
as the private agents, the ex post efficient outcomes in the environment with and without market
signals are identical.

11



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Imitation in location choice
3. THE CHANGING RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
4. Towards Teaching a Robot to Count Objects
5. The Impact of Individual Investment Behavior for Retirement Welfare: Evidence from the United States and Germany
6. The name is absent
7. A Critical Examination of the Beliefs about Learning a Foreign Language at Primary School
8. A Hybrid Neural Network and Virtual Reality System for Spatial Language Processing
9. A methodological approach in order to support decision-makers when defining Mobility and Transportation Politics
10. The name is absent