Table 4
Granger causality test results for industrial property
Δ tbi |
Δ reit |
Explanatory variable |
ΔD |
Adj. RP2P | ||
ΔIRN |
Δ S |
Δ SE | ||||
Pairwise model | ||||||
■g ω Δ ind_tbi .52 |
.00 |
.54 | ||||
■8 5 Δ ind reit .07 eg — о Й |
.45 |
.56 | ||||
Multiple variable model | ||||||
Δ indtbi .20 |
.00 |
.26 |
.99 |
.97 |
.91 |
.54 |
Δ ind reit .19 |
.34 |
.80 |
.53 |
.07 |
.11 |
.61 |
The table shows the p-values in the tests. The null hypothesis is that of no Granger causality between the
variables. The models include one lag and two dummy variables that take the value one in a single period
(1995Q2, 2008Q4) and are zero otherwise.
Table 5 Granger causality test results for offices
Δ tbi |
Δ reit |
Explanatory variable |
ΔD |
Adj. RP2P | |||
ΔIRN |
Δ S |
Δ SE | |||||
Pairwise model | |||||||
й O <υ əa й S |
Δ of_tbi .00 |
.03 |
.22 | ||||
Δ ofreit .92 |
.00 |
.32 | |||||
Multiple variable model Δ of_tbi .14 |
.00 |
.02 |
.22 |
.58 |
.03 |
.28 | |
Δ ofreit .70 |
.40 |
.70 |
.50 |
.07 |
.12 |
36 |
The table shows the p-values in the tests. The null hypothesis is that of no Granger causality between the
variables. The models include one lag and one dummy variable that takes the value one in a single period
(2008Q4) and is zero otherwise.
Table 6 Granger causality test results for retail property
Explanatory variable |
Adj RP2P | |||||||||
Δ tbi |
Δ reit |
INF |
ΔIR |
Δ S |
Δ SE |
ΔD |
Δ GDP | |||
O ð S Q |
Pairwise model | |||||||||
Δ retbi Δ re reit |
.15 .96 |
.07 .00 |
.41 .34 | |||||||
Multiple variable model | ||||||||||
Δ retbi |
.28 |
.04 |
.08 |
.64 |
.21 |
.04 |
.31 |
.01 |
.47 | |
Δ re reit |
.39 |
.50 |
.14 |
.58 |
.19 |
.51 |
.01 |
.09 |
.46 |
The table shows the p-values in the tests. The null hypothesis is that of no Granger causality between the
variables. The models include one lag and two dummy variables that take the value one in a single period
(1995Q2, 2008Q4) and are zero otherwise. Due to heteroscedasticity of the residuals in the model for Δrereit,
the p-values for Δ rereit in the multiple variable model are based on a covariance matrix that is computed
allowing for heteroscedasticity as in White (1980).
28
More intriguing information
1. sycnoιogιcaι spaces2. Strategic monetary policy in a monetary union with non-atomistic wage setters
3. Globalization, Redistribution, and the Composition of Public Education Expenditures
4. How Low Business Tax Rates Attract Multinational Headquarters: Municipality-Level Evidence from Germany
5. Parallel and overlapping Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Hepatitis B and C virus Infections among pregnant women in the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria
6. The Challenge of Urban Regeneration in Deprived European Neighbourhoods - a Partnership Approach
7. Estimated Open Economy New Keynesian Phillips Curves for the G7
8. Dual Track Reforms: With and Without Losers
9. Social Cohesion as a Real-life Phenomenon: Exploring the Validity of the Universalist and Particularist Perspectives
10. Land Police in Mozambique: Future Perspectives