Response speeds of direct and securitized real estate to shocks in the fundamentals



Table 4


Granger causality test results for industrial property

Δ tbi

Δ reit

Explanatory variable

ΔD

Adj. RP2P

ΔIRN

Δ S

Δ SE

Pairwise model

■g ω Δ ind_tbi                 .52

.00

.54

■8 5 Δ ind reit               .07

eg    —

о Й
C‰ cs
ω ≥

.45

.56

Multiple variable model

Δ indtbi               .20

.00

.26

.99

.97

.91

.54

Δ ind reit                .19

.34

.80

.53

.07

.11

.61

The table shows the p-values in the tests. The null hypothesis is that of no Granger causality between the
variables. The models include one lag and two dummy variables that take the value one in a single period
(1995Q2, 2008Q4) and are zero otherwise.

Table 5 Granger causality test results for offices

Δ tbi

Δ reit

Explanatory variable

ΔD

Adj. RP2P

ΔIRN

Δ S

Δ SE

Pairwise model

й O

<υ əa

й S
о Й
C‰ cs
Q>

Δ of_tbi                  .00

.03

.22

Δ ofreit                .92

.00

.32

Multiple variable model

Δ of_tbi                   .14

.00

.02

.22

.58

.03

.28

Δ ofreit                .70

.40

.70

.50

.07

.12

36

The table shows the p-values in the tests. The null hypothesis is that of no Granger causality between the
variables. The models include one lag and one dummy variable that takes the value one in a single period
(2008Q4) and is zero otherwise.

Table 6 Granger causality test results for retail property

Explanatory variable

Adj

RP2P

Δ tbi

Δ reit

INF

ΔIR

Δ S

Δ SE

ΔD

Δ GDP

O

ð S
ω 'C
C‰ aS

Q

Pairwise model

Δ retbi

Δ re reit

.15

.96

.07

.00

.41

.34

Multiple variable model

Δ retbi

.28

.04

.08

.64

.21

.04

.31

.01

.47

Δ re reit

.39

.50

.14

.58

.19

.51

.01

.09

.46

The table shows the p-values in the tests. The null hypothesis is that of no Granger causality between the
variables. The models include one lag and two dummy variables that take the value one in a single period
(1995Q2, 2008Q4) and are zero otherwise. Due to heteroscedasticity of the residuals in the model for Δ
rereit,
the p-values for Δ rereit in the multiple variable model are based on a covariance matrix that is computed
allowing for heteroscedasticity as in White (1980).

28



More intriguing information

1. Do imputed education histories provide satisfactory results in fertility analysis in the Western German context?
2. The name is absent
3. Personal Income Tax Elasticity in Turkey: 1975-2005
4. PER UNIT COSTS TO OWN AND OPERATE FARM MACHINERY
5. Large Scale Studies in den deutschen Sozialwissenschaften:Stand und Perspektiven. Bericht über einen Workshop der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft
6. How to do things without words: Infants, utterance-activity and distributed cognition.
7. The Making of Cultural Policy: A European Perspective
8. The Value of Cultural Heritage Sites in Armenia: Evidence From a Travel Cost Method Study
9. Fiscal federalism and Fiscal Autonomy: Lessons for the UK from other Industrialised Countries
10. The name is absent
11. Implementation of the Ordinal Shapley Value for a three-agent economy
12. Ruptures in the probability scale. Calculation of ruptures’ values
13. The name is absent
14. Robust Econometrics
15. Imperfect competition and congestion in the City
16. The name is absent
17. Electricity output in Spain: Economic analysis of the activity after liberalization
18. Public Debt Management in Brazil
19. EMU's Decentralized System of Fiscal Policy
20. Legal Minimum Wages and the Wages of Formal and Informal Sector Workers in Costa Rica