Response speeds of direct and securitized real estate to shocks in the fundamentals



Table 4


Granger causality test results for industrial property

Δ tbi

Δ reit

Explanatory variable

ΔD

Adj. RP2P

ΔIRN

Δ S

Δ SE

Pairwise model

■g ω Δ ind_tbi                 .52

.00

.54

■8 5 Δ ind reit               .07

eg    —

о Й
C‰ cs
ω ≥

.45

.56

Multiple variable model

Δ indtbi               .20

.00

.26

.99

.97

.91

.54

Δ ind reit                .19

.34

.80

.53

.07

.11

.61

The table shows the p-values in the tests. The null hypothesis is that of no Granger causality between the
variables. The models include one lag and two dummy variables that take the value one in a single period
(1995Q2, 2008Q4) and are zero otherwise.

Table 5 Granger causality test results for offices

Δ tbi

Δ reit

Explanatory variable

ΔD

Adj. RP2P

ΔIRN

Δ S

Δ SE

Pairwise model

й O

<υ əa

й S
о Й
C‰ cs
Q>

Δ of_tbi                  .00

.03

.22

Δ ofreit                .92

.00

.32

Multiple variable model

Δ of_tbi                   .14

.00

.02

.22

.58

.03

.28

Δ ofreit                .70

.40

.70

.50

.07

.12

36

The table shows the p-values in the tests. The null hypothesis is that of no Granger causality between the
variables. The models include one lag and one dummy variable that takes the value one in a single period
(2008Q4) and is zero otherwise.

Table 6 Granger causality test results for retail property

Explanatory variable

Adj

RP2P

Δ tbi

Δ reit

INF

ΔIR

Δ S

Δ SE

ΔD

Δ GDP

O

ð S
ω 'C
C‰ aS

Q

Pairwise model

Δ retbi

Δ re reit

.15

.96

.07

.00

.41

.34

Multiple variable model

Δ retbi

.28

.04

.08

.64

.21

.04

.31

.01

.47

Δ re reit

.39

.50

.14

.58

.19

.51

.01

.09

.46

The table shows the p-values in the tests. The null hypothesis is that of no Granger causality between the
variables. The models include one lag and two dummy variables that take the value one in a single period
(1995Q2, 2008Q4) and are zero otherwise. Due to heteroscedasticity of the residuals in the model for Δrereit,
the p-values for Δ rereit in the multiple variable model are based on a covariance matrix that is computed
allowing for heteroscedasticity as in White (1980).

28



More intriguing information

1. The problem of anglophone squint
2. The name is absent
3. Should informal sector be subsidised?
4. Behavior-Based Early Language Development on a Humanoid Robot
5. Chebyshev polynomial approximation to approximate partial differential equations
6. The name is absent
7. Short- and long-term experience in pulmonary vein segmental ostial ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation*
8. The Role of State Trading Enterprises and Their Impact on Agricultural Development and Economic Growth in Developing Countries
9. Education and Development: The Issues and the Evidence
10. Return Predictability and Stock Market Crashes in a Simple Rational Expectations Model