References
[1] Arrow, K.J. (1962) “Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention”
in The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors by
R.R. Nelson Ed., Princeton University Press: Princeton, 609—625.
[2] de Meza, D. (1986) “Immiserising invention The private and social returns to R&D
under oligopoly” International Journal of Industrial Organization 4, 409—417.
[3] Kamien, M.I. (1992) “Patent licensing” in Handbook of Game Theory with Economic
Applications by R.J. Aumann, and S. Hart, Eds., Elsevier Science Publishers: Am-
sterdam, Vol. 1, Ch. 11, 331—354
[4] Kamien, M.I and Y. Tauman (1986) “Fees versus royalties and the private value of
patent” Quarterly Journal of Economics 101, 471—491.
[5] Ino, H. (2010) “Fee Versus Royalties in General Cost functions” mimeo.
[6] Liao, C and D. Sen (2005) “Subsidy in Licensing: Optimality and Welfare Implica-
tions.” The Manchester School 73, 281—99.
[7] Sen, D and Y. Tauman (2007) “General licensing schemes for a cost-reducing inno-
vation” Games and Economic Behavior 59, 163—186.
[8] Wang, X.H. (1998) “Fee Versus Royalty Licensing in a Cournot Duopoly Model”
Economics Letters 60, 55—62.
10
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. PROFITABILITY OF ALFALFA HAY STORAGE USING PROBABILITIES: AN EXTENSION APPROACH
3. Firm Creation, Firm Evolution and Clusters in Chile’s Dynamic Wine Sector: Evidence from the Colchagua and Casablanca Regions
4. The Economics of Uncovered Interest Parity Condition for Emerging Markets: A Survey
5. Auctions in an outcome-based payment scheme to reward ecological services in agriculture – Conception, implementation and results
6. Workforce or Workfare?
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ALTERNATIVE ECONOMETRIC PACKAGES: AN APPLICATION TO ITALIAN DEPOSIT INTEREST RATES
10. The name is absent