References
[1] Arrow, K.J. (1962) “Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention”
in The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors by
R.R. Nelson Ed., Princeton University Press: Princeton, 609—625.
[2] de Meza, D. (1986) “Immiserising invention The private and social returns to R&D
under oligopoly” International Journal of Industrial Organization 4, 409—417.
[3] Kamien, M.I. (1992) “Patent licensing” in Handbook of Game Theory with Economic
Applications by R.J. Aumann, and S. Hart, Eds., Elsevier Science Publishers: Am-
sterdam, Vol. 1, Ch. 11, 331—354
[4] Kamien, M.I and Y. Tauman (1986) “Fees versus royalties and the private value of
patent” Quarterly Journal of Economics 101, 471—491.
[5] Ino, H. (2010) “Fee Versus Royalties in General Cost functions” mimeo.
[6] Liao, C and D. Sen (2005) “Subsidy in Licensing: Optimality and Welfare Implica-
tions.” The Manchester School 73, 281—99.
[7] Sen, D and Y. Tauman (2007) “General licensing schemes for a cost-reducing inno-
vation” Games and Economic Behavior 59, 163—186.
[8] Wang, X.H. (1998) “Fee Versus Royalty Licensing in a Cournot Duopoly Model”
Economics Letters 60, 55—62.
10
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. A Unified Model For Developmental Robotics
3. EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES
4. Does adult education at upper secondary level influence annual wage earnings?
5. Evolution of cognitive function via redeployment of brain areas
6. Outsourcing, Complementary Innovations and Growth
7. Word Sense Disambiguation by Web Mining for Word Co-occurrence Probabilities
8. An Economic Analysis of Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Consumption: Implications for Overweight and Obesity among Higher- and Lower-Income Consumers
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent