PER UNIT COSTS TO OWN AND OPERATE FARM MACHINERY



true custom rate, then machinery costs are a strength for the farm. If the farm is performing
machinery operations for more than the true custom rates, then machinery costs would be a
weakness and the farm might consider “out sourcing,” or having someone else perform the
machinery operations by hiring custom work to be done.

Models

The underlying conceptual model of this research is based on the premise that crop
machinery costs are dependent upon the field operations performed and the size of the farm, with
farm size being represented by harvested acres, and is characterized as

(1) tcmc = f(field operations, harvested acres).

The dependent variable is the total crop machinery cost (tcmc) for a farm, and the independent
variables are the number of units (acres, tons, bales, etc.) each of the individual farming
operations were performed on as well as the total harvested acres for the given farm. The
conceptual model above was empirically specified with four different functional forms to capture
the scale or size effect of farms. The functional forms include linear, quadratic, reciprocal, and
logarithmic. The empirical specification of the linear model (model 1) is the following
(2)    
tcmci=[β1fcwofi+β2swofi+β3dski+β4schi+β5dchi+β6ddchi+β7mbpi+β8rcci+

β9dntwofi+β10drtwofi+β11pntwofi+β12prtwofi+β13spci+β14spfi+β15spcfi+β16nh3i+β17bdfi+
β18ilfi+β19hwi+β20whtydi+β21hci+β22cornydi+β23hgsi+β24gsydi+β25hsbi+β26sbydi+
β27hsfi+β28swthi+β29rhi+β30slrbi+β31llrbi+β32lsbi+β33ssbi+β34csi+β35rmi+β36fpmi+
β37gsmi +(β38β1fcwfi) +(β38β2swfi) +(β8β9dntwfi) +(β38β10drtwfi) +(β38β11pntwfi) +
(β38β12prtwfi)]{β39+β40hai}+ei,

where variables in the model are defined in Table 1 and the subscript i denotes individual farms.

The estimated coefficients β1 to β37 represent the per unit charge to perform the
respective field operations. The sign on all of the coefficients is expected to be positive, as to
say it actually does cost money to perform field operations. The estimated coefficients
β20 ,



More intriguing information

1. Trade Openness and Volatility
2. The name is absent
3. Contribution of Economics to Design of Sustainable Cattle Breeding Programs in Eastern Africa: A Choice Experiment Approach
4. Gender and headship in the twenty-first century
5. Fighting windmills? EU industrial interests and global climate negotiations
6. Industrial districts, innovation and I-district effect: territory or industrial specialization?
7. ARE VOLATILITY EXPECTATIONS CHARACTERIZED BY REGIME SHIFTS? EVIDENCE FROM IMPLIED VOLATILITY INDICES
8. The name is absent
9. Should Local Public Employment Services be Merged with the Local Social Benefit Administrations?
10. The name is absent
11. BARRIERS TO EFFICIENCY AND THE PRIVATIZATION OF TOWNSHIP-VILLAGE ENTERPRISES
12. 5th and 8th grade pupils’ and teachers’ perceptions of the relationships between teaching methods, classroom ethos, and positive affective attitudes towards learning mathematics in Japan
13. Telecommuting and environmental policy - lessons from the Ecommute program
14. HEDONIC PRICES IN THE MALTING BARLEY MARKET
15. The name is absent
16. Voluntary Teaming and Effort
17. The name is absent
18. Are class size differences related to pupils’ educational progress and classroom processes? Findings from the Institute of Education Class Size Study of children aged 5-7 Years
19. The name is absent
20. The name is absent