Staying on the Dole



retraining, insert (7) and (9) and e = 0 into hA < hC to get:

λ I s         δτλ0(1 - d)

(10)


τ + 1 - θ < δτ (1 - b) + δτ d

Thus, STU is more likely to be observed when the opportunity costs of being unemployed are
low (i.e. when labor markets are currently tight (large
λ0) but little tightness is expected in the
future (small
λτ)), when the direct cost in terms of human capital degradation are low (low d),
when the benefits of STU are high (i.e. unemployment benefits (
b) are generous and granted for
a long period (i.e.
δτ is large)), and when exiting unemployment after some time is relatively
attractive (i.e. welfare assistance (
s) is low, and taxes on labor income (θ) are not too high).
Ceteris paribus, STU without re-education is more prevalent among older workers (low
δT).

3. Comparative Statics

We now discuss how labor market institutions (in particular, the generosity of unemployment
benefits
b, duration of eligibility for unemployment benefits τ , labor market taxes θ, generosity of
welfare assistance
s), the characteristics of the unemployed (in particular, human capital h, skill
loss
d, age T -τ, retraining costs c) interact with adverse contemporaneous (λ0) or expected (λτ)
labor market shocks to explain retraining and the duration of unemployment. By differentiating
the functions (7) and (9) with respect to the model’s institutional and individual parameters
we obtain how
hA and hC change their position in the career diagram, providing comparative
statics of individual career decisions. If we imagine a country’s (or region’s) workforce ordered
along the
h-line according to their human capital endowment, we can infer the comparative
statics of aggregate short-term and long-term unemployment.

3.1. Unemployment Benefits. In line with empirical evidence, we find that a higher replace-
ment rate
b increases overall unemployment (e.g. Nickell et al., 2005). Our model predicts an
increase STU, but not in LTU. In Figure 1, an increase in
b leaves hA unaffected and shifts hC
to the right.

∂hA        ∂hc _     δτ hC

∂b , ∂b    δτ (1 — b) + δτ d > .

Higher unemployment benefits increase STU because they make it worthwhile to let human
capital erode for a while or to use an unemployment spell for the accumulation of new skills.
Unemployment benefits increase STU at the expense of employment and leave LTU unaffected.



More intriguing information

1. Errors in recorded security prices and the turn-of-the year effect
2. The name is absent
3. Natural Resources: Curse or Blessing?
4. Distribution of aggregate income in Portugal from 1995 to 2000 within a SAM (Social Accounting Matrix) framework. Modeling the household sector
5. Insecure Property Rights and Growth: The Roles of Appropriation Costs, Wealth Effects, and Heterogeneity
6. The name is absent
7. The changing face of Chicago: demographic trends in the 1990s
8. KNOWLEDGE EVOLUTION
9. The name is absent
10. Keynesian Dynamics and the Wage-Price Spiral:Estimating a Baseline Disequilibrium Approach
11. The name is absent
12. Financial Development and Sectoral Output Growth in 19th Century Germany
13. EU Preferential Partners in Search of New Policy Strategies for Agriculture: The Case of Citrus Sector in Trinidad and Tobago
14. Neural Network Modelling of Constrained Spatial Interaction Flows
15. Stakeholder Activism, Managerial Entrenchment, and the Congruence of Interests between Shareholders and Stakeholders
16. Fiscal Policy Rules in Practice
17. Pass-through of external shocks along the pricing chain: A panel estimation approach for the euro area
18. A Multimodal Framework for Computer Mediated Learning: The Reshaping of Curriculum Knowledge and Learning
19. The name is absent
20. The Role of State Trading Enterprises and Their Impact on Agricultural Development and Economic Growth in Developing Countries