Geography, Health, and Demo-Economic Development



savings and fertility is largest close to subsistence level and vanishes as income goes to infinity
and C becomes negligible small relative to income.

Adults supply one unit of labor and receive labor income y . In old age they expect to consume
capital income, c
2 = (1 + r)sy, where r denotes the expected interest rate and s is the savings
rate. Thus, their budget constraint is

y = c1 + sy + nhy = c1 + c2/(1 + r) + nhy .                     (4)

Maximization of (3) subject to (1) and (4) provides the following first oder conditions for an
interior solution.

∂u
∂c
1

∂u

= (1 + r)-

∂c2

βι     r 1 ɪ ʌ β2

----= = (1 + r)- ,

C1 C            C2

(5a)

∂u

∂n π

∂u

= ;■ hy
∂c
1

β3     β1 h

— =----=hy ,

n C1 C

(5b)

∂u

n

∂n

∂π ∂u ∂u

∂h + ∂h = ∂C1ny

β3           β4     β1

- (1 - π)λ + ɪ = ny .

(5c)

Condition (5a) equates marginal utility from current and future consumption. Condition (5b)
requires that utility from having another child equates child costs in terms of foregone utility from
consumption. According to condition (5c) utility from spending an additional unit of income
on children - derived directly through higher quality children (or the warm glow of giving) and
indirectly through the impact of health expenditure on family size - equates marginal child costs
in terms of foregone utility from consumption. Holding consumption constant we see from (5b)
that higher child expenditure (h
y) is observed together with the desire for a smaller family
(lower n and higher
∂u∕∂n). This is the Beckerian child quantity-quality trade-off.

The presence of mortality and health expenditure generates a second quantity-quality trade-
off visible in (5c). To understand its consequence consider an increase of fundamental survival
probability π. This has a twofold negative effect on the first term on the left hand side: First,
marginal utility from health expenditure driven by the wish for a large family
(∂u∕∂n n = β3∕π)
decreases, because more children survive anyway. Second, marginal returns of health expenditure
(∂π∕∂h = [1 π]λ) are lower because child expenditure is less effective in preventing death under
the generally improved survival conditions. As a consequence parents reduce their fertility rate
and the right hand side of (5c) decreases.



More intriguing information

1. BODY LANGUAGE IS OF PARTICULAR IMPORTANCE IN LARGE GROUPS
2. The fundamental determinants of financial integration in the European Union
3. The constitution and evolution of the stars
4. Subduing High Inflation in Romania. How to Better Monetary and Exchange Rate Mechanisms?
5. The name is absent
6. Reversal of Fortune: Macroeconomic Policy, International Finance, and Banking in Japan
7. The Role of Land Retirement Programs for Management of Water Resources
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. HOW WILL PRODUCTION, MARKETING, AND CONSUMPTION BE COORDINATED? FROM A FARM ORGANIZATION VIEWPOINT
11. The use of formal education in Denmark 1980-1992
12. The name is absent
13. PACKAGING: A KEY ELEMENT IN ADDED VALUE
14. Weak and strong sustainability indicators, and regional environmental resources
15. The name is absent
16. Cultural Diversity and Human Rights: a propos of a minority educational reform
17. Word searches: on the use of verbal and non-verbal resources during classroom talk
18. The name is absent
19. Manufacturing Earnings and Cycles: New Evidence
20. Rural-Urban Economic Disparities among China’s Elderly