after a positive supply shock, whereas there is a non-significant response or a decline
following cyclical shocks, would suggest a larger role for productive public spending in
France instead. Evidence for Germany rather seems to indicate a too large size of
government. We find that revenues and spending go up permanently after cyclical shocks,
but positive supply shocks tend to be associated with reductions in spending.
Figure 5.3 Impulse Responses (response to a 1 standard deviation shock,
bootstrapped responses with 5000 draws)
France
response of Y to shock in Cyclical
0.60
0.40
0.20
-0.00
-0.20
-0.40
-0.60
-0.80
123456789 10
3.50
3.00 -
2.50 -
2.00 -
1.50 -
1.00 -
0.50 -
0.00
-0.50 -
-1.00 -
response of Y to shock in Supply
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
response of T to shock in Cyclical
1.25
1.00 -
0.75 -
0.50 -
0.25 -
0.00
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
137
More intriguing information
1. The Shepherd Sinfonia2. The name is absent
3. Evaluating the Success of the School Commodity Food Program
4. The name is absent
5. Influence of Mucilage Viscosity On The Globule Structure And Stability Of Certain Starch Emulsions
6. The name is absent
7. Dynamiques des Entreprises Agroalimentaires (EAA) du Languedoc-Roussillon : évolutions 1998-2003. Programme de recherche PSDR 2001-2006 financé par l'Inra et la Région Languedoc-Roussillon
8. A Review of Kuhnian and Lakatosian “Explanations” in Economics
9. Computational Experiments with the Fuzzy Love and Romance
10. Applications of Evolutionary Economic Geography