The Netherlands is the only country to include both zero and 3 per cent within the real
time 95 per cent confidence interval in the last 5 years of our sample. It is hence the only
country where we are statistically unable to see whether or not it is likely to meet one or
both of its treaty and Council commitments. However, even given the uncertainty about
the current cyclical position, which is greater here than in most other countries (except
perhaps France) we can be reasonably sure that the surplus we currently see has some
structural component and is unlikely, at the 95 per cent confidence level, to involve an
underlying deficit position in breach of the 3 per cent floor. However, in 2003 for a
period the budget deficit was sufficiently large that it is unlikely that it could be explained
by cyclical factors, in that the bounds did not include zero.
The uncertainty surrounding the output gap estimate in Belgium is noticeably lower than
in the Netherlands, and we can be relatively sure, at the 95 per cent level, that the current
position represents a structurally adjusted budget deficit of somewhere between -1.5 and
+1.5 per cent of GDP.
Figure 7.7 Belgium - Budget Deficit Cyclical Adjustment - Real Time

BGGBR outturn -----BGGBR-Cyclically adjusted —I- BGGBR-adjusted upper bound
BGGBR-adjusted lower bound......BGGBR-adjusted full sample
197
More intriguing information
1. Handling the measurement error problem by means of panel data: Moment methods applied on firm data2. Staying on the Dole
3. The name is absent
4. Modelling the Effects of Public Support to Small Firms in the UK - Paradise Gained?
5. The name is absent
6. The duration of fixed exchange rate regimes
7. Place of Work and Place of Residence: Informal Hiring Networks and Labor Market Outcomes
8. The value-added of primary schools: what is it really measuring?
9. The name is absent
10. ¿Por qué se privatizan servicios en los municipios (pequeños)? Evidencia empírica sobre residuos sólidos y agua.