Table 3 |
: 101 proposals to reform the |
SGP. Frequency distribution across clusters and characteristics | ||||||||||
_____________________________Cluster_________________________________ |
Total_______ |
F-test | ||||||||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 | |||||||||
Disenchanted |
Defenders of |
Advocates of |
Supporters of | |||||||||
No |
% |
No |
% |
No |
__% |
No |
% |
No |
% | |||
31 |
30.7 |
19 |
18.8 |
32 |
31.7 |
19 |
18.8 |
101 |
100 | |||
Variable |
Category____________________________ | |||||||||||
aim |
1=Short-term stabilisation |
3 |
9.7 |
6 |
31.6 |
5 |
15.6 |
5 |
26.3 |
19 |
18.8 | |
2=Short-term budget discipline |
5 |
16.1 |
4 |
21.1 |
1 |
3.1 |
1 |
5.3 |
11 |
10.9 | ||
3=Long-run sustainability |
5 |
16.1 |
2 |
10.5 |
5 |
15.6 |
7 |
36.8 |
19 |
18.8 | ||
4=Optimal policy mix |
4 |
12.9 |
2 |
10.5 |
7 |
21.9 |
0 |
0.0 |
13 |
12.9 | ||
5=Economic growth |
4 |
12.9 |
1 |
5.3 |
5 |
15.6 |
2 |
10.5 |
12 |
11.9 | ||
6=Combination of aims |
5 |
16.1 |
4 |
21.1 |
7 |
21.9 |
3 |
15.8 |
19 |
18.8 | ||
7=Market solution |
5 |
16.1 |
0 |
0.0 |
2 |
6.3 |
1 |
5.3 |
8 |
7.9 | ||
Total_____________________________________ |
31 |
100 |
19 |
100 |
32 |
100 |
19 |
100 |
101 |
100 |
0.11 | |
model |
No |
25 |
80.6 |
9 |
47.4 |
29 |
90.6 |
11 |
57.9 |
74 |
73.3 | |
Yes |
6 |
19.4 |
10 |
52.6 |
3 |
9.4 |
8 |
42.1 |
27 |
26.7 | ||
Total________________________________________ |
31 |
100 |
19 |
100 |
32 |
100 |
19 |
100 |
101 |
100.0 |
0.00 | |
empir |
No |
25 |
80.6 |
6 |
31.6 |
10 |
31.3 |
15 |
78.9 |
56 |
55.4 | |
Yes |
6 |
19.4 |
13 |
68.4 |
22 |
68.8 |
4 |
21.1 |
45 |
44.6 | ||
Total_____________________________________ |
31 |
100 |
19 |
100 |
32 |
100 |
19 |
100 |
101 |
100 |
0.00 | |
0=No modification or stregthening of | ||||||||||||
modif |
SGP |
1 |
3.2 |
1 |
5.3 |
2 |
6.3 |
1 |
5.3 |
5 |
5.0 | |
1=Reinterpretation of old SGP |
3 |
9.7 |
0 |
0.0 |
1 |
3.1 |
0 |
0.0 |
4 |
4.0 | ||
2=Changes in rules and procedures |
15 |
48.4 |
9 |
47.4 |
19 |
59.4 |
10 |
52.6 |
53 |
52.5 | ||
3=Changes in institutions 4=Changes in both rules and procedures |
3 |
9.7 |
4 |
21.1 |
3 |
9.4 |
1 |
5.3 |
11 |
10.9 | ||
and institutions |
3 |
9.7 |
3 |
15.8 |
2 |
6.3 |
3 |
15.8 |
11 |
10.9 | ||
5=Abolish the SGP, alternatives |
6 |
19.4 |
2 |
10.5 |
5 |
15.6 |
4 |
21.1 |
17 |
16.8 | ||
Total________________________________________ |
31 |
100.0 |
19 |
100.0 |
32 |
100.0 |
19 |
100.0 |
101 |
100.0 |
0.83 | |
nprop |
1 |
28 |
90.3 |
16 |
84.2 |
23 |
71.9 |
10 |
52.6 |
77 |
76.2 | |
2 |
0 |
0.0 |
1 |
5.3 |
6 |
18.8 |
8 |
42.1 |
15 |
14.9 | ||
3 |
3 |
9.7 |
2 |
10.5 |
2 |
6.3 |
0 |
0.0 |
7 |
6.9 | ||
More than 3 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0.0 |
1 |
3.1 |
1 |
5.3 |
2 |
2.0 | ||
Total_____________________________________ |
31 |
100 |
19 |
100 |
32 |
100 |
19 |
100 |
101 |
100 |
0.16 | |
welf |
Political economy |
10 |
32.3 |
8 |
42.1 |
9 |
28.1 |
5 |
26.3 |
32 |
31.7 | |
Welfare |
15 |
48.4 |
7 |
36.8 |
20 |
62.5 |
10 |
52.6 |
52 |
51.5 | ||
Both |
6 |
19.4 |
4 |
21.1 |
3 |
9.4 |
4 |
21.1 |
17 |
16.8 | ||
Total________________________________________ |
31 |
100.0 |
19 |
100.0 |
32 |
100.0 |
19 |
100.0 |
101 |
100.0 |
0.48 | |
date |
More than 6 years |
2 |
6.5 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0.0 |
2 |
2.0 | |
Less than 6 and more than 2 years |
3 |
9.7 |
3 |
15.8 |
2 |
6.3 |
1 |
5.3 |
9 |
8.9 | ||
Less than 2 years and more than 1 year |
2 |
6.5 |
4 |
21.1 |
3 |
9.4 |
1 |
5.3 |
10 |
9.9 | ||
One year before Nov. 2003 |
8 |
25.8 |
7 |
36.8 |
11 |
34.4 |
6 |
31.6 |
32 |
31.7 | ||
After Nov. 2003 |
16 |
51.6 |
5 |
26.3 |
16 |
50.0 |
11 |
57.9 |
48 |
47.5 | ||
Total_____________________________________ |
31 |
100.0 |
19 |
100.0 |
32 |
100.0 |
19 |
100.0 |
101 |
100.0 |
0.32 | |
large |
Small |
6 |
19.4 |
4 |
21.1 |
4 |
12.5 |
6 |
31.6 |
20 |
19.8 | |
Large |
22 |
71.0 |
15 |
78.9 |
28 |
87.5 |
11 |
57.9 |
76 |
75.2 | ||
Both |
3 |
9.7 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0.0 |
2 |
10.5 |
5 |
5.0 | ||
Total_____________________________________ |
31 |
100 |
19 |
100 |
32 |
100 |
19 |
100 |
101 |
100 |
0.22 | |
euro |
Non-euro area |
11 |
35.5 |
6 |
31.6 |
5 |
15.6 |
5 |
26.3 |
27 |
26.7 | |
Euro-area |
16 |
51.6 |
12 |
63.2 |
25 |
78.1 |
11 |
57.9 |
64 |
63.4 | ||
Both |
4 |
12.9 |
1 |
5.3 |
2 |
6.3 |
3 |
15.8 |
10 |
9.9 | ||
Total_____________________________________ |
31 |
100 |
19 |
100 |
32 |
100 |
19 |
100 |
101 |
100 |
0.21 | |
eur |
Non-EU |
4 |
12.9 |
4 |
21.1 |
1 |
3.1 |
2 |
10.5 |
11 |
10.9 | |
EU |
23 |
74.2 |
14 |
73.7 |
29 |
90.6 |
17 |
89.5 |
83 |
82.2 | ||
Both |
4 |
12.9 |
1 |
5.3 |
2 |
6.3 |
0 |
0.0 |
7 |
6.9 | ||
Total_____________________________________ |
31 |
100 |
19 |
100 |
32 |
100 |
19 |
100 |
101 |
100 |
0.21 | |
acad |
No |
10 |
32.3 |
5 |
26.3 |
11 |
34.4 |
1 |
5.3 |
27 |
26.7 | |
Yes |
18 |
58.1 |
13 |
68.4 |
15 |
46.9 |
15 |
78.9 |
61 |
60.4 | ||
Both |
3 |
9.7 |
1 |
5.3 |
6 |
18.8 |
3 |
15.8 |
13 |
12.9 | ||
Total_____________________________________ |
31 |
100.0 |
19 |
100.0 |
32 |
100.0 |
19 |
100.0 |
101 |
100.0 |
0.10 | |
Note: F-test displays the probability value of the test that the average value of |
a given category is the same |
across clusters. |
-38-
More intriguing information
1. Weak and strong sustainability indicators, and regional environmental resources2. Education Responses to Climate Change and Quality: Two Parts of the Same Agenda?
3. Geography, Health, and Demo-Economic Development
4. The Mathematical Components of Engineering
5. Do imputed education histories provide satisfactory results in fertility analysis in the Western German context?
6. Higher education funding reforms in England: the distributional effects and the shifting balance of costs
7. Inflation Targeting and Nonlinear Policy Rules: The Case of Asymmetric Preferences (new title: The Fed's monetary policy rule and U.S. inflation: The case of asymmetric preferences)
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Expectation Formation and Endogenous Fluctuations in Aggregate Demand