101 Proposals to reform the Stability and Growth Pact. Why so many? A Survey



Table 3

: 101 proposals to reform the

SGP. Frequency distribution across clusters and characteristics

_____________________________Cluster_________________________________

Total_______

F-test

1

2

3

4

Disenchanted
reformers

Defenders of
fiscal discipline

Advocates of
economic
growth

Supporters of
long-term
sustainability

No

%

No

%

No

__%

No

%

No

%

31

30.7

19

18.8

32

31.7

19

18.8

101

100

Variable

Category____________________________

aim

1=Short-term stabilisation

3

9.7

6

31.6

5

15.6

5

26.3

19

18.8

2=Short-term budget discipline

5

16.1

4

21.1

1

3.1

1

5.3

11

10.9

3=Long-run sustainability

5

16.1

2

10.5

5

15.6

7

36.8

19

18.8

4=Optimal policy mix

4

12.9

2

10.5

7

21.9

0

0.0

13

12.9

5=Economic growth

4

12.9

1

5.3

5

15.6

2

10.5

12

11.9

6=Combination of aims

5

16.1

4

21.1

7

21.9

3

15.8

19

18.8

7=Market solution

5

16.1

0

0.0

2

6.3

1

5.3

8

7.9

Total_____________________________________

31

100

19

100

32

100

19

100

101

100

0.11

model

No

25

80.6

9

47.4

29

90.6

11

57.9

74

73.3

Yes

6

19.4

10

52.6

3

9.4

8

42.1

27

26.7

Total________________________________________

31

100

19

100

32

100

19

100

101

100.0

0.00

empir

No

25

80.6

6

31.6

10

31.3

15

78.9

56

55.4

Yes

6

19.4

13

68.4

22

68.8

4

21.1

45

44.6

Total_____________________________________

31

100

19

100

32

100

19

100

101

100

0.00

0=No modification or stregthening of

modif

SGP

1

3.2

1

5.3

2

6.3

1

5.3

5

5.0

1=Reinterpretation of old SGP

3

9.7

0

0.0

1

3.1

0

0.0

4

4.0

2=Changes in rules and procedures

15

48.4

9

47.4

19

59.4

10

52.6

53

52.5

3=Changes in institutions

4=Changes in both rules and procedures

3

9.7

4

21.1

3

9.4

1

5.3

11

10.9

and institutions

3

9.7

3

15.8

2

6.3

3

15.8

11

10.9

5=Abolish the SGP, alternatives

6

19.4

2

10.5

5

15.6

4

21.1

17

16.8

Total________________________________________

31

100.0

19

100.0

32

100.0

19

100.0

101

100.0

0.83

nprop

1

28

90.3

16

84.2

23

71.9

10

52.6

77

76.2

2

0

0.0

1

5.3

6

18.8

8

42.1

15

14.9

3

3

9.7

2

10.5

2

6.3

0

0.0

7

6.9

More than 3

0

0.0

0

0.0

1

3.1

1

5.3

2

2.0

Total_____________________________________

31

100

19

100

32

100

19

100

101

100

0.16

welf

Political economy

10

32.3

8

42.1

9

28.1

5

26.3

32

31.7

Welfare

15

48.4

7

36.8

20

62.5

10

52.6

52

51.5

Both

6

19.4

4

21.1

3

9.4

4

21.1

17

16.8

Total________________________________________

31

100.0

19

100.0

32

100.0

19

100.0

101

100.0

0.48

date

More than 6 years

2

6.5

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

2

2.0

Less than 6 and more than 2 years

3

9.7

3

15.8

2

6.3

1

5.3

9

8.9

Less than 2 years and more than 1 year

2

6.5

4

21.1

3

9.4

1

5.3

10

9.9

One year before Nov. 2003

8

25.8

7

36.8

11

34.4

6

31.6

32

31.7

After Nov. 2003

16

51.6

5

26.3

16

50.0

11

57.9

48

47.5

Total_____________________________________

31

100.0

19

100.0

32

100.0

19

100.0

101

100.0

0.32

large

Small

6

19.4

4

21.1

4

12.5

6

31.6

20

19.8

Large

22

71.0

15

78.9

28

87.5

11

57.9

76

75.2

Both

3

9.7

0

0.0

0

0.0

2

10.5

5

5.0

Total_____________________________________

31

100

19

100

32

100

19

100

101

100

0.22

euro

Non-euro area

11

35.5

6

31.6

5

15.6

5

26.3

27

26.7

Euro-area

16

51.6

12

63.2

25

78.1

11

57.9

64

63.4

Both

4

12.9

1

5.3

2

6.3

3

15.8

10

9.9

Total_____________________________________

31

100

19

100

32

100

19

100

101

100

0.21

eur

Non-EU

4

12.9

4

21.1

1

3.1

2

10.5

11

10.9

EU

23

74.2

14

73.7

29

90.6

17

89.5

83

82.2

Both

4

12.9

1

5.3

2

6.3

0

0.0

7

6.9

Total_____________________________________

31

100

19

100

32

100

19

100

101

100

0.21

acad

No

10

32.3

5

26.3

11

34.4

1

5.3

27

26.7

Yes

18

58.1

13

68.4

15

46.9

15

78.9

61

60.4

Both

3

9.7

1

5.3

6

18.8

3

15.8

13

12.9

Total_____________________________________

31

100.0

19

100.0

32

100.0

19

100.0

101

100.0

0.10

Note: F-test displays the probability value of the test that the average value of

a given category is the same

across clusters.

-38-



More intriguing information

1. Developmental changes in the theta response system: a single sweep analysis
2. A multistate demographic model for firms in the province of Gelderland
3. HOW WILL PRODUCTION, MARKETING, AND CONSUMPTION BE COORDINATED? FROM A FARM ORGANIZATION VIEWPOINT
4. Job quality and labour market performance
5. Land Police in Mozambique: Future Perspectives
6. Licensing Schemes in Endogenous Entry
7. Business Networks and Performance: A Spatial Approach
8. The Composition of Government Spending and the Real Exchange Rate
9. Transport system as an element of sustainable economic growth in the tourist region
10. The name is absent
11. The name is absent
12. An Attempt to 2
13. The name is absent
14. Using Surveys Effectively: What are Impact Surveys?
15. Consumption Behaviour in Zambia: The Link to Poverty Alleviation?
16. Plasmid-Encoded Multidrug Resistance of Salmonella typhi and some Enteric Bacteria in and around Kolkata, India: A Preliminary Study
17. Regulation of the Electricity Industry in Bolivia: Its Impact on Access to the Poor, Prices and Quality
18. Getting the practical teaching element right: A guide for literacy, numeracy and ESOL teacher educators
19. The name is absent
20. fMRI Investigation of Cortical and Subcortical Networks in the Learning of Abstract and Effector-Specific Representations of Motor Sequences