Estimating the Technology of Cognitive and Noncognitive Skill Formation



We identify technology (2.1) using the relationship

fk,s t, Ik,t, θpk,t) = G-1 k,t | θt, Ik,t, θp),

where G-1 k,t | θt,Ik,tp) denotes the inverse of G (θ | θt, Ik,tp) with respect to its first
argument (assuming it exists), i.e., the value
θ such that ηk,t = G (θ | θt, Ik,tp). By con-
struction, this operation produces a function f
k,s that generates outcomes θk,t+1 with the
appropriate distribution, because a continuously distributed random variable is mapped into
a uniformly distributed variable under the mapping defined by its own cdf.

The more traditional separable technology with zero mean disturbance, θk,t+1

= fk,st, Ik,t, θp) + ηk,t, is covered by our analysis if we define

fk,s t,Ik,tp) ≡ E k,t | θt,Ik,tp] ,

where the expectation is taken under the density pθk t+1θt,Ik t,θP, which can be calculated from
pθ . The density of ηk,t conditional on all variables is identified from

pnk,tθt,ik,tp (ηk,t | θt, Ik,t, θP) = pθk,t+ιθt,ik,tp (ηk,t + Ek,t+ι | θt, Ik,t, θP] | θt, Ik,t, θP) ,

since pθk t+1θt,Ik t,θP is known once pθ is known. We now show how to anchor the scales of
θ
C,t+1 and θN,t+1 using measures of adult outcomes.

3.5 Anchoring Skills in an Interpretable Metric

It is common in the empirical literature on child schooling and investment to measure out-
comes by test scores. However, test scores are arbitrarily scaled. To gain a better under-
standing of the relative importance of cognitive and noncognitive skills and their interactions
and the relative importance of investments at different stages of the life cycle, it is desirable
to anchor skills in a common scale. In what follows, we continue to keep the conditioning on
the regressors implicit.

We model the effect of period T + 1 cognitive and noncognitive skills on adult outcomes
Z
4,j , for j {1, . . . , J}.23 Suppose that there are J1 observed outcomes that are linear
functions of cognitive and noncognitive skills at the end of childhood, i.e., in period T :

Z4,j = μ4,j + α4,C,jθC,T +1 + α4,N,jθN,T +1 + ε4,j, for j {1, . . . , J1}.

When adult outcomes are linear and separable functions of skills, we define the anchoring
23The Z4,j correspond to the Qj of Section 2.

16



More intriguing information

1. A production model and maintenance planning model for the process industry
2. MATHEMATICS AS AN EXACT AND PRECISE LANGUAGE OF NATURE
3. What Contribution Can Residential Field Courses Make to the Education of 11-14 Year-olds?
4. CREDIT SCORING, LOAN PRICING, AND FARM BUSINESS PERFORMANCE
5. THE UNCERTAIN FUTURE OF THE MEXICAN MARKET FOR U.S. COTTON: IMPACT OF THE ELIMINATION OF TEXTILE AND CLOTHING QUOTAS
6. The name is absent
7. Developmental changes in the theta response system: a single sweep analysis
8. An Empirical Analysis of the Curvature Factor of the Term Structure of Interest Rates
9. Cancer-related electronic support groups as navigation-aids: Overcoming geographic barriers
10. The name is absent
11. Government spending composition, technical change and wage inequality
12. Labour Market Flexibility and Regional Unemployment Rate Dynamics: Spain (1980-1995)
13. Firm Creation, Firm Evolution and Clusters in Chile’s Dynamic Wine Sector: Evidence from the Colchagua and Casablanca Regions
14. Midwest prospects and the new economy
15. Outline of a new approach to the nature of mind
16. The name is absent
17. Errors in recorded security prices and the turn-of-the year effect
18. The name is absent
19. O funcionalismo de Sellars: uma pesquisa histδrica
20. Stillbirth in a Tertiary Care Referral Hospital in North Bengal - A Review of Causes, Risk Factors and Prevention Strategies