Estimating the Technology of Cognitive and Noncognitive Skill Formation



Skills evolve in the following way. Each agent is born with initial conditions θ1 =
(
θC,1 , θN,1). Family environments and genetic factors may influence these initial conditions
(see Olds, 2002, and Levitt, 2003). We denote by
θP = (θC,P , θN,P ) parental cognitive and
noncognitive skills, respectively.
θt = (θC,t, θN,t) denotes the vector of skill stocks in period
t. Let ηt = (ηC,t, ηN,t) denote shocks and/or unobserved inputs that affect the accumulation
of cognitive and noncognitive skills, respectively. The technology of production of skill
k in
period
t and developmental stage s depends on the stock of skills in period t, investment at
t, Ik,t, parental skills, θP , shocks in period t, ηk,t, and the production function at stage s :

θk,t+1 = fk,s (θt, Ik,t, θP , ηk,t) ,                                      (2.1)

for k {C, N}, t {1, 2, . . . , T }, and s {1, . . . , S}. We assume that fk,s is monotone
increasing in its arguments, twice continuously differentiable, and concave in
Ik,t . In this
model, stocks of current period skills produce next period skills and affect the current pe-
riod productivity of investments. Stocks of cognitive skills can promote the formation of
noncognitive skills and vice versa because
θt is an argument of (2.1).

Direct complementarity between the stock of skill l and the productivity of investment
Ik,t in producing skill k in period t arises if

2fk,s(∙)0, t {1,...,T}, l,k {C,N}.

k,t l,t

Period t stocks of abilities and skills promote the acquisition of skills by making investment
more productive. Students with greater early cognitive and noncognitive abilities are more
efficient in later learning of both cognitive and noncognitive skills. The evidence from the
early intervention literature suggests that the enriched early environments of the Abecedar-
ian, Perry and Chicago Child-Parent Center (CPC) programs promoted greater efficiency in
learning in schools and reduced problem behaviors.9

Adult outcome j , Qj , is produced by a combination of different skills at the beginning of
period
T + 1:

Qj = gj (θC,T +1, θN,T+1) , j {1, . . . , J}.10                        (2.2)

These outcome equations capture the twin concepts that both cognitive and noncognitive

9See, e.g., Cunha, Heckman, Lochner, and Masterov (2006), Heckman, Malofeeva, Pinto, and Savelyev
(2010), Heckman, Moon, Pinto, Savelyev, and Yavitz (2010b), Heckman, Moon, Pinto, Savelyev, and Yavitz
(2010a), and Reynolds and Temple (2009).

10 To focus on the main contribution of this paper, we focus on investment in children. Thus we assume that
θ
T +1 is the adult stock of skills for the rest of life contrary to the evidence reported in Borghans, Duckworth,
Heckman, and ter Weel (2008). The technology could be extended to accommodate adult investment as in
Ben-Porath (1967) or its generalization Heckman, Lochner, and Taber (1998)



More intriguing information

1. Secondary school teachers’ attitudes towards and beliefs about ability grouping
2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. Willingness-to-Pay for Energy Conservation and Free-Ridership on Subsidization – Evidence from Germany
6. The name is absent
7. Meat Slaughter and Processing Plants’ Traceability Levels Evidence From Iowa
8. An Incentive System for Salmonella Control in the Pork Supply Chain
9. The name is absent
10. Performance - Complexity Comparison of Receivers for a LTE MIMO–OFDM System
11. Imputing Dairy Producers' Quota Discount Rate Using the Individual Export Milk Program in Quebec
12. The economic value of food labels: A lab experiment on safer infant milk formula
13. The fundamental determinants of financial integration in the European Union
14. The name is absent
15. The name is absent
16. The name is absent
17. Naïve Bayes vs. Decision Trees vs. Neural Networks in the Classification of Training Web Pages
18. Inhimillinen pääoma ja palkat Suomessa: Paluu perusmalliin
19. Update to a program for saving a model fit as a dataset
20. The name is absent