The Triangular Relationship between the Commission, NRAs and National Courts Revisited



P. LAROUCHE & M. de VISSER

145


reviewing NRA decisions for general compliance with the law. While the
intensity of review should be higher than that exercised by the Commission
under Article 7, it should not lead to a judicial practice where NRA decisions
are annulled simply because the courts would have preferred another
outcome. Thirdly, as regards accountability of Commission instruments and
comments and ERG documents, an economic analysis of the decision-chain
model should be employed to determine which part of the decision-making
chain should be susceptible to more in-depth judicial review. For those other
parts, accountability can be ensured through more marginal review or
through opening the procedure for the adoption of the measures concerned
and making them more transparent.



More intriguing information

1. Testing the Information Matrix Equality with Robust Estimators
2. The name is absent
3. Happiness in Eastern Europe
4. The name is absent
5. Text of a letter
6. The name is absent
7. Who’s afraid of critical race theory in education? a reply to Mike Cole’s ‘The color-line and the class struggle’
8. THE RISE OF RURAL-TO-RURAL LABOR MARKETS IN CHINA
9. Weather Forecasting for Weather Derivatives
10. The name is absent