P. LAROUCHE & M. de VISSER
145
reviewing NRA decisions for general compliance with the law. While the
intensity of review should be higher than that exercised by the Commission
under Article 7, it should not lead to a judicial practice where NRA decisions
are annulled simply because the courts would have preferred another
outcome. Thirdly, as regards accountability of Commission instruments and
comments and ERG documents, an economic analysis of the decision-chain
model should be employed to determine which part of the decision-making
chain should be susceptible to more in-depth judicial review. For those other
parts, accountability can be ensured through more marginal review or
through opening the procedure for the adoption of the measures concerned
and making them more transparent.
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. Firm Closure, Financial Losses and the Consequences for an Entrepreneurial Restart
4. Whatever happened to competition in space agency procurement? The case of NASA
5. Announcement effects of convertible bond loans versus warrant-bond loans: An empirical analysis for the Dutch market
6. Non-farm businesses local economic integration level: the case of six Portuguese small and medium-sized Markettowns• - a sector approach
7. TINKERING WITH VALUATION ESTIMATES: IS THERE A FUTURE FOR WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT MEASURES?
8. How Low Business Tax Rates Attract Multinational Headquarters: Municipality-Level Evidence from Germany
9. An Efficient Secure Multimodal Biometric Fusion Using Palmprint and Face Image
10. Business Networks and Performance: A Spatial Approach