Strategic monetary policy in a monetary union with non-atomistic wage setters



conservative, instead, the labor demand elasticities are49

1∙      _ ɪ__k + βF ^F__I A__ɪ ʌ

3→∞ "9n   пн k() n + ^f$f(1 a)   ∖    nH /  ’

Iim ηu = --1- +
β→∞    пн 1 — a


(1 - -l)

∖   nH√


σ.


(49)


These relations prove equation (42), (44) and (43). In general, the sign of dηββ- not only
depends on the adverse output and competition effect but also on the other CBC as follows:

N   к(пн 1)(k + βf^F)^n [k + βFkF (k@N + βF^f(1 α))σ]

(50)


~ [k(nn — 1)(k + β F θF )+ пн β(βF Θn Θf (1 a) + N )]2

The sign of ddη-β- is


hence


k    k + βFθF

s*9n Un + βFΘf(1


aσ).


The sign of ^ is


instead always positive:


dηN
F


(1 Θf)Θf(1 Θn)Θn [k(nH 1)σ + пнβ^N]
[k(nH 1)(k + βF&F ) + пн β(βF ^n @f (1 a) + N )]


> 0.


(51)


In the case of a MU the sign of

u   k(nн — 1)(1 — a) [1 — (1 — α)σ]

(52)


    [kfa — 1)+ пн (1 α)2β]2

is given by


sign



σF


The first part of Proposition 5 is proved by taking the partial derivative of (38), (39) and
(40) with respect to CBC and using equation (50) and (52) as follows:

dl a 1 r
dβ k η2



a

^1 + β r

< 0

θr ηr β2

ηr


(53)


Notice that the term in brackets in equation (53) is always positive


since


β r
ηr


adverse output effect under a NMP regime is an increasing function of βF anc


< 1. The

is always


smaller than the adverse output in a MU, ɪɪ^. Now what remains to assess is whether
the labor demand elasticity in MU and NMP intersect in the
(β,ηr) plane. As a matter

49Note that


k+^F ®F1

(1-a)βp Θf +kθκ ^ 1

32



More intriguing information

1. Kharaj and land proprietary right in the sixteenth century: An example of law and economics
2. Policy Formulation, Implementation and Feedback in EU Merger Control
3. The constitution and evolution of the stars
4. XML PUBLISHING SOLUTIONS FOR A COMPANY
5. TWENTY-FIVE YEARS OF RESEARCH ON WOMEN FARMERS IN AFRICA: LESSONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS; WITH AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
6. THE CHANGING RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
7. Changing spatial planning systems and the role of the regional government level; Comparing the Netherlands, Flanders and England
8. Developmental changes in the theta response system: a single sweep analysis
9. The name is absent
10. Spatial patterns in intermunicipal Danish commuting