The name is absent



Reuieip of Islamic Economics, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2004

using minimum inputs, other things remaining unchanged. In (i) we
use a production or output (Y) frontier to measure efficiency while in
(ii) an input or cost (C) frontier is employed. The equations for
determining efficiency scores, their numerical values, interpretations,
and policy implications in the two approaches are quite different. As
writers on Islamic economics have mostly looked at the issue from the
cost angle, this discussion follows suit.

Farell (1957) is credited with being the first to indicate that
productive or
economic efficiency has two components. First is the
purely physical or technical component that refers to the ability of a
PU to produce as much output as given input usage allows, or by
using as little input as output constraints permit. Thus,
technical
efficiency
focuses on avoidance of waste; it essentially has an output
augmentation orientation. Second is
allocative efficiency or the price
component: it refers to the ability of a PU to combine inputs and
outputs in optimal proportions commensurate with their current
prices (Lovell and Tatje, 1997).

The measure of technical efficiency is usually defined as the
maximum reduction of all inputs that would allow continual
production of the
same output as before. Such input level is treated
equal to unity and indicates technical efficiency because no further
input reduction is feasible, and a score of less than unity by the same
token indicates technical inefficiency measured by one minus the
actual score of a PU. Figure 1 illustrates the basic concepts. Here the
PU is producing a given output Q using an input combination defined
by point, say A. The same level of output could have been produced
by radically contracting the use of both labour and capital back to
point B, that lies on the isoquant associated with the minimum level
of inputs required to produce
Q on the basis of available technology.
The input oriented technical efficiency is defined as
TE = OB I OA.
However, it is point
D where rhe marginal rate of technical
substitution equals the input price ratio
Pl / Pl that gives the least
cost combination of inputs for producing
Q. Notice that total cost at
C and D is equal. To achieve the same level of cost, i.e. the
expenditure on inputs, would need A to be contracted further to point
C. Hence, the
cost efficiency is to be defined as OC / OA.



More intriguing information

1. Accurate and robust image superresolution by neural processing of local image representations
2. The name is absent
3. Short Term Memory May Be the Depletion of the Readily Releasable Pool of Presynaptic Neurotransmitter Vesicles
4. sycnoιogιcaι spaces
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Work Rich, Time Poor? Time-Use of Women and Men in Ireland
10. The name is absent
11. Evaluating Consumer Usage of Nutritional Labeling: The Influence of Socio-Economic Characteristics
12. The name is absent
13. The name is absent
14. Economie de l’entrepreneur faits et théories (The economics of entrepreneur facts and theories)
15. Behavior-Based Early Language Development on a Humanoid Robot
16. On Dictatorship, Economic Development and Stability
17. The name is absent
18. The name is absent
19. The name is absent
20. CGE modelling of the resources boom in Indonesia and Australia using TERM