The name is absent



Table 6a: Testing the Existence of the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC)

(Number of observations: 28)

Dependent Variable

ENERGY

ENERGY

GHGS

GHGS

INDOOR

INDOOR

LAND

LAND

Explanatory Variable

Coeff.

Coeff.

Coeff.

Coeff.

Coeff.

Coeff.

Coeff.

Coeff.

Constant

0.2827

(0.1782)

0.9792 *
(0.245)

-0.7672 *

(0.2798)

-1.0282 *

(0.2474)

-0.1426 *

(0.0439)

0.1144 *
(0.0575)

1.5019 *
(0.105)

1.6652 *
(0.1515)

PCNSDP

0.0794 *
(0.0352)

0.0725 *
(0.0418)

0.0440 *
(0.0101)

0.0245 *
(0.0117)

-0.0389 *

(0.0062)

-0.0439 *

(0.0068)

PCNSDP^2

-0.0059 *

(0.0019)

-0.0053 *
(0.002)

0.0102 *
(0.0024)

0.0072 *
(0.0033)

0.0010 *
(0.0006)

0.0018 *
(0.0007)

PCNSDP^3

-0.0006 *

(0.0002)

-0.0005 *

(0.0002)

Prishare

-0.0087 *

(0.0033)

-0.0162 *

(0.0022)

-0.0143 *
(0.002)

SECSHARE

-0.0136 *

(0.0055)

TERSHARE

0.0184 *
(0.0041)

0.0183 *
(0.0036)

POPD

0.0002 *
(0.0001)

-0.0001 *
(0.00003)

-0.0003 *

(0.0001)

-0.0005 *

(0.0001)

AGRWRK

0.0066 *
(0.0034)

0.0103 *
(0.003)

0.0030 *
(0.0006)

-0.0038 *
(0.002)

NAGRWRK

0.0072 *
(0.0037)

Adj. R2

0.495

0.524

0.264

0.315

0.955

0.941

0.749

0.774

F-Stat_______________

9.823

8.431

3.427

3.478

192.002

145.550

27.799

24.053

D-W Stat__________

2.104

1.882

1.873

1.690

2.069

2.105

1.679

1.900

IstTurning Point
(in Rs.'000)__________

6.729

6.840

11.333

9.600

N.A.

N.A.

N.A.

N.A.

Note: Figure in the parenthesis shows the White Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Standard Errors
* -implies coefficient is significant at most at 0.10 level.

N.A. - implies not applicable

Table 6b: Testing the Existence of the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC)

(Number of observations: 28)

Dependent Variable

NPS

NPS

WATER

WATER

FOREST

FOREST

AIRPOL

ExpIanatoryVariabIe

Coeff.

Coeff.

Coeff.

Coeff.

Coeff.

Coeff.

Coeff.

Constant

0.9442 *
(0.0991)

0.8553 *
(0.084)

0.2996 *
(0.1683)

1.0884 *
(0.0969)

-0.0640

(0.214)

1.0679 *
(0.2948)

1.5312 *
(0.2477)

PCNSDP

-0.0172 *

(0.0043)

-0.0331 *

(0.0064)

-0.0353 *

(0.0043)

0.0724 *
(0.017)

0.0715 *
(0.0205)

-0.0197

(0.0118)

PCNSDP^2

-0.0009 *

(0.0002)

Prishare

-0.0123 *

(0.0013)

-0.0118 *

(0.0014)

-0.0075 *

(0.0022)

-0.0116 *

(0.0054)

SECSHARE

0.0058 *
(0.003)

TERSHARE

0.0089 *
(0.0029)

0.0132 *
(0.0045)

POPD

-0.0007 *

(0.0002)

URB

-0.0202 *

(0.0076)

-0.0265 *

(0.0113)

AGRWRK

0.0031 *
(0.0014)

0.0031 *
(0.0014)

-0.0130 *

(0.0036)

Adj. R2

0.591

0.597

0.490

0.502

0.425

0.393

0.273

F-Stat

13.979

14.338

9.649

14.583

7.646

6.820

4.378

D-W Stat

1.282

1.283

1.323

1.245

1.557

1.590

2.156

Note: Figure in the parenthesis shows the White Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Standard Errors
* -implies coefficient is significant at most at 0.10 level.



More intriguing information

1. Cross-Country Evidence on the Link between the Level of Infrastructure and Capital Inflows
2. Can genetic algorithms explain experimental anomalies? An application to common property resources
3. Olfactory Neuroblastoma: Diagnostic Difficulty
4. An Efficient Circulant MIMO Equalizer for CDMA Downlink: Algorithm and VLSI Architecture
5. The name is absent
6. Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Epigenetic Robotics
7. Flatliners: Ideology and Rational Learning in the Diffusion of the Flat Tax
8. BARRIERS TO EFFICIENCY AND THE PRIVATIZATION OF TOWNSHIP-VILLAGE ENTERPRISES
9. TOMOGRAPHIC IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION OF FAN-BEAM PROJECTIONS WITH EQUIDISTANT DETECTORS USING PARTIALLY CONNECTED NEURAL NETWORKS
10. Towards Learning Affective Body Gesture