Imputing Dairy Producers' Quota Discount Rate Using the Individual Export Milk Program in Quebec



Current Agriculture, Food & Resource Issues

M. Doyon, C. Brodeur and J-P. Gervais

References

Cox, T., J. Coleman, J-P. Chavas, and Y. Zhu. 1999. An economic analysis of the effect
on the world dairy sector of extending the Uruguay Round Agreement to 2005.
Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 47: 169-185.

Chen, K., and K. Meilke. 1998. The simple analytics of transferable production quotas:
Implications for the marginal cost of Ontario milk production.
Canadian Journal of
Agricultural Economics
46: 37-52.

Greene, W. H. 2003. Econometric Analyses. 5th edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

GREPA. 2002. Enquête sur les coûts de production des fermes laitières du Québec, 2001.
Quebec: Laval University.

Levallois, R., and J-P. Perrier. 2001. Problématique de l’expansion de l’entreprise laitière
dans le contexte de l’an 2001: Quota ou exportation?
Quebec: Agri-gestion Laval,
Laval University.

Meilke, K. D., R. Sarker, and D. Le Roy. 1998. The potential for increased trade in milk
and dairy products between Canada and the United States.
Canadian Journal of
Agricultural. Economics
46(2): 149-71.

Moschini, G., and K. D. Meilke. 1988. Sustainable rates of return for milk quotas in
Ontario.
Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 36: 119-126.

Tomek, W. G., H. H. Peterson. 2001. Risk management in agricultural markets: A review.
The Journal of Futures Markets 21: 953-985.

Turvey, K., A. Weersink, and C. Martin. 2003. The value of dairy quota under a
commercial export milk program.
Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 51:
69-84.

Endnotes

1 We wish to thank Robert Romain, for providing valuable comments at the early stage of
this research, as well as an anonymous reviewer. The standard disclaimer about remaining
errors applies.

2 Note that fixed costs in (1) are normalized to zero. This assumption is convenient for two
reasons. First, given that output share is the relevant decision variable from the producers’
perspective, fixed costs have impacts in the analysis that cannot be distinguished from
initial wealth impacts in the current stochastic environment. It would be difficult to
pinpoint with confidence the fixed costs level that would fairly represent a large
proportion of Quebec dairy producers. Second, the per-unit nature of the profit function
would also require running simulations that are a function of the scale of production of
various dairy farms.

3 Note that total output of a dairy producer is determined by the size of the dairy cow herd;
thus monthly hectolitres of milk produced are constant. The analysis is thus confined to a
short-run perspective.

129



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. The name is absent
3. Les freins culturels à l'adoption des IFRS en Europe : une analyse du cas français
4. Dual Inflation Under the Currency Board: The Challenges of Bulgarian EU Accession
5. Micro-strategies of Contextualization Cross-national Transfer of Socially Responsible Investment
6. SOCIOECONOMIC TRENDS CHANGING RURAL AMERICA
7. AGRIBUSINESS EXECUTIVE EDUCATION AND KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE: NEW MECHANISMS OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT INVOLVING THE UNIVERSITY, PRIVATE FIRM STAKEHOLDERS AND PUBLIC SECTOR
8. Valuing Farm Financial Information
9. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
10. The name is absent
11. Outline of a new approach to the nature of mind
12. POWER LAW SIGNATURE IN INDONESIAN LEGISLATIVE ELECTION 1999-2004
13. The name is absent
14. Elicited bid functions in (a)symmetric first-price auctions
15. The name is absent
16. Evaluating the Success of the School Commodity Food Program
17. Økonomisk teorihistorie - Overflødig information eller brugbar ballast?
18. The name is absent
19. The name is absent
20. Benefits of travel time savings for freight transportation : beyond the costs