Indirect Effects of Pesticide Regulation and the Food Quality Protection Act



Current Agriculture, Food & Resource Issues

S.B. Cash et al.


The authors are among those who, everything being equal, would prefer to consume
fewer pesticide residues in their own diets. Yet too narrow of a regulatory focus that
ignores economic responses and countervailing health risks is misguided, as the net effect
on public health could be negative. This point is especially pertinent when one considers
that certain pesticide uses have been canceled by the EPA on the basis of consumer risks
that were less than one in a million over a lifetime of exposure. In many cases, other less
costly interventions such as labeling requirements and food preparation education
campaigns may prove to be more effective means of achieving consumer safety with
regard to agricultural chemical use.

References

Ames, B.N., L.S. Gold and W.C. Willett. 1995. The causes and prevention of cancer.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 92:
5258-5265.

Byrd, D.M. 1997. Goodbye pesticides? The food quality protection act of 1996.
Regulation 20: 57-62.

Cash, S.B. 2003. Essays on the economics of protecting health and the environment.

Ph.D. thesis. Berkeley: University of California.

Casida, J. and G. Quistad. 1998. Golden age of insecticide research: past, present, or
future?
Annual Review of Entomology 43: 1-16.

Metcalfe, M., B. McWilliams, B. Hueth, R. van Steenwyk, D. Sunding, A. Swoboda and
D. Zilberman. 2002. The economic importance of organophosphates in California
agriculture. Report prepared for the California Department of Food and Agriculture
by the Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California,
Berkeley.

National Research Council. 1993. Pesticides in the diets of infants and children.

Washington, DC: Report of the Committee on Pesticides in the Diets of Infants and
Children.

United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs. 2002.
Revised OP cumulative risk assesssment. USEPA Web site,
http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative/rra-op/.

United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs. 1999.

Summary of FQPA amendments to FIFRA and FFDCA. USEPA Web site,
http://www.epa.gov/opppsps1/fqpa/fqpa-iss.htm (accessed November 4, 2001).

United States House of Representatives. 1996. The Food Quality Protection Act. H.R Res.
1627, 104th Congress, section 405 (enacted).

Van Houtven, G. and M.L. Cropper. 1996. When is a life too costly to save? The evidence
from U.S. environmental regulations.
Journal of Environmental Economics and
Management
30: 348-368.

79



More intriguing information

1. Markets for Influence
2. Economic Evaluation of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), CHERE Working Paper 2007/6
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. Performance - Complexity Comparison of Receivers for a LTE MIMO–OFDM System
6. THE AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS LABORATORY
7. Has Competition in the Japanese Banking Sector Improved?
8. Sex differences in the structure and stability of children’s playground social networks and their overlap with friendship relations
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent
11. The name is absent
12. Imperfect competition and congestion in the City
13. The name is absent
14. ARE VOLATILITY EXPECTATIONS CHARACTERIZED BY REGIME SHIFTS? EVIDENCE FROM IMPLIED VOLATILITY INDICES
15. The name is absent
16. The purpose of this paper is to report on the 2008 inaugural Equal Opportunities Conference held at the University of East Anglia, Norwich
17. Accurate, fast and stable denoising source separation algorithms
18. ‘I’m so much more myself now, coming back to work’ - working class mothers, paid work and childcare.
19. Types of Tax Concessions for Promoting Investment in Free Economic and Trade Areas
20. Secondary stress in Brazilian Portuguese: the interplay between production and perception studies