Studying How E-Markets Evaluation Can Enhance Trust in Virtual Business Communities



430 Studying How E-Markets Evaluation Can Enhance Trust in Virtual Business Communities

applied evaluation instrument. The e-market recommendation problem is therefore a multi-
criteria decision making one.

According to the multi-criteria decision making literature (Roy, 1996; Jacquet-Lagreze &
Siskos, 2001), each criterion is a non-decreasing real valued function defined on
CxS as
follows:

gi : C × S → K / s gi (s ) K

(2)


where gi (s) is the evaluation of the e-market s on the ith criterion ( i =1,..., n ). Thus, the multi-

criteria evaluation of an e-market s S is given as a vector g(s)   or

g ( s ) =[g 1( s ), g 2( s ),..., gn (s )]


We have previously assumed that the evaluation instrument to

be used for evaluating all e-markets in the context of the VC will be the same. In this version of
the algorithm, we choose the WebQual instrument (Barnes & Vidgen, 2002) and therefore the
criteria set is: Usability (
g1), Information Quality (g2), and Service Interaction Quality (g3).

The developers of WebQual claim that these criteria are independent and sufficient for
measuring the satisfactions of users from e-commerce resources. The above criteria take
values from a 7-point scale {1,.,7}, where ‘1’ is the lower value of the criterion, and ‘7’ the
higher one. Since each criterion
gi is a non-decreasing real valued function, and that there is
no uncertainty during the decision making, the total utility of an e-market
s S for a business
partner
c C can be expressed as:

uc(s)=i3=1wicgic(s)


(3)


where gci(s) is the evaluation value of e-market s on criterion gi, and wci is a weight indicating
the importance of criterion
gi for the particular business partner c, with:

3 wc = 1

(4)


i=1 i

The linear function of Eq.(3) is the simplest and most popular form of an additive value
function, according to the principles of Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT). Others could
include an ideal point model, dependencies and correlations, as well as diminishing utility
forms (Price & Messinger, 2005).

Assuming that there has been a subset of business partners M in the overall community C (that
is
M C ) that has evaluated a subset of e-markets K from the whole population of available
e-markets S (that is
K S), then the following hold:

• For each business partner m M that has evaluated an e-market k K , this evaluation is
m  mmm

defined as the vector g g 1 ʊ,g2   ', g3 ' 2, and there is also a set of importance



More intriguing information

1. Recognizability of Individual Creative Style Within and Across Domains: Preliminary Studies
2. Une Classe de Concepts
3. Motivations, Values and Emotions: Three Sides of the same Coin
4. Mergers under endogenous minimum quality standard: a note
5. Draft of paper published in:
6. A Theoretical Growth Model for Ireland
7. The name is absent
8. A methodological approach in order to support decision-makers when defining Mobility and Transportation Politics
9. Urban Green Space Policies: Performance and Success Conditions in European Cities
10. Demographic Features, Beliefs And Socio-Psychological Impact Of Acne Vulgaris Among Its Sufferers In Two Towns In Nigeria
11. Business Networks and Performance: A Spatial Approach
12. Using Surveys Effectively: What are Impact Surveys?
13. What should educational research do, and how should it do it? A response to “Will a clinical approach make educational research more relevant to practice” by Jacquelien Bulterman-Bos
14. Hemmnisse für die Vernetzungen von Wissenschaft und Wirtschaft abbauen
15. Apprenticeships in the UK: from the industrial-relation via market-led and social inclusion models
16. Valuing Access to our Public Lands: A Unique Public Good Pricing Experiment
17. Wounds and reinscriptions: schools, sexualities and performative subjects
18. Modeling industrial location decisions in U.S. counties
19. The name is absent
20. The name is absent