Studying How E-Markets Evaluation Can Enhance Trust in Virtual Business Communities



Nikos Manouselis et al. 431

wm = [wm wm wm ]

weights — 1 , 2 , 3 J that are associated with the three criteria. It is assumed that the
wm

weights i (i =1,..., 3) that a business partner m gives to each criterion remain the same
(that is, the partner considers the same criteria important when evaluating different e-mar-
kets). The evaluations
gmi(k) are referred to as the evaluations of the business partner m, and
wm

the weights i as the properties of partner m.

• The total utility function of the e-market k for the business partner m is therefore:
um(k)=i3=1wimgim(k), mM(5)

The goal of the e-market recommendation algorithm is to provide to a particular business
partner
a C that has not rated a particular e-market k S (who we will refer to as the active
user
), a ranking of the e-markets. In the light of the ‘neighborhood-based’ algorithms
discussed by Herlocker et al. (2002), we therefore design a recommendation algorithm that is
based on the following principle: it creates a ‘neighborhood’ of
D M business partners that
a

have similar priorities to the properties wi of the active user, and examines how they have
evaluated
k (therefore, k K should hold in order for the recommendation algorithm to be
able to produce a prediction). That is, it bases its recommendation on the opinion of the
business partners that assign similar importance weights to the evaluation criteria. If we
assume that
z '∙l' is the number of members in the neighborhood, the goal of the
recommendation algorithm is to predict the total utility
u (k ) according to the z utilities
u (k ) of this e-market for each d D business partner in the neighborhood.

For this purpose, the similarity of the active user a to each user m M (denoted as sima,m’)
can be calculated using one of the classical measures used in recommendation literature
(Herlocker et al., 2002). In particular, we calculate similarity as the distance between the
vectors of the weights of the active user
a ( — = [w1, w2, w3 ] ) and each business partner
m         m′     m′     m

m (w_ - Iw1 , w2 , w3 J), using the Cosine metric:

( w × O

sima m =          =

,    7∑ (Wia)2 ×√3=,(wm')2      (4)

After the similarity of each business partner m with the active user a is calculated, the
neighborhood
D of business partners from which the prediction of ua(k’) can be produced is
either formulated by selecting only partners with similarity over a pre-defined threshold (called
Correlation Weight Threshold) or from a pre-defined maximum number of users (Max
Neighbors Number). Both options can be considered in our algorithm.



More intriguing information

1. The Impact of Hosting a Major Sport Event on the South African Economy
2. Shifting Identities and Blurring Boundaries: The Emergence of Third Space Professionals in UK Higher Education
3. Tariff Escalation and Invasive Species Risk
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. Putting Globalization and Concentration in the Agri-food Sector into Context
7. The name is absent
8. New Evidence on the Puzzles. Results from Agnostic Identification on Monetary Policy and Exchange Rates.
9. ISSUES IN NONMARKET VALUATION AND POLICY APPLICATION: A RETROSPECTIVE GLANCE
10. Ruptures in the probability scale. Calculation of ruptures’ values
11. The name is absent
12. Moffett and rhetoric
13. The name is absent
14. The name is absent
15. BILL 187 - THE AGRICULTURAL EMPLOYEES PROTECTION ACT: A SPECIAL REPORT
16. Education and Development: The Issues and the Evidence
17. The name is absent
18. Measuring and Testing Advertising-Induced Rotation in the Demand Curve
19. El impacto espacial de las economías de aglomeración y su efecto sobre la estructura urbana.El caso de la industria en Barcelona, 1986-1996
20. The Advantage of Cooperatives under Asymmetric Cost Information