Analyzing the Agricultural Trade Impacts of the Canada-Chile Free Trade Agreement



relative to other countries. Table 4 reports the estimation results for specification (1) with
different control groups (group of countries as comparison). Table 4 only reports the co-
efficient estimates on the FTA dummy (β
2) for the equation with Canadian imports. We
differentiate the control group with respect to geographic area and income level, following
the World Bank classification. Chilean agricultural exporters to Canada improved their per-
formance relative to those from richer countries with higher income levels. In particular, the
CCFTA improved the comparative advantage of Chilean agriculture relative to European,
East Asian, and, to some extent,12 Central and South American countries. At the same
time, Chile gained no trade advantage over countries with lower income level or African
countries. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that free trade agreements crowd
out the least productive competing importers, which are presumed to be concentrated in
high income countries with specialization in manufacturing goods.

Turning to the specification with Canadian exports in Table 5, the results for the basic
specifications (1) and (2) show that Canadian agricultural exports to Chile prior to the FTA
were not substantially different from that to the average country (insignificant β
1). The
coefficient β
2 is also always insignificant, meaning that Canadian exports to Chile were not
affected by the trade agreement. This result is robust to the inclusion of other variables
in columns (3) to (6). The coefficient on GDP is positive and significant, implying that
Canada sells more of its agricultural exports to larger countries. A positive coefficient on
agricultural land area leads to the same conclusion. The effect of the exchange rate on the
value of exports is positive, which implies that the appreciation of Canadian dollar tends

12 The coefficient on ‘Central and South America’ dummie is the higher one but its large standard error
indicate high variance in this effect across countries from comparative group.

13



More intriguing information

1. Education as a Moral Concept
2. Tax Increment Financing for Optimal Open Space Preservation: an Economic Inquiry
3. TECHNOLOGY AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT: THE CASE OF PATENTS AND FIRM LOCATION IN THE SPANISH MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS INDUSTRY.
4. The name is absent
5. Three Strikes and You.re Out: Reply to Cooper and Willis
6. A Regional Core, Adjacent, Periphery Model for National Economic Geography Analysis
7. Elicited bid functions in (a)symmetric first-price auctions
8. The name is absent
9. AN ANALYTICAL METHOD TO CALCULATE THE ERGODIC AND DIFFERENCE MATRICES OF THE DISCOUNTED MARKOV DECISION PROCESSES
10. Uncertain Productivity Growth and the Choice between FDI and Export
11. Demographic Features, Beliefs And Socio-Psychological Impact Of Acne Vulgaris Among Its Sufferers In Two Towns In Nigeria
12. Putting Globalization and Concentration in the Agri-food Sector into Context
13. The name is absent
14. The bank lending channel of monetary policy: identification and estimation using Portuguese micro bank data
15. The name is absent
16. Visual Perception of Humanoid Movement
17. The name is absent
18. Handling the measurement error problem by means of panel data: Moment methods applied on firm data
19. I nnovative Surgical Technique in the Management of Vallecular Cyst
20. Innovation Trajectories in Honduras’ Coffee Value Chain. Public and Private Influence on the Use of New Knowledge and Technology among Coffee Growers