A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ALTERNATIVE ECONOMETRIC PACKAGES: AN APPLICATION TO ITALIAN DEPOSIT INTEREST RATES



3500


3000 -


. 2500 -


φ 2000 -

E

О)

C

1 1500 -
Ω.


1000 -


500 -


0 4-
0


100      200     300     400     500     600     700     800     900

Number of replications


In order to have comparable results, the programs for the Monte Carlo experiments have been
written using the looping features made available by each package.


5.2 Bias and Monte Carlo Variability

The second and more important insight gained from the application of MCA1 is the evaluation of a
bias and a standard deviation for the Monte Carlo replications for each of the packages examined.

The following graphs show the behavior of the bias and the standard deviation around the Monte
Carlo mean computed for the coefficients of the Herfindahl concentration index and the normalized cost of
personnel:


14




More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. The name is absent
3. The Formation of Wenzhou Footwear Clusters: How Were the Entry Barriers Overcome?
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. GENE EXPRESSION AND ITS DISCONTENTS Developmental disorders as dysfunctions of epigenetic cognition
7. The Shepherd Sinfonia
8. AGRICULTURAL TRADE LIBERALIZATION UNDER NAFTA: REPORTING ON THE REPORT CARD
9. The name is absent
10. Inflation Targeting and Nonlinear Policy Rules: The Case of Asymmetric Preferences (new title: The Fed's monetary policy rule and U.S. inflation: The case of asymmetric preferences)
11. The name is absent
12. The name is absent
13. Environmental Regulation, Market Power and Price Discrimination in the Agricultural Chemical Industry
14. The name is absent
15. Searching Threshold Inflation for India
16. Estimation of marginal abatement costs for undesirable outputs in India's power generation sector: An output distance function approach.
17. Gender and aquaculture: sharing the benefits equitably
18. Auction Design without Commitment
19. Psychological Aspects of Market Crashes
20. Performance - Complexity Comparison of Receivers for a LTE MIMO–OFDM System