Orientation discrimination in WS 2



Orientation discrimination in WS 32

Table 1: Participant details

Group

RCPM: Mean(SD)

CA(years; months):

mean(SD)

Range (months)

WS (N=22)

17.68(4.89)

21;3 (8;8)

10;2-39;2

TD (N=22)

18.18 (4.89)

6;6 (1;6)

5;9-7;9

Note: scores of 17 and 18 on the RCPM represent the 50% percentile for a typical

child of 6;6 and 7;0 years respectively (Raven, Raven & Court, 1998)



More intriguing information

1. Foreign Direct Investment and Unequal Regional Economic Growth in China
2. The name is absent
3. Inflation and Inflation Uncertainty in the Euro Area
4. Analyse des verbraucherorientierten Qualitätsurteils mittels assoziativer Verfahren am Beispiel von Schweinefleisch und Kartoffeln
5. The name is absent
6. AGRICULTURAL TRADE IN THE URUGUAY ROUND: INTO FINAL BATTLE
7. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
8. CAPACITAÇÃO GERENCIAL DE AGRICULTORES FAMILIARES: UMA PROPOSTA METODOLÓGICA DE EXTENSÃO RURAL
9. Monetary Policy News and Exchange Rate Responses: Do Only Surprises Matter?
10. TLRP: academic challenges for moral purposes
11. ISO 9000 -- A MARKETING TOOL FOR U.S. AGRIBUSINESS
12. Qualifying Recital: Lisa Carol Hardaway, flute
13. Linkages between research, scholarship and teaching in universities in China
14. Outsourcing, Complementary Innovations and Growth
15. TRADE NEGOTIATIONS AND THE FUTURE OF AMERICAN AGRICULTURE
16. The name is absent
17. Ventas callejeras y espacio público: efectos sobre el comercio de Bogotá
18. Apprenticeships in the UK: from the industrial-relation via market-led and social inclusion models
19. If our brains were simple, we would be too simple to understand them.
20. Evolving robust and specialized car racing skills