Orientation discrimination in WS 2



Orientation discrimination in WS 34

Table 3: Participant details

Group

RCPM: mean (SD)

CA(years; months):

mean(SD)

Range (months)

WS (N=21)

18.00(5.13)

21;2(7;10)

11;0-33;4

TD (N=21

17.57(5.00)

6;3(0;6)

5;5-7;4

Note: scores of 17 and 18 on the RCPM represent the 50% percentile for a typical

child of 6;6 and 7;0 years respectively (Raven, Raven & Court, 1998)



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. News Not Noise: Socially Aware Information Filtering
3. Strategic Planning on the Local Level As a Factor of Rural Development in the Republic of Serbia
4. The Effects of Reforming the Chinese Dual-Track Price System
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. Urban Green Space Policies: Performance and Success Conditions in European Cities
8. Improvement of Access to Data Sets from the Official Statistics
9. Legal Minimum Wages and the Wages of Formal and Informal Sector Workers in Costa Rica
10. Migrating Football Players, Transfer Fees and Migration Controls
11. The name is absent
12. Migrant Business Networks and FDI
13. AN ANALYTICAL METHOD TO CALCULATE THE ERGODIC AND DIFFERENCE MATRICES OF THE DISCOUNTED MARKOV DECISION PROCESSES
14. Outline of a new approach to the nature of mind
15. ALTERNATIVE TRADE POLICIES
16. Industrial Cores and Peripheries in Brazil
17. Business Cycle Dynamics of a New Keynesian Overlapping Generations Model with Progressive Income Taxation
18. Psychological Aspects of Market Crashes
19. The name is absent
20. Human Development and Regional Disparities in Iran:A Policy Model