Orientation discrimination in WS 34
Table 3: Participant details
|
Group |
RCPM: mean (SD) |
CA(years; months): mean(SD) |
Range (months) |
|
WS (N=21) |
18.00(5.13) |
21;2(7;10) |
11;0-33;4 |
|
TD (N=21 |
17.57(5.00) |
6;3(0;6) |
5;5-7;4 |
Note: scores of 17 and 18 on the RCPM represent the 50% percentile for a typical
child of 6;6 and 7;0 years respectively (Raven, Raven & Court, 1998)
More intriguing information
1. Regional differentiation in the Russian federation: A cluster-based typification2. KNOWLEDGE EVOLUTION
3. Tax Increment Financing for Optimal Open Space Preservation: an Economic Inquiry
4. The Impact of Optimal Tariffs and Taxes on Agglomeration
5. Behavioural Characteristics and Financial Distress
6. Innovation and business performance - a provisional multi-regional analysis
7. Disturbing the fiscal theory of the price level: Can it fit the eu-15?
8. The name is absent
9. DEMAND FOR MEAT AND FISH PRODUCTS IN KOREA
10. Graphical Data Representation in Bankruptcy Analysis