Lumpy Investment, Sectoral Propagation, and Business Cycles



where δj is an industry specific depreciation rate. Investment ij,t is a composite good
produced by combining all the goods symmetrically as:

N

ij,t = N 1'<1-ξ>(∑⅛1)(1-ξvξ )' (1 '                           (3)

l=1

where ξ > 1 is the elasticity of substitution between inputs in the production of invest-
ment good.

We assume that the investment rate is chosen from a discrete set. Specifically, we
assume that:

ij,t/kj,t {(1 - δj)(λjκt - 1)}κt=012,...                           (4)

where λj > 1. Note that the choice space for kj,t is indepent of the path: kj,t
{
((1 δ)∕g)tkj,0λKt}κt=012,...∙ The assumption implies that the next period capital
kj,t+1 has to be either the naturally depreciated level kj∙,t(1 δj)/g or its multiplication
or division of λ
j . By this assumption, the producer is forced to invest in a lumpy
manner. Thus this constraint is a shortcut for the lumpy behavior which typically
occurs when a fixed cost incurs in investment. This is the only modification from
the usual model of monopolistic economies. The main objective of this paper is to
examine the aggregate consequence of a non-linear behavior of producers induced by
the discreteness constraint.

Let pj,t denote the price of good j at t. Define a price index pt
(jN=1 pj1/N)1^1-ξ> and normalize it to one. Let wt denote a real wage for an ef-
ficiency unit of labor. Then the monopolist’s profit (normalized by A
t) at t is written
as:

N

πj,t Pj,tyj,t - wthj,t - P,tzI,j,t                            (5)

l=1

The demand function for good j is derived by usual procedure as in Dixit and
Stiglitz (1977). Let us suppose that the representative household has a preference over
the sequence of consumption and labor:

βtU(Ct, ht)                                 (6)

t=0

where Ct = Atct is a composite consumption good produced identically as the invest-
ment good:

N

ct = N W>((zg)<1-ξ>'ξ )ξ<1-ξ>.                        (7)

l=1



More intriguing information

1. What Lessons for Economic Development Can We Draw from the Champagne Fairs?
2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Orientation discrimination in WS 2
5. The name is absent
6. ASSESSMENT OF MARKET RISK IN HOG PRODUCTION USING VALUE-AT-RISK AND EXTREME VALUE THEORY
7. Emissions Trading, Electricity Industry Restructuring and Investment in Pollution Abatement
8. Innovation and business performance - a provisional multi-regional analysis
9. TOWARD CULTURAL ONCOLOGY: THE EVOLUTIONARY INFORMATION DYNAMICS OF CANCER
10. IMPLICATIONS OF CHANGING AID PROGRAMS TO U.S. AGRICULTURE