Lumpy Investment, Sectoral Propagation, and Business Cycles



where δj is an industry specific depreciation rate. Investment ij,t is a composite good
produced by combining all the goods symmetrically as:

N

ij,t = N 1'<1-ξ>(∑⅛1)(1-ξvξ )' (1 '                           (3)

l=1

where ξ > 1 is the elasticity of substitution between inputs in the production of invest-
ment good.

We assume that the investment rate is chosen from a discrete set. Specifically, we
assume that:

ij,t/kj,t {(1 - δj)(λjκt - 1)}κt=012,...                           (4)

where λj > 1. Note that the choice space for kj,t is indepent of the path: kj,t
{
((1 δ)∕g)tkj,0λKt}κt=012,...∙ The assumption implies that the next period capital
kj,t+1 has to be either the naturally depreciated level kj∙,t(1 δj)/g or its multiplication
or division of λ
j . By this assumption, the producer is forced to invest in a lumpy
manner. Thus this constraint is a shortcut for the lumpy behavior which typically
occurs when a fixed cost incurs in investment. This is the only modification from
the usual model of monopolistic economies. The main objective of this paper is to
examine the aggregate consequence of a non-linear behavior of producers induced by
the discreteness constraint.

Let pj,t denote the price of good j at t. Define a price index pt
(jN=1 pj1/N)1^1-ξ> and normalize it to one. Let wt denote a real wage for an ef-
ficiency unit of labor. Then the monopolist’s profit (normalized by A
t) at t is written
as:

N

πj,t Pj,tyj,t - wthj,t - P,tzI,j,t                            (5)

l=1

The demand function for good j is derived by usual procedure as in Dixit and
Stiglitz (1977). Let us suppose that the representative household has a preference over
the sequence of consumption and labor:

βtU(Ct, ht)                                 (6)

t=0

where Ct = Atct is a composite consumption good produced identically as the invest-
ment good:

N

ct = N W>((zg)<1-ξ>'ξ )ξ<1-ξ>.                        (7)

l=1



More intriguing information

1. Credit Markets and the Propagation of Monetary Policy Shocks
2. A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON UNDERINVESTMENT IN AGRICULTURAL R&D
3. IMMIGRATION AND AGRICULTURAL LABOR POLICIES
4. Yield curve analysis
5. Testing for One-Factor Models versus Stochastic Volatility Models
6. The name is absent
7. ALTERNATIVE TRADE POLICIES
8. Industrial districts, innovation and I-district effect: territory or industrial specialization?
9. Strategic Effects and Incentives in Multi-issue Bargaining Games
10. The name is absent