A Consistent Nonparametric Test for Causality in Quantile



Appendix

Here we collect all required assumptions to establish the results of Theorem 1.

(A1) (i) {yt,wt} is strictly stationary and absolutely regular with mixing coefficients

β(τ) = O(ρτ) for some 0 < ρ < 1.

(ii) For some integer v2, fy, fz, and fx all are bounded and belong to A v (see

D2).

(iii) with probability one,    E[εt | μ-∞ (z), μ-∞1(z)] = 0

<∞ and


E Иεii2∙∙∙εtl


1+ξ


<∞


for some arbitrarily small η> 0 and ξ> 0, where 2l4 is


an integer, 0ij4


and  ij 8 . σl (z) = E(ε21 z) ,  με4 (z) = E ' ε/ | zt = z ]  all

j=1

satisfy some Lipschitz


conditions: α(u + v) - a(u) D(u)∣∣v∣∣ with E D(z)2+η


<∞


for some small η ' 0, where a() = σ2ε (), με4 () .


(iv) Let fτ,K,τ() be the joint probability density function of (zτ ,K ,zτ


Then     fτ,K,τ( ) is bounded and satisfies a Lipschitz condition:


lfτ1,κ,τi ( z1 + u1, z 2 + u 2,∙∙∙ zl + U )-fι,,...,τi ( z1, z 2,k zl


τl(z1,K,zl


Dτ,K,τ() is integrable and satisfies the condition that Dτκτι( zι,κ, z )l Izl I2 ξ <M<∞,


Dτ1,K,τl(z1,K,zl


z1,K,zl) dz< M<∞ for some ξ> 1.


(v) For any y, x satisfying


0< Fy|x(y|x)< 1 and fx(x)> 0; for fixed y , the


conditional distribution function


Fy|x and the conditional density function fy|x belong to


A 3; fyx (Qθ (x)| x) 0 for all


x ; fy|x is uniformly bounded in x and y by cf , say.


(vi) For some compact set G , there are ε> 0,γ >0 such that fxγ for all x in the


ε -neighborhood {x 11x - u∣∣ε, u G } of G ; For the compact set G and some




More intriguing information

1. Smith and Rawls Share a Room
2. Does adult education at upper secondary level influence annual wage earnings?
3. The name is absent
4. The Dynamic Cost of the Draft
5. A Hybrid Neural Network and Virtual Reality System for Spatial Language Processing
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Migration and Technological Change in Rural Households: Complements or Substitutes?
10. The name is absent