Notes on an Endogenous Growth Model with two Capital Stocks II: The Stochastic Case



Indeed these coefficients imply that the function v(h, k, A) is below the upper bound.
The policy functions associated with
v are given by:

ht+1 = B β+τwβ(1-β) ht,                                       (48)

a ,   _ nR- αah1-α+γ ( τw(1-β) ʌ                           ('40'1

kt+1 = αβAtkt ht      ^β+τw(1-β) J    •                   (49)

Hence, given any initial state s0 = (k0, h0, ha,0, A0), the plan π1* [, s0] generated by the
first policy rule can be calculated explicitly. Using this plan we also can calculate the
second plan
π2*[, s0]; in logs, they are:

lnt1*ιMo] = tlnB +1ln [β+τ(1-β)] + lnho,

t-1

ln2*1[,so] = αi(ln[αβ] + (1 - α) ln +     '    + (1 α) ln ho + Yln ha,o)

i=0

t-1                                                                 t-1

+ ^ ʌ αii (1 α + γ) βlιι [β+τwβ1-β) ] + ln B^ + αt ln ko +^ ʌ αt 1 iAi
i=o                                                         i=o

It remains only to be shown that conditions (a) and (b) of Theorem 3 hold. In order
to verify that the plans
π1*[, s0] and π2*[, s0] satisfy condition (a), we have to show that
(37) holds for all (
s0) when applying π1*[, s0] and π2*[, s0], where v is given by (47). In
our case we consider:

V [∏1-*1 (At-1,ha-1) ,∏2-*1 (At-1,ha-1) ,At,ha,t]

= Ψ + ψΒ ln B + h + ψha ) βt ln B + t ln [β+∙7-wβ1-β)] + + ψh ln h0 + ψha ln ha,0
t-1

k ɑt ln k0 k ^ αi (ln[αβ] + (1 - α) ln [ β+w,(,1(1-β) ] +(1 - α) ln h0+γ ln ha,0
i=0

t-1

+ψkαii (1 - α + γ) (ln [β+τwβ(1-β)]
i=0


t-1

+ ln B) + φk    αt 1 iAi + ψA ln At

i=0


Using the fact that 0 < β < 1, 0 < αβ < 1, and E0 [ln At] = ρt lnA0, it is straightforward
to show that condition (37) indeed holds
12 .

In order to verify condition (b) we need to show that for any initial state (s0) S,
any plan in Π(
s0) is weakly dominated by a plan in Π(s0). Let (s0) S and π Π(s0)
be arbitrary. By definition
π Π∏(s0) if and only if (37) holds. With v given by (47),
condition (37) reads as follows:

lim βtE0[√ + ψa ln At + ψha ln hat + .. i ln πt1-1[At-1 X-1 ] + ψk ln п2л [At-1 ,ht-1]] =0,
t→∞

where φ' := φ + φB ln B. It follows from the assumptions on the At’s that

lim βtE0 ∣^φA ln At"∣ = lim (ρβ)t r'A ln A0 = 0.
t→∞              t→∞

Furthermore, note that the path of ln ha,t is bounded by t ln B +ln ha,0. Hence condition
(37) holds if and only if:

lim βtE0[^h ln πt1-1 [At-1] + φk ln π21[At-1]l = 0.                   (50)

t→∞

12Note, that for β (0, 1) limt→∞ tβt = 0 holds.

21



More intriguing information

1. PROTECTING CONTRACT GROWERS OF BROILER CHICKEN INDUSTRY
2. How much do Educational Outcomes Matter in OECD Countries?
3. The name is absent
4. Activation of s28-dependent transcription in Escherichia coli by the cyclic AMP receptor protein requires an unusual promoter organization
5. On the Integration of Digital Technologies into Mathematics Classrooms
6. Evaluating the Impact of Health Programmes
7. ‘Goodwill is not enough’
8. The name is absent
9. A Rare Case Of Fallopian Tube Cancer
10. Understanding the (relative) fall and rise of construction wages
11. Climate Policy under Sustainable Discounted Utilitarianism
12. On s-additive robust representation of convex risk measures for unbounded financial positions in the presence of uncertainty about the market model
13. Gender stereotyping and wage discrimination among Italian graduates
14. FOREIGN AGRICULTURAL SERVICE PROGRAMS AND FOREIGN RELATIONS
15. The name is absent
16. Happiness in Eastern Europe
17. Gender and headship in the twenty-first century
18. How does an infant acquire the ability of joint attention?: A Constructive Approach
19. The name is absent
20. Retirement and the Poverty of the Elderly in Portugal