The Impact of Individual Investment Behavior for Retirement Welfare: Evidence from the United States and Germany



An important topic for future research is determining which public policy measure or
mix of measures—for example, investments in financial education24 or advice for
asset allocation default options in pension plans25—should be implemented to
achieve the maximum welfare gain. Combining knowledge about the welfare
contributions of various policy measures with the results on the location of welfare
losses presented in this paper should help considerably to meet the demographic
challenges ahead.

References

Agnew, J., P. Balduzzi, and A. Sunden (2003), Portfolio Choice and Trading in a
Large 401 (k) Plan,
The American Economic Review, 93: 193-215.

Ameriks, J., and S. Zeldes (2004), How do Household Portfolios Vary with Age,
mimeo, Columbia University.

Arias, E. (2006), United States Life Tables, 2003, National Vital Statistics Report,
54: 1-40.

Bajtelsmit, V. L., and N. A. Jianakoplos (2000), Women and Pensions: A Decade of
Progress?,
EBRIA Issues Brief, 227: 1-15.

Bajtelsmit, V. L., and J. L. VanDerhei (1997), Risk aversion and Pension Investment
Choices, in: Michael S. Gordon, Olivia S. Mitchell, and Marc M. Twinney (eds.),
Positioning Pensions for the Twenty-First Century (Philadelphia: The Pension
Research Council & University of Pennsylvania Press), 45-66.

Banks, J., R. Blundell, Z. Oldfield, and J. P. Smith (2007), Housing Price Volatility
and Downsizing in Later Life,
NBER Working Paper No. 13496, Cambridge
(MA).

Barsky, R. B., F. T. Juster, M. S. Kimball, and M. D. Shapiro (1997), Preference
Parameters and Behavioral Heterogeneity: An Experimental Approach in the
Health and Retirement Study,
The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112: 537-
579.

Behr, A., E. Bellgardt, and U. Rendtel (2003), The estimation of male earnings under
panel attrition. A cross country comparison based on the European Community

24 See footnote 3.

25 The power of default options—the tendency that pension plan members stick to
predefined asset allocations—is demonstrated in Beshears et al. (2006). Thus, one can
reach desired asset allocation results while avoiding too much regulatory force.

32



More intriguing information

1. Individual tradable permit market and traffic congestion: An experimental study
2. The name is absent
3. Evolution of cognitive function via redeployment of brain areas
4. A Duality Approach to Testing the Economic Behaviour of Dairy-Marketing Co-operatives: The Case of Ireland
5. THE CHANGING RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
6. The Response of Ethiopian Grain Markets to Liberalization
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Naïve Bayes vs. Decision Trees vs. Neural Networks in the Classification of Training Web Pages
10. The name is absent