The Impact of Individual Investment Behavior for Retirement Welfare: Evidence from the United States and Germany



An important topic for future research is determining which public policy measure or
mix of measures—for example, investments in financial education24 or advice for
asset allocation default options in pension plans25—should be implemented to
achieve the maximum welfare gain. Combining knowledge about the welfare
contributions of various policy measures with the results on the location of welfare
losses presented in this paper should help considerably to meet the demographic
challenges ahead.

References

Agnew, J., P. Balduzzi, and A. Sunden (2003), Portfolio Choice and Trading in a
Large 401 (k) Plan,
The American Economic Review, 93: 193-215.

Ameriks, J., and S. Zeldes (2004), How do Household Portfolios Vary with Age,
mimeo, Columbia University.

Arias, E. (2006), United States Life Tables, 2003, National Vital Statistics Report,
54: 1-40.

Bajtelsmit, V. L., and N. A. Jianakoplos (2000), Women and Pensions: A Decade of
Progress?,
EBRIA Issues Brief, 227: 1-15.

Bajtelsmit, V. L., and J. L. VanDerhei (1997), Risk aversion and Pension Investment
Choices, in: Michael S. Gordon, Olivia S. Mitchell, and Marc M. Twinney (eds.),
Positioning Pensions for the Twenty-First Century (Philadelphia: The Pension
Research Council & University of Pennsylvania Press), 45-66.

Banks, J., R. Blundell, Z. Oldfield, and J. P. Smith (2007), Housing Price Volatility
and Downsizing in Later Life,
NBER Working Paper No. 13496, Cambridge
(MA).

Barsky, R. B., F. T. Juster, M. S. Kimball, and M. D. Shapiro (1997), Preference
Parameters and Behavioral Heterogeneity: An Experimental Approach in the
Health and Retirement Study,
The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112: 537-
579.

Behr, A., E. Bellgardt, and U. Rendtel (2003), The estimation of male earnings under
panel attrition. A cross country comparison based on the European Community

24 See footnote 3.

25 The power of default options—the tendency that pension plan members stick to
predefined asset allocations—is demonstrated in Beshears et al. (2006). Thus, one can
reach desired asset allocation results while avoiding too much regulatory force.

32



More intriguing information

1. A Consistent Nonparametric Test for Causality in Quantile
2. Comparison of Optimal Control Solutions in a Labor Market Model
3. Insurance within the firm
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. Can genetic algorithms explain experimental anomalies? An application to common property resources
7. Quelles politiques de développement durable au Mali et à Madagascar ?
8. Reversal of Fortune: Macroeconomic Policy, International Finance, and Banking in Japan
9. DEMAND FOR MEAT AND FISH PRODUCTS IN KOREA
10. Contribution of Economics to Design of Sustainable Cattle Breeding Programs in Eastern Africa: A Choice Experiment Approach