The Impact of Individual Investment Behavior for Retirement Welfare: Evidence from the United States and Germany



An important topic for future research is determining which public policy measure or
mix of measures—for example, investments in financial education24 or advice for
asset allocation default options in pension plans25—should be implemented to
achieve the maximum welfare gain. Combining knowledge about the welfare
contributions of various policy measures with the results on the location of welfare
losses presented in this paper should help considerably to meet the demographic
challenges ahead.

References

Agnew, J., P. Balduzzi, and A. Sunden (2003), Portfolio Choice and Trading in a
Large 401 (k) Plan,
The American Economic Review, 93: 193-215.

Ameriks, J., and S. Zeldes (2004), How do Household Portfolios Vary with Age,
mimeo, Columbia University.

Arias, E. (2006), United States Life Tables, 2003, National Vital Statistics Report,
54: 1-40.

Bajtelsmit, V. L., and N. A. Jianakoplos (2000), Women and Pensions: A Decade of
Progress?,
EBRIA Issues Brief, 227: 1-15.

Bajtelsmit, V. L., and J. L. VanDerhei (1997), Risk aversion and Pension Investment
Choices, in: Michael S. Gordon, Olivia S. Mitchell, and Marc M. Twinney (eds.),
Positioning Pensions for the Twenty-First Century (Philadelphia: The Pension
Research Council & University of Pennsylvania Press), 45-66.

Banks, J., R. Blundell, Z. Oldfield, and J. P. Smith (2007), Housing Price Volatility
and Downsizing in Later Life,
NBER Working Paper No. 13496, Cambridge
(MA).

Barsky, R. B., F. T. Juster, M. S. Kimball, and M. D. Shapiro (1997), Preference
Parameters and Behavioral Heterogeneity: An Experimental Approach in the
Health and Retirement Study,
The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112: 537-
579.

Behr, A., E. Bellgardt, and U. Rendtel (2003), The estimation of male earnings under
panel attrition. A cross country comparison based on the European Community

24 See footnote 3.

25 The power of default options—the tendency that pension plan members stick to
predefined asset allocations—is demonstrated in Beshears et al. (2006). Thus, one can
reach desired asset allocation results while avoiding too much regulatory force.

32



More intriguing information

1. Standards behaviours face to innovation of the entrepreneurships of Beira Interior
2. The name is absent
3. INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS AND GROUP PROCESSES
4. Herman Melville and the Problem of Evil
5. Business Networks and Performance: A Spatial Approach
6. Motivations, Values and Emotions: Three Sides of the same Coin
7. 09-01 "Resources, Rules and International Political Economy: The Politics of Development in the WTO"
8. INSTITUTIONS AND PRICE TRANSMISSION IN THE VIETNAMESE HOG MARKET
9. The name is absent
10. APPLYING BIOSOLIDS: ISSUES FOR VIRGINIA AGRICULTURE
11. The name is absent
12. The name is absent
13. Improvements in medical care and technology and reductions in traffic-related fatalities in Great Britain
14. Conservation Payments, Liquidity Constraints and Off-Farm Labor: Impact of the Grain for Green Program on Rural Households in China
15. Telecommuting and environmental policy - lessons from the Ecommute program
16. XML PUBLISHING SOLUTIONS FOR A COMPANY
17. The name is absent
18. Social Cohesion as a Real-life Phenomenon: Exploring the Validity of the Universalist and Particularist Perspectives
19. Applications of Evolutionary Economic Geography
20. The name is absent