The influence of infinitesimal contamination on an estimator is charac-
terized by the influence function, which measures the relative change in es-
timates caused by an infinitesimally small amount ε of contamination at x
(Hampel et al., 1986). More formally,
IF(x; T, F) = lim T{(1 - ε)F + εδx} - T(F). (1)
ε→0 ε
For each point г, the influence function reveals the rate at which the esti-
mator T changes if a wrong observation appears at г. In the case of sample
mean x = T(Fn) for {xi}n=1, we obtain
(1 - ε) udFn(u) + ε udδx (u) - udFn (u) /ε
г; T, Fn ) = lim
ε→0
= lim
- udFn(u) + udδx (u)
ε→0
The influence function allows us to define various desirable properties
of an estimation method. First, the largest influence of contamination on
estimates can be formalized by the gross-error sensitivity,
γ(T,F) = supIF(x;T,F), (2)
x∈R
which under robustness considerations be finite and small. Even though such
a measure can depend on F in general, the qualitative results (e.g., γ(T, F)
being bounded) are typically independent of F. Second, the sensitivity to
small changes in data, for example moving an observation from x to y ∈ R,
can be measured by the local-shift sensitivity
λT Fy-F ( χ ; T,F ) - 1F ( y ; T-F ) k rn
λ ( T’F ) = ----------iF-yii----------• (3)
More intriguing information
1. Does Presenting Patients’ BMI Increase Documentation of Obesity?2. The quick and the dead: when reaction beats intention
3. Influence of Mucilage Viscosity On The Globule Structure And Stability Of Certain Starch Emulsions
4. Psychological Aspects of Market Crashes
5. The name is absent
6. Neighborhood Effects, Public Housing and Unemployment in France
7. A Consistent Nonparametric Test for Causality in Quantile
8. Financial Development and Sectoral Output Growth in 19th Century Germany
9. Before and After the Hartz Reforms: The Performance of Active Labour Market Policy in Germany
10. The Response of Ethiopian Grain Markets to Liberalization