Robust Econometrics



The influence of infinitesimal contamination on an estimator is charac-
terized by the
influence function, which measures the relative change in es-
timates caused by an infinitesimally small amount
ε of contamination at x
(Hampel et al., 1986). More formally,

IF(x; T, F) = lim T{(1 - ε)F + εδx} - T(F).            (1)

ε→0              ε

For each point г, the influence function reveals the rate at which the esti-
mator
T changes if a wrong observation appears at г. In the case of sample
mean
x = T(Fn) for {xi}n=1, we obtain

(1 - ε)   udFn(u) + ε udδx (u) -   udFn (u)


г; T, Fn ) = lim
ε→0

= lim

- udFn(u) + udδx (u)


ε→0

The influence function allows us to define various desirable properties
of an estimation method. First, the largest influence of contamination on
estimates can be formalized by the
gross-error sensitivity,

γ(T,F) = supIF(x;T,F),                     (2)

xR

which under robustness considerations be finite and small. Even though such
a measure can depend on
F in general, the qualitative results (e.g., γ(T, F)
being bounded) are typically independent of
F. Second, the sensitivity to
small changes in data, for example moving an observation from
x to y R,
can be measured by the
local-shift sensitivity

λT Fy-F ( χ ; T,F ) - 1F ( y ; T-F ) k             rn

λ ( T’F ) =    ----------iF-yii----------              (3)



More intriguing information

1. Smith and Rawls Share a Room
2. Review of “The Hesitant Hand: Taming Self-Interest in the History of Economic Ideas”
3. AN ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF THE COLORADO RIVER BASIN SALINITY CONTROL PROGRAM
4. Intertemporal Risk Management Decisions of Farmers under Preference, Market, and Policy Dynamics
5. Yield curve analysis
6. Death as a Fateful Moment? The Reflexive Individual and Scottish Funeral Practices
7. Unilateral Actions the Case of International Environmental Problems
8. Ongoing Emergence: A Core Concept in Epigenetic Robotics
9. The name is absent
10. Public-private sector pay differentials in a devolved Scotland