The influence of infinitesimal contamination on an estimator is charac-
terized by the influence function, which measures the relative change in es-
timates caused by an infinitesimally small amount ε of contamination at x
(Hampel et al., 1986). More formally,
IF(x; T, F) = lim T{(1 - ε)F + εδx} - T(F). (1)
ε→0 ε
For each point г, the influence function reveals the rate at which the esti-
mator T changes if a wrong observation appears at г. In the case of sample
mean x = T(Fn) for {xi}n=1, we obtain
(1 - ε) udFn(u) + ε udδx (u) - udFn (u) /ε
г; T, Fn ) = lim
ε→0
= lim
- udFn(u) + udδx (u)
ε→0
The influence function allows us to define various desirable properties
of an estimation method. First, the largest influence of contamination on
estimates can be formalized by the gross-error sensitivity,
γ(T,F) = supIF(x;T,F), (2)
x∈R
which under robustness considerations be finite and small. Even though such
a measure can depend on F in general, the qualitative results (e.g., γ(T, F)
being bounded) are typically independent of F. Second, the sensitivity to
small changes in data, for example moving an observation from x to y ∈ R,
can be measured by the local-shift sensitivity
λT Fy-F ( χ ; T,F ) - 1F ( y ; T-F ) k rn
λ ( T’F ) = ----------iF-yii----------• (3)
More intriguing information
1. Do imputed education histories provide satisfactory results in fertility analysis in the Western German context?2. LOCAL PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES TO HELP FARM PEOPLE ADJUST
3. Developmental Robots - A New Paradigm
4. ‘Goodwill is not enough’
5. Intertemporal Risk Management Decisions of Farmers under Preference, Market, and Policy Dynamics
6. Pupils’ attitudes towards art teaching in primary school: an evaluation tool
7. Pass-through of external shocks along the pricing chain: A panel estimation approach for the euro area
8. The name is absent
9. GROWTH, UNEMPLOYMENT AND THE WAGE SETTING PROCESS.
10. Running head: CHILDREN'S ATTRIBUTIONS OF BELIEFS