Table 1: CEO Ownership
This table reports the number of firms in which the CEO owns more than a specific cutoff of the firms outstanding
stocks. The respective cutoffs for managerial ownership are given in the first column. The number of all firms in
our dataset in the respective year are reported in the ’total’ rows. Panel A provides information for all S&P 500
sample firms for each year from 1992 to 2003. Panel B provides information for all S&P 3500 sample firms for
each year from 1994 to 2003.
Panei A: S&P 500 index
|
w Cl |
Year |
1992 |
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
|
total |
478 |
488 |
488 |
485 |
490 |
490 |
487 |
494 |
489 |
495 |
498 |
499 | |
|
>0% |
96 |
129 |
137 |
109 |
107 |
116 |
121 |
140 |
157 |
159 |
159 |
168 | |
|
>5% |
33 |
39 |
37 |
38 |
37 |
41 |
42 |
47 |
45 |
43 |
37 |
35 | |
|
>10% |
19 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
28 |
30 |
32 |
30 |
30 |
24 |
19 | |
|
>15% |
11 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
15 |
16 |
18 |
16 |
13 |
14 |
11 |
9 | |
|
>20% |
9 |
8 |
7 |
10 |
9 |
8 |
9 |
8 |
6 |
5 |
5 |
4 | |
|
>25% |
3 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
3 | |
|
>30% |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
1 | |
|
>50% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 | |
|
Panel B: S&P |
1500 Index | ||||||||||||
|
total |
1,468 |
1,462 |
1,472 |
1,452 |
1,451 |
1,452 |
1,463 |
1,480 |
1,479 |
1,455 | |||
|
>0% |
798 |
760 |
755 |
748 |
744 |
801 |
856 |
825 |
868 |
864 | |||
|
>5% |
295 |
279 |
261 |
254 |
256 |
270 |
261 |
232 |
217 |
195 | |||
|
>10% |
187 |
177 |
164 |
159 |
163 |
174 |
165 |
143 |
131 |
117 | |||
|
>15% |
114 |
109 |
100 |
101 |
105 |
113 |
102 |
87 |
78 |
69 | |||
|
>20% |
77 |
81 |
67 |
64 |
64 |
71 |
68 |
57 |
50 |
43 | |||
|
>25% |
49 |
47 |
39 |
41 |
41 |
51 |
46 |
36 |
33 |
27 | |||
|
>30% |
26 |
26 |
26 |
27 |
29 |
32 |
25 |
22 |
20 |
18 | |||
|
>50% |
3 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
3 | |||
More intriguing information
1. Manufacturing Earnings and Cycles: New Evidence2. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in patients with ICDs and Pacemakers
3. Migration and employment status during the turbulent nineties in Sweden
4. An Intertemporal Benchmark Model for Turkey’s Current Account
5. The name is absent
6. Der Einfluß der Direktdemokratie auf die Sozialpolitik
7. Governance Control Mechanisms in Portuguese Agricultural Credit Cooperatives
8. Family, social security and social insurance: General remarks and the present discussion in Germany as a case study
9. Making International Human Rights Protection More Effective: A Rational-Choice Approach to the Effectiveness of Ius Standi Provisions
10. Voting by Committees under Constraints