Table 3: Managerial Ownership Portfolios
This table describes estimation results of the four factor model Model (1)
as described in the main text for value-weighted managerial ownership
portfolios. Portfolios are constructed based on the fraction of the firm’s out-
standing shares owned by the officer with the highest managerial ownership.
The cutoff for managerial ownership of the respective portfolio is based on
the Execucomp data-item Shrownpc and is given in the first column. Stocks
are selected from the S&P 1500 and S&P 500 universe, respectively. Alphas
are on a monthly basis. Standard errors are in parentheses. The number
of months used to estimate the model is given in the last column. ***, **,
and * indicate significance at the one, five, and ten percent level, respectively.
Panel A: S&P 1500
|
Shrown |
α |
RMRF |
SMB |
HML |
Mom. |
Obs. |
|
>5 |
0.684** ( 0.283 ) |
1.112*** ( 0.068 ) |
-0.136* ( 0.072 ) |
-0.396*** ( 0.092 ) |
-0.043 ( 0.039 ) |
120 |
|
>7.5 |
0.809*** ( 0.308 ) |
1.118*** ( 0.074 ) |
-0.188** ( 0.079 ) |
-0.47*** ( 0.1 ) |
-0.05 ( 0.043 ) |
120 |
|
>10 |
0.953*** ( 0.339 ) |
1.115*** ( 0.081 ) |
-0.239*** ( 0.087 ) |
-0.547*** ( 0.11 ) |
-0.034 ( 0.047 ) |
120 |
|
>12.5 |
1.121*** ( 0.385 ) |
1.201*** ( 0.093 ) |
-0.211** ( 0.099 ) |
-0.546*** ( 0.125 ) |
-0.039 ( 0.054 ) |
120 |
|
>15 1.261*** ( 0.42 ) Panel B: S&P 500 |
1.163*** ( 0.101 ) |
-0.185* ( 0.107 ) |
-0.566*** ( 0.136 ) |
-0.04 ( 0.059 ) |
120 | |
|
Shrown |
α |
RMRF |
SMB |
HML |
Mom. |
Obs. |
|
>5 |
0.777** ( 0.314 ) |
1.031*** ( 0.079 ) |
-0.277*** ( 0.086 ) |
-0.59*** ( 0.108 ) |
-0.085* ( 0.047 ) |
144 |
|
>7.5 |
0.893*** ( 0.335 ) |
1.033*** ( 0.085 ) |
-0.317*** ( 0.092 ) |
-0.649*** ( 0.115 ) |
-0.091* ( 0.051 ) |
144 |
|
>10 |
1.038*** ( 0.362 ) |
1.023*** ( 0.091 ) |
-0.356*** ( 0.1 ) |
-0.725*** ( 0.124 ) |
-0.073 ( 0.055 ) |
144 |
|
>12.5 |
1.199*** ( 0.41 ) |
1.11*** ( 0.104 ) |
-0.31*** ( 0.113 ) |
-0.728*** ( 0.141 ) |
-0.084 ( 0.062 ) |
144 |
|
>15 |
1.038*** ( 0.362 ) |
1.023*** ( 0.091 ) |
-0.356*** ( 0.1 ) |
-0.725*** ( 0.124 ) |
-0.073 ( 0.055 ) |
144 |
37
More intriguing information
1. Improving the Impact of Market Reform on Agricultural Productivity in Africa: How Institutional Design Makes a Difference2. Fighting windmills? EU industrial interests and global climate negotiations
3. How we might be able to understand the brain
4. The name is absent
5. Towards Learning Affective Body Gesture
6. Regional Intergration and Migration: An Economic Geography Model with Hetergenous Labour Force
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Bargaining Power and Equilibrium Consumption
10. Towards a Strategy for Improving Agricultural Inputs Markets in Africa