3.3 ... WHEN 0 <½<1
I have runsimu Iaticns fθrtheintermediatecaseinwhich technical ineXciency
is neither totally genetic nor totally stochastic, in other words under the
hypcthesis that0 < ½ < 1.
Figure4 sketches theresults cfthe dynamics cfasingledynasty’swealth
cver100 period, 1Crdi≡erentΛθIuescfpersisterιce Panel (a) iscb>tainedwith
½ = 0:5; panel(b) with ½ = 0:9 and panel(c) with ½ = 0:0001:
Onlywhen entrepreneurialskills are highly inheritable the dynasty dces
nctqualify and ccnverges tc0.69, thatis tcthe steady state wealth cfncn-
cu∣ali...ed workers.

Figure 4: wealth accumulation dynamics fora single dynasty over
100 periods.
I havealscrun numericalsimulaticns fcr1500 dynasties cver200 pericds.
The distributicn cfwealth after200 pericds, in each scenaric, is sketched in
.gure5. P anels I (b), II, III (b) andIV arebasedcn ½ = 0:5: P anels I (a) and
III (a) instead are based cn ½ = 0:9:Ccmparing panels I (a) and I (b) and
ccmparingIII (a) andIII (b), wecan easilyncticethat, thehigherthedegree
cfskills inheritability, i.e. thegreater½; themcreplausiblemultipleecuilibria
are and the dynamics are similartcthe perfectgeneticcase (½ = 1) :
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Name Strategy: Its Existence and Implications
3. Mergers and the changing landscape of commercial banking (Part II)
4. Workforce or Workfare?
5. The name is absent
6. Should Local Public Employment Services be Merged with the Local Social Benefit Administrations?
7. The name is absent
8. Influence of Mucilage Viscosity On The Globule Structure And Stability Of Certain Starch Emulsions
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent