The Impact of Financial Openness on Economic Integration: Evidence from the Europe and the Cis



Empirical definition of financial openness and international financial integration
Crucial to the estimation of equations (3) and (6) is the empirical definition of the
variable
z, the degree of financial openness. This should capture the extent to which a
country does not restrict capital movements across borders. At the same time,
however, it should not be based on the actual volume of cross-holdings of foreign
assets and liabilities, as in this case it would be a measure of international financial
integration rather than financial openness. A suitable strategy, indeed rather common
in the literature, is to construct an index of capital account liberalisation using the
information available from the IMF's
Annual Report on Exchange Arrangements and
Exchange Restrictions
(AREAR) 16. We follow the approach proposed by Chinn and
Ito (2001) and construct our variable
z as follows.

From the AREAR we define for each country and each year four dummies: (i) R1
takes value 1 in the absence of multiple exchange rates, (ii) R2 takes value 1 if current
account transactions are not restricted, and (iii)
R3 takes value 1 if capital account
transactions are not restricted, (iv)
R4 takes value 1 in the absence of a requirement of
surrender of export proceeds. A variable SHARE
3 is then constructed for each year as
the average of
R3 in that year and in the four preceding years. Finally, z is obtained for
each country and each year as the first standardised principal component of
R1, R2,
SHARE3 and R4. Thus, z is a indicator of overall cross-border capital liberalisation:
higher values denote greater financial openness.

Equations (3) and (6) will also be estimated replacing the indicator of financial
openness
z by two measures of international financial integration taken from Lane and
Milesi-Ferretti (2003):
where, as usual,
i denotes a country and t a given year, FA is the stock of foreign
assets,
FL is the stock of foreign liabilities, PEA and PEL are the stocks of portfolio
equity assets and liabilities respectively,
FDIA and FDIL are the stock of foreign
direct investment assets and liabilities respectively. Thus, the variable
p1 measures the

p1,it


FAit + FLit
GDPit


and


p2,it


PEAit + PELit + FDIAit + FDLit
GDPit


16 See Miniane (2004) for a survey of various approaches adopted in the construction of such indices.

11



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. The name is absent
3. Smith and Rawls Share a Room
4. The name is absent
5. Getting the practical teaching element right: A guide for literacy, numeracy and ESOL teacher educators
6. A simple enquiry on heterogeneous lending rates and lending behaviour
7. Should Local Public Employment Services be Merged with the Local Social Benefit Administrations?
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent
11. Consumer Networks and Firm Reputation: A First Experimental Investigation
12. Foreign Direct Investment and Unequal Regional Economic Growth in China
13. KNOWLEDGE EVOLUTION
14. How we might be able to understand the brain
15. The name is absent
16. Wirkt eine Preisregulierung nur auf den Preis?: Anmerkungen zu den Wirkungen einer Preisregulierung auf das Werbevolumen
17. Stable Distributions
18. An Efficient Secure Multimodal Biometric Fusion Using Palmprint and Face Image
19. Restricted Export Flexibility and Risk Management with Options and Futures
20. Quality Enhancement for E-Learning Courses: The Role of Student Feedback