Imperfect competition and congestion in the City



dgi(wi) -1
dwi


dPw

pw + gi(wi) - Wi - c - hPW]     = 0.

dwi

Substituting the expressions (34) and (33), the first-order condition, at the
symmetric candidate equilibrium reduces to:

Γμd h + Λd 1

Lμw y ' nd n


(pe - We


( n1Й + 1 + λw 1
∖ n / ∕         μw n

- c - Λh 2 ¢ ɪ n1
n f μw n


( n 1
\ n

=0.


(36)


Therefore, the candidate equilibrium price is given by the solution of (36):

pe = c + —+ we + d + μw)
n

where b = yMah+ad+âw] 6and where Λh = αhδ N a.

Proposition 4 With congestion but without congestion pricing, there exists a
unique symmetric Nash equilibrium in prices and wages given by:

e   I Л I e∣∕d∣ wʌ n I δ N "2

p — c +    + w + μ + μ J i + b          (37)

Proof. See Appendix C. ■

Note that without congestion, the equilibrium price reduces to equation (17).
With congestion, there are two additional positive terms in the RHS. First the
marginal production cost is now c
+ Λh /n + we and contains a congestion term
translating the increased cost of intermediate deliveries. The second term is
related to the congestion created by shopping, commuting and intermediate
delivery traffic and represents the increased market power effect.

The markup (pe - c - Λh /n - we) now has two components. The first one
is the product/wage heterogeneity term (proportional to
(μd + μw)), as in the
non-congested case. The second term, represents the externality due to conges-
tion7 As discussed, congestion reduces the incentive to cut prices, and therefore,
increases equilibrium prices. This may explain why shops often lobby against
policy measures which aim to improve traffic conditions in general although a
firm individually will be in favour of local improvements of traffic, i.e. measures
which improve the accessability to.workers and consumers.

The short run equilibrium profit (see 35 and 37 is:

N δ αN 2

πe(s) = d + μw) (n-1) + s J - (F + S)         (38)

which is an increasing function of the congestion level.

6 Note than when κ =1, αb = α.

7The total cost is TC = αNte = αN Çt + δα-N^ . Therefore the externality, which is the
difference between the marginal cost and the average cost is equal to:
δα2= α (te t) .

17



More intriguing information

1. Poverty transition through targeted programme: the case of Bangladesh Poultry Model
2. Evaluating the Success of the School Commodity Food Program
3. The name is absent
4. Endogenous Determination of FDI Growth and Economic Growth:The OECD Case
5. The purpose of this paper is to report on the 2008 inaugural Equal Opportunities Conference held at the University of East Anglia, Norwich
6. AGRICULTURAL PRODUCERS' WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR REAL-TIME MESOSCALE WEATHER INFORMATION
7. Improving the Impact of Market Reform on Agricultural Productivity in Africa: How Institutional Design Makes a Difference
8. Individual tradable permit market and traffic congestion: An experimental study
9. Une Gestion des ressources humaines à l'interface des organisations : vers une GRH territoriale ?
10. Learning-by-Exporting? Firm-Level Evidence for UK Manufacturing and Services Sectors