Imperfect competition and congestion in the City



dgi(wi) -1
dwi


dPw

pw + gi(wi) - Wi - c - hPW]     = 0.

dwi

Substituting the expressions (34) and (33), the first-order condition, at the
symmetric candidate equilibrium reduces to:

Γμd h + Λd 1

Lμw y ' nd n


(pe - We


( n1Й + 1 + λw 1
∖ n / ∕         μw n

- c - Λh 2 ¢ ɪ n1
n f μw n


( n 1
\ n

=0.


(36)


Therefore, the candidate equilibrium price is given by the solution of (36):

pe = c + —+ we + d + μw)
n

where b = yMah+ad+âw] 6and where Λh = αhδ N a.

Proposition 4 With congestion but without congestion pricing, there exists a
unique symmetric Nash equilibrium in prices and wages given by:

e   I Л I e∣∕d∣ wʌ n I δ N "2

p — c +    + w + μ + μ J i + b          (37)

Proof. See Appendix C. ■

Note that without congestion, the equilibrium price reduces to equation (17).
With congestion, there are two additional positive terms in the RHS. First the
marginal production cost is now c
+ Λh /n + we and contains a congestion term
translating the increased cost of intermediate deliveries. The second term is
related to the congestion created by shopping, commuting and intermediate
delivery traffic and represents the increased market power effect.

The markup (pe - c - Λh /n - we) now has two components. The first one
is the product/wage heterogeneity term (proportional to
(μd + μw)), as in the
non-congested case. The second term, represents the externality due to conges-
tion7 As discussed, congestion reduces the incentive to cut prices, and therefore,
increases equilibrium prices. This may explain why shops often lobby against
policy measures which aim to improve traffic conditions in general although a
firm individually will be in favour of local improvements of traffic, i.e. measures
which improve the accessability to.workers and consumers.

The short run equilibrium profit (see 35 and 37 is:

N δ αN 2

πe(s) = d + μw) (n-1) + s J - (F + S)         (38)

which is an increasing function of the congestion level.

6 Note than when κ =1, αb = α.

7The total cost is TC = αNte = αN Çt + δα-N^ . Therefore the externality, which is the
difference between the marginal cost and the average cost is equal to:
δα2= α (te t) .

17



More intriguing information

1. Protocol for Past BP: a randomised controlled trial of different blood pressure targets for people with a history of stroke of transient ischaemic attack (TIA) in primary care
2. Why unwinding preferences is not the same as liberalisation: the case of sugar
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. Towards a Mirror System for the Development of Socially-Mediated Skills
6. Whatever happened to competition in space agency procurement? The case of NASA
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Place of Work and Place of Residence: Informal Hiring Networks and Labor Market Outcomes
10. The Trade Effects of MERCOSUR and The Andean Community on U.S. Cotton Exports to CBI countries