Imperfect competition and congestion in the City



dgi(wi) -1
dwi


dPw

pw + gi(wi) - Wi - c - hPW]     = 0.

dwi

Substituting the expressions (34) and (33), the first-order condition, at the
symmetric candidate equilibrium reduces to:

Γμd h + Λd 1

Lμw y ' nd n


(pe - We


( n1Й + 1 + λw 1
∖ n / ∕         μw n

- c - Λh 2 ¢ ɪ n1
n f μw n


( n 1
\ n

=0.


(36)


Therefore, the candidate equilibrium price is given by the solution of (36):

pe = c + —+ we + d + μw)
n

where b = yMah+ad+âw] 6and where Λh = αhδ N a.

Proposition 4 With congestion but without congestion pricing, there exists a
unique symmetric Nash equilibrium in prices and wages given by:

e   I Л I e∣∕d∣ wʌ n I δ N "2

p — c +    + w + μ + μ J i + b          (37)

Proof. See Appendix C. ■

Note that without congestion, the equilibrium price reduces to equation (17).
With congestion, there are two additional positive terms in the RHS. First the
marginal production cost is now c
+ Λh /n + we and contains a congestion term
translating the increased cost of intermediate deliveries. The second term is
related to the congestion created by shopping, commuting and intermediate
delivery traffic and represents the increased market power effect.

The markup (pe - c - Λh /n - we) now has two components. The first one
is the product/wage heterogeneity term (proportional to
(μd + μw)), as in the
non-congested case. The second term, represents the externality due to conges-
tion7 As discussed, congestion reduces the incentive to cut prices, and therefore,
increases equilibrium prices. This may explain why shops often lobby against
policy measures which aim to improve traffic conditions in general although a
firm individually will be in favour of local improvements of traffic, i.e. measures
which improve the accessability to.workers and consumers.

The short run equilibrium profit (see 35 and 37 is:

N δ αN 2

πe(s) = d + μw) (n-1) + s J - (F + S)         (38)

which is an increasing function of the congestion level.

6 Note than when κ =1, αb = α.

7The total cost is TC = αNte = αN Çt + δα-N^ . Therefore the externality, which is the
difference between the marginal cost and the average cost is equal to:
δα2= α (te t) .

17



More intriguing information

1. PERFORMANCE PREMISES FOR HUMAN RESOURCES FROM PUBLIC HEALTH ORGANIZATIONS IN ROMANIA
2. Langfristige Wachstumsaussichten der ukrainischen Wirtschaft : Potenziale und Barrieren
3. fMRI Investigation of Cortical and Subcortical Networks in the Learning of Abstract and Effector-Specific Representations of Motor Sequences
4. Pricing American-style Derivatives under the Heston Model Dynamics: A Fast Fourier Transformation in the Geske–Johnson Scheme
5. The Impact of Individual Investment Behavior for Retirement Welfare: Evidence from the United States and Germany
6. Higher education funding reforms in England: the distributional effects and the shifting balance of costs
7. Regional science policy and the growth of knowledge megacentres in bioscience clusters
8. Partner Selection Criteria in Strategic Alliances When to Ally with Weak Partners
9. Large Scale Studies in den deutschen Sozialwissenschaften:Stand und Perspektiven. Bericht über einen Workshop der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft
10. Concerns for Equity and the Optimal Co-Payments for Publicly Provided Health Care