|
_______________________________Free-entry eq |
uilibrium: ne_________________________________ | ||
|
No congestion |
Unpriced congestion |
Congestion & fine | |
|
ne___________________ |
3.7 |
5.014 |
4.407_______________ |
|
pe- we______________ |
0.54____________________ |
0.66_________________ |
0.65_________________ |
|
Welfare [hr]_______ |
10.565_________________ |
10.235 (reference) |
10.384 (reference) |
|
s (index) 26,309 |
∞_____________ |
100_________________ |
100_________________ |
|
____________________Optimized number of subcenters: n°(s); s = 100____________________ | |||
|
n°(s)_______________ |
2.7______________________ |
4.35_________________ |
3.78_________________ |
|
Welfare gain______ |
0.023___________________ |
0.004_______________ |
0.008_______________ |
|
_____________Optimized number of subcenters n° and optimized road size s°_____________ | |||
|
s° (index)__________ |
94_________________ |
67_________________ | |
|
n°________________ |
5.333________________ |
5.333________________ | |
|
Welfare gain wrt |
0.124 |
0.123 | |
Table 2 Numerical illustration for the Base case parameters: μw = μd = 0.2.
|
_______________________________Free-entry eq |
uilibrium: ne_________________________________ | ||
|
No congestion |
Unpriced congestion |
Congestion & fine | |
|
ne___________________ |
9 |
10.523 |
9.811______________ |
|
pe- we |
1.33____________________ |
1.46________________ |
1.45________________ |
|
Welfare [hr] |
11.882______________ |
11.588 (reference) |
11.728 (reference) |
|
s (index) 12,536 |
∞_____________ |
100_________________ |
100_________________ |
|
____________________Optimized number of subcenters: n°(s); s = 100____________________ | |||
|
n°(s)________________ |
_8______________________ |
9.83________________ |
8.99_______________ |
|
Welfare gain |
0.009________________ |
0.004_____________ |
~ 0_______________ |
|
_____________Optimized number of subcenters n° and optimized road size s°_____________ | |||
|
s° (index) |
66________________ |
47_______________ | |
|
n° |
16_________________ |
16_________________ | |
|
Welfare gain wrt |
0.629 |
0.631 | |
Table 3 Numerical illustration for the Base case parameters: μw = μd = 0.6.
More intriguing information
1. Outsourcing, Complementary Innovations and Growth2. Individual tradable permit market and traffic congestion: An experimental study
3. Reform of the EU Sugar Regime: Impacts on Sugar Production in Ireland
4. Disentangling the Sources of Pro-social Behavior in the Workplace: A Field Experiment
5. AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE PRODUCTION EFFECTS OF ADOPTING GM SEED TECHNOLOGY: THE CASE OF FARMERS IN ARGENTINA
6. The name is absent
7. Research Design, as Independent of Methods
8. The name is absent
9. The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke
10. The name is absent