Imperfect competition and congestion in the City



_______________________________Free-entry eq

uilibrium: ne_________________________________

No congestion

Unpriced congestion

Congestion & fine
toll_______________________

ne___________________

3.7

5.014

4.407_______________

pe- we______________

0.54____________________

0.66_________________

0.65_________________

Welfare [hr]_______

10.565_________________

10.235 (reference)

10.384 (reference)

s (index) 26,309

_____________

100_________________

100_________________

____________________Optimized number of subcenters: n°(s); s = 100____________________

n°(s)_______________

2.7______________________

4.35_________________

3.78_________________

Welfare gain______

0.023___________________

0.004_______________

0.008_______________

_____________Optimized number of subcenters n° and optimized road size s°_____________

s° (index)__________

94_________________

67_________________

________________

5.333________________

5.333________________

Welfare gain wrt
“reference”________

0.124

0.123

Table 2 Numerical illustration for the Base case parameters: μw = μd = 0.2.

_______________________________Free-entry eq

uilibrium: ne_________________________________

No congestion

Unpriced congestion

Congestion & fine
toll_______________________

ne___________________

9

10.523

9.811______________

pe- we

1.33____________________

1.46________________

1.45________________

Welfare [hr]

11.882______________

11.588 (reference)

11.728 (reference)

s (index) 12,536

_____________

100_________________

100_________________

____________________Optimized number of subcenters: n°(s); s = 100____________________

n°(s)________________

_8______________________

9.83________________

8.99_______________

Welfare gain

0.009________________

0.004_____________

~ 0_______________

_____________Optimized number of subcenters n° and optimized road size s°_____________

s° (index)

66________________

47_______________

16_________________

16_________________

Welfare gain wrt
“reference”________

0.629

0.631

Table 3 Numerical illustration for the Base case parameters: μw = μd = 0.6.



More intriguing information

1. Multimedia as a Cognitive Tool
2. The technological mediation of mathematics and its learning
3. Innovation in commercialization of pelagic fish: the example of "Srdela Snack" Franchise
4. The name is absent
5. Ventas callejeras y espacio público: efectos sobre el comercio de Bogotá
6. he Virtual Playground: an Educational Virtual Reality Environment for Evaluating Interactivity and Conceptual Learning
7. Parallel and overlapping Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Hepatitis B and C virus Infections among pregnant women in the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria
8. Structural Breakpoints in Volatility in International Markets
9. Temporary Work in Turbulent Times: The Swedish Experience
10. The growing importance of risk in financial regulation