APPENDIXES
A Proof of Proposition 1
It suffices to show that the profit function is quasi-concave. Since there exists a
candidate equilibrium, quasi-concavity is sufficient to guarantee that this candi-
date equilibrium is Nash. We prove below that at any extremum, the function
is concave.
At any extremum, the first-order condition is satisfied:
1 d∏i
N dwi
- (μW + 1) + (fi(wi) - wi - c) (1 μ^ ) Pw.
The corresponding second-order condition is:
1 μw d2πi
N Piw (1 - Piw) ' =0
I dwi
-2 μ μw+1 )+(fi(wi) - wi - c) (1 - 2Pw) μw
But, using the fist order condition, we get:
1 μw d2πi
NPiw (1 - Piw ) dw2∣d∏i =o
∣ dwi
d dd ∖ (μw + l´
-2 (μw>μ, (1 - 2Piw )
(μw+0 (-
2+
(1 - 2Pw ) ʌ
(1 - Piw ) Г
or
1 μw d2πi
NPwwdW2 I d∏i
I dwi
+0
<0
Therefore, any turning point, where dπei /dwi =0is such that it is a maximum.
As a consequence, the profit function is quasi-concave, and the symmetric can-
didate equilibrium is a Nash Equilibrium. Q.E.D.
B I.I.D. preferences
B.1 Computation of the candidate price equilibrium
• Labour market choices
The choice probabilities of subcenter i is given as before by:
Piw = Pr ob ©wi + μwγi ≥ wj + μwYj, j = 1...n} .
28
More intriguing information
1. Reputations, Market Structure, and the Choice of Quality Assurance Systems in the Food Industry2. Informal Labour and Credit Markets: A Survey.
3. The Context of Sense and Sensibility
4. Midwest prospects and the new economy
5. Trade Openness and Volatility
6. Initial Public Offerings and Venture Capital in Germany
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent