Modelling the health related benefits of environmental policies - a CGE analysis for the eu countries with gem-e3



16

For the calibration of the model these values need to be decomposed further by
distinguishing between the different economic agents (consumers, producers and
government) and between the different components of the MWTP (i.e., time cost, non-
separable health cost and separable cost component). The Appendix describes in more
detail how this is done. It is assumed that non-health impacts and mortality (except for
the linked medical expenditure) continue to be modelled as in the standard GEM-E3
model. Moreover, we assume that medical costs are subsidized by the government up to
80% and that approximately 42% of the time cost is borne by the consumers, while the
rest is borne by the production sectors. The results are given in Table 2.

Table 2: Detailed decomposition of the total damage of air pollution
(ECU/person/unit of ambient concentration)a

PM10 and
nitrates

PM2.5 and
sulphates

SO2

O3

Total damage

18.92

31.14

0.527

577

(100%)

(100%)

(100%)

(100%)

1) Total MWTPAmconsumers

16.88

25.28

0.485

5.60

of which:

(89.2%)

(81.2%)

(91.9%)

(95.4%)

a) Time costs consumers ( = w . θm)

0.64

1.06

0.001

0.13

(3.4%)

(3.4%)

(0.1%)

(2.2%)

b) Non-separable health costs consumers

3.06

2.54

0.012

2.74

(= Pmedβ 1,m / β2)

(16.1%)

(8.2%)

(2.2%)

(46.6%)

c) Separable costs consumers

13.18

21.68

0.472

2.73

(=ан,.0 . Yd)___________________________________

(69.7%)

(69.6%)

(89.6%)

(46.5%)

2) Productivity losses producers

0.85

1.41

0.001

0.18

(4.5%)

(4.5%)

(0.1%)

(3.0%)

3) Medical costs government

1.20

4.46

0.042

0.09

(6.4%)

(14.3%)

(8.0%)

(1.5%)

a units of ambient concentration: μg∕m3 for PM2.5, PM10, nitrates, sulphates, SO2; 6h ppb for O3
Source: ExternE (1995-2000), Friedrich and Bickel (2001) and own assumptions

The share of the total MWTP of the consumers (as formulated by equation (15))
in the total damage ranges between 81.2% and 95.4%, depending on the pollutant that is
considered. The rest of the damage is inflicted upon the production sectors and the



More intriguing information

1. Does Market Concentration Promote or Reduce New Product Introductions? Evidence from US Food Industry
2. On the Desirability of Taxing Charitable Contributions
3. Public-Private Partnerships in Urban Development in the United States
4. The name is absent
5. Determinants of Household Health Expenditure: Case of Urban Orissa
6. Qualification-Mismatch and Long-Term Unemployment in a Growth-Matching Model
7. A novel selective 11b-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 inhibitor prevents human adipogenesis
8. Large-N and Large-T Properties of Panel Data Estimators and the Hausman Test
9. Uncertain Productivity Growth and the Choice between FDI and Export
10. The name is absent
11. NATIONAL PERSPECTIVE
12. Mortality study of 18 000 patients treated with omeprazole
13. Auction Design without Commitment
14. The name is absent
15. Contribution of Economics to Design of Sustainable Cattle Breeding Programs in Eastern Africa: A Choice Experiment Approach
16. The name is absent
17. The name is absent
18. The name is absent
19. The name is absent
20. The name is absent