Human Development and Regional Disparities in Iran:A Policy Model



Table B3. Computed targets for all provinces and all indicators

Province

RCP20

FPENR

FSENR

INFS

MATS

PENR

SENR

R&DST

LF

LFIND

LFSER

Indicator LE

AL

RCPC

SFWA

SANA

1 Ardebil

66.0

68.9

1636.3

92.6

60.9

439.2

94.7

56.2

955.1

965.2

122.3

73.6

31.1

25.2

28.2

43.7

2 Booshehr

66.7

72.4

1702.3

94.1

67.3

474.0

95.8

60.7

958.2

965.1

118.4

78.9

38.9

25.0

25.2

49.8

3 Chahar Mahal B.

66.4

71.2

1633.8

95.6

63.7

410.5

96.2

58.7

956.7

966.1

119.4

77.1

34.9

26.5

33.6

40.5

4 East Azarbayjan

66.5

70.5

1748.4

93.3

65.4

495.0

95.4

57.4

957.3

968.7

121.8

76.0

33.9

25.8

29.0

44.4

5 Fars

67.8

76.4

1702.3

99.0

77.4

347.7

98.2

66.7

961.7

976.9

115.0

81.2

74.4

27.8

35.9

43.5

6 Gilan

68.9

73.7

1798.0

89.7

70.6

487.0

98.4

64.2

966.9

964.5

118.2

80.1

45.8

28.8

24.5

44.1

7 Hamedan

66.0

69.8

1621.5

94.0

61.8

443.6

95.4

58.7

955.2

965.2

121.2

75.5

30.6

25.6

30.3

42.5

8 Hormozgan

65.9

69.6

1642.0

93.5

64.5

459.7

94.9

56.2

954.9

962.5

122.1

76.1

30.8

24.7

26.9

46.7

9 Ilam

66.5

71.0

1657.4

94.7

66.7

493.6

95.1

59.1

957.3

966.1

119.8

79.6

36.3

24.7

26.7

48.6

10 Isfahan

70.3

72.6

1671

85.8

77.3

428

99.2

68.9

972.3

953.1

120.8

83.9

63.6

32.1

20.5

40.1

11 Kerman

66.2

71.3

1812.3

94.3

65.6

493.8

97.4

58.4

956.0

971.7

123.1

76.7

38.0

25.7

28.3

45.5

12 Kermanshah

66.4

71.5

1845.0

95.7

64.4

530.3

96.5

55.8

957.0

972.4

121.5

75.0

36.2

26.2

29.4

45.3

13 Khoozestan

66.5

71.0

1764.5

93.5

65.9

500.7

95.8

58.6

957.3

971.5

121.1

76.9

35.6

25.4

27.7

45.4

14 Khorasan

65.9

70.2

1647.2

94.1

64.7

464.8

95.2

57.3

954.8

963.1

122.2

77.3

30.3

25.0

27.3

46.0

15 Kohkilooyeh & B. A.

64.9

66.6

1465.8

91.3

52.4

344.3

94.3

51.6

950.5

949.5

125.9

75.1

23.0

24.1

27.7

40.5

16 Kordestan

64.4

64.1

1454.6

92.4

53.4

368.6

87.8

43.1

949.0

927.0

120.6

64.8

16.6

25.8

27.5

38.7

17 Lorestan

66.3

70.1

1689.8

93.9

63.6

489.0

95.5

57.1

956.4

966.7

121.6

77.0

32.1

25.2

27.8

46.1

18 Markasi

68.4

77.2

1716.3

98.7

77.4

357.0

98.4

67.4

964.3

979.2

115.1

81.7

83.9

27.9

37.3

43.6

19 Mazandaran

67.7

74.1

1732.4

94.7

71.6

419.4

97.9

64.8

961.8

972.2

118.4

80.8

58.0

27.4

29.8

44.6

20 Qom

69.1

80.1

3057.0

99.7

84.6

832.0

98.7

68.8

967.6

985.0

116.1

83.9

162.1

25.4

37.7

56.0

21 Semnan

69.0

79.0

1705.0

98.8

80.2

333.7

98.3

71.3

966.3

979.0

112.0

84.1

90.5

28.2

37.3

46.0

22 Sistan & B.*

62.9

54.6

1279.5

91.05

46.25

328

71.35

32.55

943.2

945.5

111.85

52.9

12.85

23.15

23.55

43.4

23 Tehran

70.5

84.7

3057

99.8

85.3

832

99.9

77.9

973.1

976.8

115.6

91.5

192.8

27.2

33.7

61.9

24 West Azarbayjan

65.7

66.9

1565.7

91.0

55.4

384.5

90.7

47.3

954.2

944.4

119.9

67.1

21.8

25.0

26.7

42.6

25 Yazd

69.4

78.7

1764.5

98.5

79.2

350.5

98.0

70.4

967.4

989.0

112.7

82.4

91.2

28.8

42.6

43.0

26 Zanjan

______________65.8

68.1

1572.2

92.9

59.9

417.3

94.4

55.1

954.5

958.9

122.0

72.9

29.5

25.2

29.4

41.8

* As this province is an outlier and does not have a close neighbour, its targets have been computed from its closest
province (West Azarbayjan) though the distance between them is above the minimum critical distance.

23



More intriguing information

1. Macroeconomic Interdependence in a Two-Country DSGE Model under Diverging Interest-Rate Rules
2. Testing Gribat´s Law Across Regions. Evidence from Spain.
3. EXPANDING HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE U.K: FROM ‘SYSTEM SLOWDOWN’ TO ‘SYSTEM ACCELERATION’
4. EU Preferential Partners in Search of New Policy Strategies for Agriculture: The Case of Citrus Sector in Trinidad and Tobago
5. The name is absent
6. An Estimated DSGE Model of the Indian Economy.
7. ESTIMATION OF EFFICIENT REGRESSION MODELS FOR APPLIED AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS RESEARCH
8. Feeling Good about Giving: The Benefits (and Costs) of Self-Interested Charitable Behavior
9. IMPACTS OF EPA DAIRY WASTE REGULATIONS ON FARM PROFITABILITY
10. The name is absent