Human Development and Regional Disparities in Iran:A Policy Model



Table B3. Computed targets for all provinces and all indicators

Province

RCP20

FPENR

FSENR

INFS

MATS

PENR

SENR

R&DST

LF

LFIND

LFSER

Indicator LE

AL

RCPC

SFWA

SANA

1 Ardebil

66.0

68.9

1636.3

92.6

60.9

439.2

94.7

56.2

955.1

965.2

122.3

73.6

31.1

25.2

28.2

43.7

2 Booshehr

66.7

72.4

1702.3

94.1

67.3

474.0

95.8

60.7

958.2

965.1

118.4

78.9

38.9

25.0

25.2

49.8

3 Chahar Mahal B.

66.4

71.2

1633.8

95.6

63.7

410.5

96.2

58.7

956.7

966.1

119.4

77.1

34.9

26.5

33.6

40.5

4 East Azarbayjan

66.5

70.5

1748.4

93.3

65.4

495.0

95.4

57.4

957.3

968.7

121.8

76.0

33.9

25.8

29.0

44.4

5 Fars

67.8

76.4

1702.3

99.0

77.4

347.7

98.2

66.7

961.7

976.9

115.0

81.2

74.4

27.8

35.9

43.5

6 Gilan

68.9

73.7

1798.0

89.7

70.6

487.0

98.4

64.2

966.9

964.5

118.2

80.1

45.8

28.8

24.5

44.1

7 Hamedan

66.0

69.8

1621.5

94.0

61.8

443.6

95.4

58.7

955.2

965.2

121.2

75.5

30.6

25.6

30.3

42.5

8 Hormozgan

65.9

69.6

1642.0

93.5

64.5

459.7

94.9

56.2

954.9

962.5

122.1

76.1

30.8

24.7

26.9

46.7

9 Ilam

66.5

71.0

1657.4

94.7

66.7

493.6

95.1

59.1

957.3

966.1

119.8

79.6

36.3

24.7

26.7

48.6

10 Isfahan

70.3

72.6

1671

85.8

77.3

428

99.2

68.9

972.3

953.1

120.8

83.9

63.6

32.1

20.5

40.1

11 Kerman

66.2

71.3

1812.3

94.3

65.6

493.8

97.4

58.4

956.0

971.7

123.1

76.7

38.0

25.7

28.3

45.5

12 Kermanshah

66.4

71.5

1845.0

95.7

64.4

530.3

96.5

55.8

957.0

972.4

121.5

75.0

36.2

26.2

29.4

45.3

13 Khoozestan

66.5

71.0

1764.5

93.5

65.9

500.7

95.8

58.6

957.3

971.5

121.1

76.9

35.6

25.4

27.7

45.4

14 Khorasan

65.9

70.2

1647.2

94.1

64.7

464.8

95.2

57.3

954.8

963.1

122.2

77.3

30.3

25.0

27.3

46.0

15 Kohkilooyeh & B. A.

64.9

66.6

1465.8

91.3

52.4

344.3

94.3

51.6

950.5

949.5

125.9

75.1

23.0

24.1

27.7

40.5

16 Kordestan

64.4

64.1

1454.6

92.4

53.4

368.6

87.8

43.1

949.0

927.0

120.6

64.8

16.6

25.8

27.5

38.7

17 Lorestan

66.3

70.1

1689.8

93.9

63.6

489.0

95.5

57.1

956.4

966.7

121.6

77.0

32.1

25.2

27.8

46.1

18 Markasi

68.4

77.2

1716.3

98.7

77.4

357.0

98.4

67.4

964.3

979.2

115.1

81.7

83.9

27.9

37.3

43.6

19 Mazandaran

67.7

74.1

1732.4

94.7

71.6

419.4

97.9

64.8

961.8

972.2

118.4

80.8

58.0

27.4

29.8

44.6

20 Qom

69.1

80.1

3057.0

99.7

84.6

832.0

98.7

68.8

967.6

985.0

116.1

83.9

162.1

25.4

37.7

56.0

21 Semnan

69.0

79.0

1705.0

98.8

80.2

333.7

98.3

71.3

966.3

979.0

112.0

84.1

90.5

28.2

37.3

46.0

22 Sistan & B.*

62.9

54.6

1279.5

91.05

46.25

328

71.35

32.55

943.2

945.5

111.85

52.9

12.85

23.15

23.55

43.4

23 Tehran

70.5

84.7

3057

99.8

85.3

832

99.9

77.9

973.1

976.8

115.6

91.5

192.8

27.2

33.7

61.9

24 West Azarbayjan

65.7

66.9

1565.7

91.0

55.4

384.5

90.7

47.3

954.2

944.4

119.9

67.1

21.8

25.0

26.7

42.6

25 Yazd

69.4

78.7

1764.5

98.5

79.2

350.5

98.0

70.4

967.4

989.0

112.7

82.4

91.2

28.8

42.6

43.0

26 Zanjan

______________65.8

68.1

1572.2

92.9

59.9

417.3

94.4

55.1

954.5

958.9

122.0

72.9

29.5

25.2

29.4

41.8

* As this province is an outlier and does not have a close neighbour, its targets have been computed from its closest
province (West Azarbayjan) though the distance between them is above the minimum critical distance.

23



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. The name is absent
3. Imputing Dairy Producers' Quota Discount Rate Using the Individual Export Milk Program in Quebec
4. Centre for Longitudinal Studies
5. Distribution of aggregate income in Portugal from 1995 to 2000 within a SAM (Social Accounting Matrix) framework. Modeling the household sector
6. Comparison of Optimal Control Solutions in a Labor Market Model
7. Computational Experiments with the Fuzzy Love and Romance
8. A Consistent Nonparametric Test for Causality in Quantile
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent