Table B3. Computed targets for all provinces and all indicators
Province |
RCP20 |
FPENR |
FSENR |
INFS |
MATS |
PENR |
SENR |
R&DST |
LF |
LFIND |
LFSER | |||||
Indicator LE |
AL |
RCPC |
SFWA |
SANA | ||||||||||||
1 Ardebil |
66.0 |
68.9 |
1636.3 |
92.6 |
60.9 |
439.2 |
94.7 |
56.2 |
955.1 |
965.2 |
122.3 |
73.6 |
31.1 |
25.2 |
28.2 |
43.7 |
2 Booshehr |
66.7 |
72.4 |
1702.3 |
94.1 |
67.3 |
474.0 |
95.8 |
60.7 |
958.2 |
965.1 |
118.4 |
78.9 |
38.9 |
25.0 |
25.2 |
49.8 |
3 Chahar Mahal B. |
66.4 |
71.2 |
1633.8 |
95.6 |
63.7 |
410.5 |
96.2 |
58.7 |
956.7 |
966.1 |
119.4 |
77.1 |
34.9 |
26.5 |
33.6 |
40.5 |
4 East Azarbayjan |
66.5 |
70.5 |
1748.4 |
93.3 |
65.4 |
495.0 |
95.4 |
57.4 |
957.3 |
968.7 |
121.8 |
76.0 |
33.9 |
25.8 |
29.0 |
44.4 |
5 Fars |
67.8 |
76.4 |
1702.3 |
99.0 |
77.4 |
347.7 |
98.2 |
66.7 |
961.7 |
976.9 |
115.0 |
81.2 |
74.4 |
27.8 |
35.9 |
43.5 |
6 Gilan |
68.9 |
73.7 |
1798.0 |
89.7 |
70.6 |
487.0 |
98.4 |
64.2 |
966.9 |
964.5 |
118.2 |
80.1 |
45.8 |
28.8 |
24.5 |
44.1 |
7 Hamedan |
66.0 |
69.8 |
1621.5 |
94.0 |
61.8 |
443.6 |
95.4 |
58.7 |
955.2 |
965.2 |
121.2 |
75.5 |
30.6 |
25.6 |
30.3 |
42.5 |
8 Hormozgan |
65.9 |
69.6 |
1642.0 |
93.5 |
64.5 |
459.7 |
94.9 |
56.2 |
954.9 |
962.5 |
122.1 |
76.1 |
30.8 |
24.7 |
26.9 |
46.7 |
9 Ilam |
66.5 |
71.0 |
1657.4 |
94.7 |
66.7 |
493.6 |
95.1 |
59.1 |
957.3 |
966.1 |
119.8 |
79.6 |
36.3 |
24.7 |
26.7 |
48.6 |
10 Isfahan |
70.3 |
72.6 |
1671 |
85.8 |
77.3 |
428 |
99.2 |
68.9 |
972.3 |
953.1 |
120.8 |
83.9 |
63.6 |
32.1 |
20.5 |
40.1 |
11 Kerman |
66.2 |
71.3 |
1812.3 |
94.3 |
65.6 |
493.8 |
97.4 |
58.4 |
956.0 |
971.7 |
123.1 |
76.7 |
38.0 |
25.7 |
28.3 |
45.5 |
12 Kermanshah |
66.4 |
71.5 |
1845.0 |
95.7 |
64.4 |
530.3 |
96.5 |
55.8 |
957.0 |
972.4 |
121.5 |
75.0 |
36.2 |
26.2 |
29.4 |
45.3 |
13 Khoozestan |
66.5 |
71.0 |
1764.5 |
93.5 |
65.9 |
500.7 |
95.8 |
58.6 |
957.3 |
971.5 |
121.1 |
76.9 |
35.6 |
25.4 |
27.7 |
45.4 |
14 Khorasan |
65.9 |
70.2 |
1647.2 |
94.1 |
64.7 |
464.8 |
95.2 |
57.3 |
954.8 |
963.1 |
122.2 |
77.3 |
30.3 |
25.0 |
27.3 |
46.0 |
15 Kohkilooyeh & B. A. |
64.9 |
66.6 |
1465.8 |
91.3 |
52.4 |
344.3 |
94.3 |
51.6 |
950.5 |
949.5 |
125.9 |
75.1 |
23.0 |
24.1 |
27.7 |
40.5 |
16 Kordestan |
64.4 |
64.1 |
1454.6 |
92.4 |
53.4 |
368.6 |
87.8 |
43.1 |
949.0 |
927.0 |
120.6 |
64.8 |
16.6 |
25.8 |
27.5 |
38.7 |
17 Lorestan |
66.3 |
70.1 |
1689.8 |
93.9 |
63.6 |
489.0 |
95.5 |
57.1 |
956.4 |
966.7 |
121.6 |
77.0 |
32.1 |
25.2 |
27.8 |
46.1 |
18 Markasi |
68.4 |
77.2 |
1716.3 |
98.7 |
77.4 |
357.0 |
98.4 |
67.4 |
964.3 |
979.2 |
115.1 |
81.7 |
83.9 |
27.9 |
37.3 |
43.6 |
19 Mazandaran |
67.7 |
74.1 |
1732.4 |
94.7 |
71.6 |
419.4 |
97.9 |
64.8 |
961.8 |
972.2 |
118.4 |
80.8 |
58.0 |
27.4 |
29.8 |
44.6 |
20 Qom |
69.1 |
80.1 |
3057.0 |
99.7 |
84.6 |
832.0 |
98.7 |
68.8 |
967.6 |
985.0 |
116.1 |
83.9 |
162.1 |
25.4 |
37.7 |
56.0 |
21 Semnan |
69.0 |
79.0 |
1705.0 |
98.8 |
80.2 |
333.7 |
98.3 |
71.3 |
966.3 |
979.0 |
112.0 |
84.1 |
90.5 |
28.2 |
37.3 |
46.0 |
22 Sistan & B.* |
62.9 |
54.6 |
1279.5 |
91.05 |
46.25 |
328 |
71.35 |
32.55 |
943.2 |
945.5 |
111.85 |
52.9 |
12.85 |
23.15 |
23.55 |
43.4 |
23 Tehran |
70.5 |
84.7 |
3057 |
99.8 |
85.3 |
832 |
99.9 |
77.9 |
973.1 |
976.8 |
115.6 |
91.5 |
192.8 |
27.2 |
33.7 |
61.9 |
24 West Azarbayjan |
65.7 |
66.9 |
1565.7 |
91.0 |
55.4 |
384.5 |
90.7 |
47.3 |
954.2 |
944.4 |
119.9 |
67.1 |
21.8 |
25.0 |
26.7 |
42.6 |
25 Yazd |
69.4 |
78.7 |
1764.5 |
98.5 |
79.2 |
350.5 |
98.0 |
70.4 |
967.4 |
989.0 |
112.7 |
82.4 |
91.2 |
28.8 |
42.6 |
43.0 |
26 Zanjan |
______________65.8 |
68.1 |
1572.2 |
92.9 |
59.9 |
417.3 |
94.4 |
55.1 |
954.5 |
958.9 |
122.0 |
72.9 |
29.5 |
25.2 |
29.4 |
41.8 |
* As this province is an outlier and does not have a close neighbour, its targets have been computed from its closest
province (West Azarbayjan) though the distance between them is above the minimum critical distance.
23
More intriguing information
1. Macroeconomic Interdependence in a Two-Country DSGE Model under Diverging Interest-Rate Rules2. Testing Gribat´s Law Across Regions. Evidence from Spain.
3. EXPANDING HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE U.K: FROM ‘SYSTEM SLOWDOWN’ TO ‘SYSTEM ACCELERATION’
4. EU Preferential Partners in Search of New Policy Strategies for Agriculture: The Case of Citrus Sector in Trinidad and Tobago
5. The name is absent
6. An Estimated DSGE Model of the Indian Economy.
7. ESTIMATION OF EFFICIENT REGRESSION MODELS FOR APPLIED AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS RESEARCH
8. Feeling Good about Giving: The Benefits (and Costs) of Self-Interested Charitable Behavior
9. IMPACTS OF EPA DAIRY WASTE REGULATIONS ON FARM PROFITABILITY
10. The name is absent