1 Introduction
Admittedly the recent Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) revolution
has favoured the development of numerous innovative workplace practices in most OECD
countries (see for example Osterman, 2004, for the US case, and Boucekkine and Crifo,
2007, for more recent empirical evidence for OECD countries). A view emerges as the
productivity gains from investing in ICT cannot be significant without an appropriate
evolution in the workplace organization towards more flexibility, which in turn is likely to
rise the demand for skilled labour. This view is advocated and tested for example in the
well-known paper of Bresnahan et al. (2002).
Table 1 illustrates this rising organizational flexibility following the ICT revolution.
Work organization inside firms evolved from specialization to multi-tasking, and flexible
forms of workplace organization have largely diffused in most OECD economies. For
example, the two thirds of American firms and 57% of German establishments now rely on
multi-tasking, and the proportion of workers involved in organizational changes increased
continuously (and even doubled) in Great Britain and France.
Table 1: Tasks and computer use in the EU (% of workers), 1991-2000
1991 |
1996 |
2000 | |
Job involving complex tasks |
57 |
56 | |
Job involving repetitive tasks |
23.3 |
16 |
15 |
Working with computers |
13.9 |
38 |
41 |
Source: European surveys on working conditions, European foundation for the
improvement of living and working conditions.
Parallel to this trend, we can also observe an increasing employment share of skilled
workers in ma jor OECD countries during the 1990s along with the dissemination of ICT,
as shown in Table 2 (additional evidence confirming this trend in other OECD countries
can be found in Boucekkine and Crifo, 2007).
Table 2: High-skilled (HS) ICT workers in the European Union and the United States,
Average annual employment growth (1995-01) (* = in 2001)
HS workers |
HS ICT-related |
Share of HS ICT workers | |
United States |
2.79 |
5.29 |
2.63 |
France |
1.67 |
7.11 |
2.05 |
Italy |
5.99 |
8.58 |
1.30 |
Belgium |
2.13 |
8.91 |
2.01 |
Germany |
1.66 |
9.41 |
1.90 |
Denmark |
3.08 |
9.49 |
2.58 |
EU |
2.79 |
10.11 |
2.01 |
United Kingdom |
1.37 |
12.63 |
____________2.60_______________ |
Source: OECD (July 2004) based on the Eurostat Labour Force Survey and the US
Current Population Survey, May 2003.
More intriguing information
1. Financial Markets and International Risk Sharing2. The Determinants of Individual Trade Policy Preferences: International Survey Evidence
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. Connectionism, Analogicity and Mental Content
6. Are class size differences related to pupils’ educational progress and classroom processes? Findings from the Institute of Education Class Size Study of children aged 5-7 Years
7. Changing spatial planning systems and the role of the regional government level; Comparing the Netherlands, Flanders and England
8. The Context of Sense and Sensibility
9. Spatial agglomeration and business groups: new evidence from Italian industrial districts
10. THE CHANGING RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS