Learning-by-Exporting? Firm-Level Evidence for UK Manufacturing and Services Sectors



Table 1: GBa turnover (£m) in 2003 based on FAME and ARD by size-bands

FAME___________ FAME

Size-bandb

Unweighted

%

Weighted

%

ARD

%

ARD

(1)

(2)

(3)

(2) ÷ (3)

<44

26.9

0.0

460.1

0.0

509.7

0.0

90.0

44 to 227

380.7

0.0

7,969.6

0.7

8,509.4

0.8

93.5

>227 to 1184

3,578.5

0.2

60,892.8

5.3

63,751.8

5.9

95.5

>1184 to 7244

49,683.9

2.4

198,417.1

17.4

200,988.3

18.5

98.7

>7244

1,988,609.3

97.4

874,543.9

76.5

812,157.0

74.8

107.5

All

2,042,279.4

100.0

1,142,283.4

100.0

1,085,916.2

100.0

105.0

a Unweighted FAME data covers the UK b Size-bands are in £’000 Source: ARD and FAME databases

Table 1 presents the results from weighting the FAME data. The unweighted data
from
FAME are dominated by the largest firms (defined as firms with turnover of £7.2
million or above) since this sub-group accounts for over 97% of total turnover.
Weighting the
FAME produces a distribution across size-bands that is comparable to
that obtained when using the
ARD. This is confirmed in the final column in Table 1,
which shows that the ratio of
FAME to ARD turnover by size-band is within a margin
of
±10%. There is a suggestion that even weighted, the FAME data slightly
underestimates the contribution of the smallest firms (and correspondingly
overestimates the importance of the largest firms), but these differences are not likely
to unduly impact on any statistical analysis undertaken using these weighted data.
16
All the subsequent statistical analyses are based on this weighted
FAME dataset.

of total FAME turnover. Note also, the ARD does not contain data for Northern Ireland but since this
region is rather small it will not have much of an effect in the weights used.

16 We have also undertaken a further check of the usefulness of the weighted data on exports
information (other than just turnover) by comparing it to information from the 2004 Community
Innovation Survey (
CIS4) that contains information on which establishments exported in 2004. Our
findings suggest that while there are differences across industries, the relative magnitudes of the
estimates of the percentage of firms that export for the two datasets are very similar. See Harris and Li
(2007) for details.

12



More intriguing information

1. Towards a Mirror System for the Development of Socially-Mediated Skills
2. The name is absent
3. MULTIPLE COMPARISONS WITH THE BEST: BAYESIAN PRECISION MEASURES OF EFFICIENCY RANKINGS
4. The Impact of Financial Openness on Economic Integration: Evidence from the Europe and the Cis
5. The Employment Impact of Differences in Dmand and Production
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. Opciones de política económica en el Perú 2011-2015
9. Long-Term Capital Movements
10. Governance Control Mechanisms in Portuguese Agricultural Credit Cooperatives