Learning-by-Exporting? Firm-Level Evidence for UK Manufacturing and Services Sectors



Table 4: Long-run ‘learning-by-exporting’ effect for certain UK industries, 1996-2004

______AGF

FBT

TCL

WPP

CRR

MET

ENG

OMF

IV model (GMM)

EXP_entry t+1

0.061

-0.013

0.066

0.678*

0.242

-0.004

0.112

-0.094

EXP_entry t

-0.012

_sksk
0.117**

0.173

-0.228

0.030

-0.043

0.278***

0.272***

EXP_entry t-1

-0.066

-0.019

-0.094

-0.238**

0.068

-0.052

_  _    _sksk

-0.215**

_ _ _ *

-0.084*

EXP_exit t+1

0.084

-0.126*

-0.284*

0.107

-0.186*

-0.264***

0.098

-0.068

EXP_exit t

0.133

-0.054

-0.072

0.118

_ _ .sksksk

-0.692***

0.120

-0.091

0.094

EXP_exit t-1

-0.447

-0.049

0.157

-0.236

0.399*

_ _ _sksksk
0.237***

-0.114*

0.055

EXP_both t+1

0.689***

-0.021

-0.086

0.076

-0.025

-0.072

-0.048

-0.045

EXP_both t

0.042

0.211**

-0.153

-0.013

-0.004

0.071

0.036

0.042

EXP_both t-1

0.260

sk

-0.104*

0.110

0.057

-0.017

-0.008

0.009

-0.055

No. of Obs.

1702

3065

2223

6903

4629

7075

9596

3731

No. of groups

508

741

530

1798

1107

1719

2252

948

Control function

EXP_entry t+1

0.074

-0.014

0.013

0.743**

0.256

-0.013

0.094

-0.102

EXP_entry t

-0.061

0.271**

0.298

0.390

-0.041

0.039

0.410*

0.353

EXP_entry t-1

-0.043

-0.013

-0.157

-0.329***

0.056

-0.065

-0.200*

-0.063

EXP_exit t+1

0.086

-0.108*

-0.272

0.127

sksk

-0.181**

_ .sksksk

-0.198***

0.043

-0.068

EXP_exit t

0.117

-0.257

-0.029

-0.433

-0.476

-0.001

-0.281

-0.066

EXP_exit t-1

-0.383

-0.015

0.174

-0.272**

0.295

_sksksk

0.215***

_ _ *

-0.102*

0.070

EXP_both t+1

0.693***

-0.054

-0.115

0.056

0.006

-0.053

-0.051

-0.051

EXP_both t

0.018

0.369**

-0.117

0.463**

-0.065

0.118

0.222

0.092

EXP_both t-1

0.283

-0.158*

0.103

0.035

0.001

-0.010

0.025

-0.045

λ1

0.009

-0.014

0.009

_   _ _ sksksk

-0.201***

0.109

-0.040

0.012

0.017

λ0

0.058

-0.240***

-0.014

0.352

0.015

0.007

-0.122*

-0.121

No. of Obs.

1702

3065

2223

6903

4629

7075

9596

3731

No. of groups

508

741

530

1798

1107

1719

2252

948

Matched sample

EXP_entry t+1

0.048

0.020

-0.043

__.sksk

0.533**

*
0.241
*

0.008

0.115

-0.063

EXP_entry t

0.009

0.093**

- _ - *
0.340*

-0.113

-0.001

-0.065

_ _ .sksksk

0.276***

0.278***

EXP_entry t-1

0.025

0.001

-0.031

-0.246***

0.082

-0.022

-0.201*

-0.136*

EXP_exit t+1

0.036

-0.092*

-0.349*

0.097

-0.192*

-0.281***

0.092

-0.067

EXP_exit t

-0.006

-0.077

0.039

0.120

___.sksksk

-0.729***

__ .sk

0.176*

-0.075

0.108

EXP_exit t-1

-0.415

-0.042

0.200

-0.254*

0.436*

.sksksk

0.212***

-0.106*

0.052

EXP_both t+1

0.694

-0.040

-0.091

0.086

-0.006

-0.072

-0.039

-0.058

EXP_both t

0.026

_ _sksk
0.185**

-0.057

-0.002

0.001

0.070

0.035

0.038

EXP_both t-1

_  _ -SkSkSk

0.309***

-0.063

0.205

0.064

-0.012

-0.010

-0.006

-0.088

No. of Obs.

682

2564

2100

5178

4525

6386

3731

3443

No. of groups_________

261

685

509

1526

1089

1610

948

890

Notes: Refer to Table 2 for details of industry group codes. The 2-step GMM system estimator in STATA 9 is used
using
FAME data in conjunction with weights; the instrument set includes lagged values of the RHS variables
in the model as well as
ln Ageit and Intangit . Standard errors are obtained using the ‘delta’ method. See

Table 3 for details of estimation of other variables. ***/**/* significant at the 1%/5%/10% level.

28



More intriguing information

1. Transgression et Contestation Dans Ie conte diderotien. Pierre Hartmann Strasbourg
2. Educational Inequalities Among School Leavers in Ireland 1979-1994
3. A production model and maintenance planning model for the process industry
4. Agricultural Policy as a Social Engineering Tool
5. On Social and Market Sanctions in Deterring non Compliance in Pollution Standards
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. Cyclical Changes in Short-Run Earnings Mobility in Canada, 1982-1996
9. Solidaristic Wage Bargaining
10. The name is absent