The name is absent



test. In addition, the Hansen test is not subject to criticism regarding both the CUSUM and CUSUM
of squares proposed by Brown, Durbin, and Evans (1975). In particular, the former has been
criticized for being a trivial test to detect instability in the intercept of a model; while the latter
suffers from poor asymptotic power. The test proposed by Hansen has local optimal power. The

variables in the linear model (5) must be weakly dependent process, that is they cannot contain any
deterministic or stochastic trend10. A linear model returns efficient estimates when the disturbance
covariance between noise and the explanatory variables is necessary to presume the model is
correctly specified
E(xtI et)= 0 . The Hansen test statistics are based on the cumulative sums of the
aforementioned first-order conditions. The test is used to check for both individual (Li) and joint
(Lc) parameter stability. Asymptotic critical values for the individual stability test are provided by
Hansen (1992)11. The null hypothesis of joint parameter constancy implies that the first-order
conditions are zero-mean, i.e. the cumulative sum tends to be distributed around zero. The non-
standard distribution is tabulated by Hansen (1992)12.

term is a zero mean process


E(et xt ) = 0 with constant variance E(e? ) = σ2


. In addition, zero


There are three explanatory variables in the Campbell-Shiller equation (5) including both the
constant and the errors variance. Test results are displayed in Table 4. The calculated statistics
associated to the expectations hypothesis equation are extremely high for any couple of maturities
(
n, m); the null hypothesis of parameter constancy is decisively rejected. The Hansen test thus
suggests clear parameter instability.

Hansen Test

(120, 3)

Coeff

Li

(60, 3)

coeff

Li

(36, 3)

coeff

Li

spread
var

0.608

5.608

8,108

3.828

spread
var

0.678

4.104

4.460

2.851

spread
var

0.489

3.214

2.769

2.250

joint Lc

23.572

joint Lc

12.966

joint Lc

7.789

(24, 3)

coeff

Li

(12, 3)

coeff

Li

(6, 3)

coeff

Li

spread
var

0.392

2.152

1.374

1.819

spread
var

0.329

0.836

0.390

1.551

spread
var

0.074

0.283

0.206

1.195

joint Lc

5.279

joint Lc

3.114

joint Lc

2.209

sample jan64-sep02

Table 4

10 As shown in Section 3 all the variables are covariance stationary.

11 The 5% critical value is 0.47; while the 10% is 0.353. Large values of the test statistics implies a violation of the first-
order conditions, and thus lead to the rejection of the null hypothesis of parameter stability.

12 At 5% significance level the critical value is 1.01, while the 10% critical value is 0.846. The null hypothesis of joint
parameter stability is rejected if the test statistics exceeds the critical values.

14



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Confusion and Reinforcement Learning in Experimental Public Goods Games
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. Julkinen T&K-rahoitus ja sen vaikutus yrityksiin - Analyysi metalli- ja elektroniikkateollisuudesta
7. INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS AND GROUP PROCESSES
8. The name is absent
9. Analyzing the Agricultural Trade Impacts of the Canada-Chile Free Trade Agreement
10. The name is absent
11. Global Excess Liquidity and House Prices - A VAR Analysis for OECD Countries
12. Cultural Neuroeconomics of Intertemporal Choice
13. The name is absent
14. The effect of classroom diversity on tolerance and participation in England, Sweden and Germany
15. Improving Business Cycle Forecasts’ Accuracy - What Can We Learn from Past Errors?
16. Assessing Economic Complexity with Input-Output Based Measures
17. Knowledge and Learning in Complex Urban Renewal Projects; Towards a Process Design
18. Income Growth and Mobility of Rural Households in Kenya: Role of Education and Historical Patterns in Poverty Reduction
19. Qualifying Recital: Lisa Carol Hardaway, flute
20. Markets for Influence