FISCAL CONSOLIDATION AND DECENTRALISATION: A TALE OF TWO TIERS



Table 10: Composition of adjustments during lone sub-central consolidation attempts25
(each shown as % of GDP)

Expenditure

Current

Expenditure            of which:

Goods and          Wage Bill         Transfers and

Services                                   subsidies

Capital
Expenditure

0.05                -0.01                0.04                0.02

(0.76)                 (0.19)                 (0.44)                 (0.32)

-0.12

(0.25)

Revenue

Taxation, of which:

Total                 Own-Taxes

Non-Tax Revenues

Grants

0.25                     0.21

(0.57)                       (0.50)

0.04

(0.18)

0.29

(0.62)

Relative to the pattern observed during general government consolidations, changes in
revenues appear to be relied upon more extensively in lone sub-central consolidations. The
revenue raising comes from both autonomous sources (i.e. “own” tax revenues and to a far
lesser extent non-tax revenues), as well as higher grants allocations from central
26
government.

In summary, there are clear distinctions between changes in sub-central revenues and
expenditures that occur as part of a general fiscal adjustment and those that occur during an
independent consolidation implemented by the sub-central tier. When central government
consolidates it may force sub-central governments to cut particular expenditures, such as the
wage bill, perhaps in part through centrally agreed pay settlements or through the grant
system. In contrast, when sub-central governments consolidate alone, it would appear that
brunt of the adjustment is made in own tax revenues and capital expenditure, sometimes
assisted by increases in grant allocations from the central tier.

5: Conclusions

In this paper we have examined fiscal consolidation attempts across a range of OECD
countries. We have verified a result from the existing literature that successful general

25 Standard deviations are given in brackets, but given the relatively small degrees of freedom and
reasonable measure of ‘success’ we do not make a distinction between successful and unsuccessful
consolidations.

26 The figures for changes in grants also contain two substantial positive outliers, which match those in the current
expenditure calculations above. In fact these sub-central consolidations were conducted in conjunction with a

21



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Gender and headship in the twenty-first century
3. Who is missing from higher education?
4. The name is absent
5. Monetary Policy News and Exchange Rate Responses: Do Only Surprises Matter?
6. The economic doctrines in the wine trade and wine production sectors: the case of Bastiat and the Port wine sector: 1850-1908
7. Behaviour-based Knowledge Systems: An Epigenetic Path from Behaviour to Knowledge
8. The InnoRegio-program: a new way to promote regional innovation networks - empirical results of the complementary research -
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent