FISCAL CONSOLIDATION AND DECENTRALISATION: A TALE OF TWO TIERS



To better capture relative success, and to discriminate across a range of alternative outcomes
following a consolidation attempt, we make use of the more refined success index in
definition 3. In the remainder of the paper we present our results based on both definitions 2
and 3.

Definition 3:

An index of success/failure, SI, is classified as follows:

SI = 3

if the level of the debt to GDP ratio falls by at least 5 percentage points in the
three years following a consolidation attempt (equivalent to “success” in
definition 2).

SI = 2

if the level of the debt to GDP ratio stabilises (within half a percentage point
tolerance of the initial level rate) or if it decreases by less than 5 percentage
points over the three years following a consolidation attempt.

SI = 1

if the growth rate of the debt to GDP ratio over the three years following a
consolidation attempt is less than that observed in the three years prior to the
consolidation attempt (here we use a tolerance of 10% of the initial growth
rate).

SI = 0

if none of the above apply the attempt is classified as a failed consolidation
attempt.

3.4 Consolidation Attempts of Sub-Central Governments

It seems likely that the majority of consolidation episodes are instigated at the level of central
government. However, our dataset also allows us to identify consolidation attempts made by
the sub-central tier of government. Given the smaller scale of sub-central budgets it is
necessary to adapt definition 1 for use at the sub-central level:

Definition 4:

A period of sub-central fiscal consolidation is deemed to have occurred in a given year if the
weighted discretionary fiscal impulse is greater than or equal to +1.5 percent of GDP or if the
weighted discretionary fiscal impulse exceeds 1.25 percent of GDP for two consecutive years.

The weight applied in each case is the sub-central tier’s percentage share of general
government expenditure.

We allow for two-year consolidations at the sub-central level given the relatively smaller size
of this tier and the likelihood that in practice such consolidations are likely to be more gradual
than at the centre11.

11 We have allowed for only single year sub-central consolidations and full results are available on request.
Degrees of freedom become relatively small and though our results remain robust, obtaining statistical inference
with such limited observations is more difficult.



More intriguing information

1. Wirkt eine Preisregulierung nur auf den Preis?: Anmerkungen zu den Wirkungen einer Preisregulierung auf das Werbevolumen
2. Top-Down Mass Analysis of Protein Tyrosine Nitration: Comparison of Electron Capture Dissociation with “Slow-Heating” Tandem Mass Spectrometry Methods
3. National curriculum assessment: how to make it better
4. THE MEXICAN HOG INDUSTRY: MOVING BEYOND 2003
5. Public Debt Management in Brazil
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Female Empowerment: Impact of a Commitment Savings Product in the Philippines
10. How Offshoring Can Affect the Industries’ Skill Composition
11. The name is absent
12. Computational Batik Motif Generation Innovation of Traditi onal Heritage by Fracta l Computation
13. The demand for urban transport: An application of discrete choice model for Cadiz
14. The name is absent
15. The name is absent
16. Reversal of Fortune: Macroeconomic Policy, International Finance, and Banking in Japan
17. American trade policy towards Sub Saharan Africa –- a meta analysis of AGOA
18. The name is absent
19. Improving the Impact of Market Reform on Agricultural Productivity in Africa: How Institutional Design Makes a Difference
20. Who is missing from higher education?