FISCAL CONSOLIDATION AND DECENTRALISATION: A TALE OF TWO TIERS

To better capture relative success, and to discriminate across a range of alternative outcomes
following a consolidation attempt, we make use of the more refined success index in
definition 3. In the remainder of the paper we present our results based on both definitions 2
and 3.

Definition 3:

An index of success/failure, SI, is classified as follows:

3.4 Consolidation Attempts of Sub-Central Governments

It seems likely that the majority of consolidation episodes are instigated at the level of central
government. However, our dataset also allows us to identify consolidation attempts made by
the sub-central tier of government. Given the smaller scale of sub-central budgets it is
necessary to adapt definition 1 for use at the sub-central level:

Definition 4:

A period of sub-central fiscal consolidation is deemed to have occurred in a given year if the
weighted discretionary fiscal impulse is greater than or equal to +1.5 percent of GDP or if the
weighted discretionary fiscal impulse exceeds 1.25 percent of GDP for two consecutive years.

The weight applied in each case is the sub-central tier’s percentage share of general
government expenditure.

We allow for two-year consolidations at the sub-central level given the relatively smaller size
of this tier and the likelihood that in practice such consolidations are likely to be more gradual
than at the centre¹¹.

¹¹ We have allowed for only single year sub-central consolidations and full results are available on request.
Degrees of freedom become relatively small and though our results remain robust, obtaining statistical inference
with such limited observations is more difficult.

<<   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   >>

More intriguing information