FISCAL CONSOLIDATION AND DECENTRALISATION: A TALE OF TWO TIERS



attempts, as classified using definition 2 above. Of a total of 61 attempted consolidations, 22
(36%) are classified as successful; 27 general government consolidation attempts involve
consolidation at the sub-central tier, of which 12 (44%) are judged successful. There are
several sustained periods of consolidation (including the UK 1996-1998, Ireland 1987-1989
and Sweden 1981-1984) and it is noticeable that successful consolidations tend to occur close
to, i.e. within a two to three year period of, other attempted consolidations.

Using our more refined success index, 22 general government consolidation attempts achieved
the toughest criterion of a fall in the debt to GDP ratio that exceeded 5 percentage points (SI =
3); 12 resulted in a stable debt to GDP ratio or a decline of less than 5 percentage points (SI =
2); 17 attempts resulted in a reduction in the growth rate of the debt to GDP ratio, so satisfied
our weakest definition of success (SI = 1) and the remaining 10 of the 61 consolidation
attempts fell in the failed category (SI = 0).

Alesina and Perotti [1995] suggested that where a relatively large number of consolidation
attempts in a given country end in failure this may be the result of ill-judged ‘stop-go’ policies.
To explore this hypothesis we have recorded the number of discretionary fiscal expansions
undertaken by each country in the final row of Table 2.

Table 2: Consolidation attempts, success rates and discretionary expansions12

Sweden

Ireland

Finland

Norway

Canada

Netherlands

Belgium

Denmark

Australia

Spain

Germany

France

Austria

USA

ra
о
I—

Number of
consolidation
attempts

9

7

6

5

5

5

5

4

3

3

3

3

2

1

0

61

Success
index (SI)

1.9

2.9

1.7

0.6

1.6

1.8

1.6

1.5

2.7

2

2.3

1

1

0

0

1.5

Number of
discretionary
expansions

2

6

4

6

4

2

2

1

3

2

1

2

2

3

1

41

A relatively large number of both consolidation attempts and discretionary expansions took
place in a number of countries including Denmark, the UK, Ireland, Finland and Norway.
However, these countries are not uniformly associated with low rates of success rates of
consolidation attempts: Denmark and the UK record relatively high success rates; but
conversely Finland and Norway combine a relatively large number of both consolidation
attempts and discretionary expansions took place in a number of countries including Denmark,

12 We identified discretionary fiscal expansions in a symmetric manner to consolidations. That is, a discretionary
expansion was deemed to have occurred if the fiscal impulse was at least 1.5% of GDP.

10



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. SAEA EDITOR'S REPORT, FEBRUARY 1988
3. TECHNOLOGY AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT: THE CASE OF PATENTS AND FIRM LOCATION IN THE SPANISH MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS INDUSTRY.
4. Forecasting Financial Crises and Contagion in Asia using Dynamic Factor Analysis
5. Imperfect competition and congestion in the City
6. THE USE OF EXTRANEOUS INFORMATION IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF A POLICY SIMULATION MODEL
7. The name is absent
8. Gender and aquaculture: sharing the benefits equitably
9. Knowledge and Learning in Complex Urban Renewal Projects; Towards a Process Design
10. The name is absent