attempts, as classified using definition 2 above. Of a total of 61 attempted consolidations, 22
(36%) are classified as successful; 27 general government consolidation attempts involve
consolidation at the sub-central tier, of which 12 (44%) are judged successful. There are
several sustained periods of consolidation (including the UK 1996-1998, Ireland 1987-1989
and Sweden 1981-1984) and it is noticeable that successful consolidations tend to occur close
to, i.e. within a two to three year period of, other attempted consolidations.
Using our more refined success index, 22 general government consolidation attempts achieved
the toughest criterion of a fall in the debt to GDP ratio that exceeded 5 percentage points (SI =
3); 12 resulted in a stable debt to GDP ratio or a decline of less than 5 percentage points (SI =
2); 17 attempts resulted in a reduction in the growth rate of the debt to GDP ratio, so satisfied
our weakest definition of success (SI = 1) and the remaining 10 of the 61 consolidation
attempts fell in the failed category (SI = 0).
Alesina and Perotti [1995] suggested that where a relatively large number of consolidation
attempts in a given country end in failure this may be the result of ill-judged ‘stop-go’ policies.
To explore this hypothesis we have recorded the number of discretionary fiscal expansions
undertaken by each country in the final row of Table 2.
Table 2: Consolidation attempts, success rates and discretionary expansions12
|
Sweden |
zɔ |
Ireland |
Finland |
Norway |
Canada |
Netherlands |
Belgium |
Denmark |
Australia |
Spain |
Germany |
France |
Austria |
USA |
ra | |
|
Number of |
9 |
7 |
6 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
61 |
|
Success |
1.9 |
2.9 |
1.7 |
0.6 |
1.6 |
1.8 |
1.6 |
1.5 |
2.7 |
2 |
2.3 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1.5 |
|
Number of |
2 |
6 |
4 |
6 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
41 |
A relatively large number of both consolidation attempts and discretionary expansions took
place in a number of countries including Denmark, the UK, Ireland, Finland and Norway.
However, these countries are not uniformly associated with low rates of success rates of
consolidation attempts: Denmark and the UK record relatively high success rates; but
conversely Finland and Norway combine a relatively large number of both consolidation
attempts and discretionary expansions took place in a number of countries including Denmark,
12 We identified discretionary fiscal expansions in a symmetric manner to consolidations. That is, a discretionary
expansion was deemed to have occurred if the fiscal impulse was at least 1.5% of GDP.
10
More intriguing information
1. PEER-REVIEWED FINAL EDITED VERSION OF ARTICLE PRIOR TO PUBLICATION2. Spectral density bandwith choice and prewightening in the estimation of heteroskadasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrices in panel data models
3. Industrial Employment Growth in Spanish Regions - the Role Played by Size, Innovation, and Spatial Aspects
4. School Effectiveness in Developing Countries - A Summary of the Research Evidence
5. Can a Robot Hear Music? Can a Robot Dance? Can a Robot Tell What it Knows or Intends to Do? Can it Feel Pride or Shame in Company?
6. RETAIL SALES: DO THEY MEAN REDUCED EXPENDITURES? GERMAN GROCERY EVIDENCE
7. Mergers and the changing landscape of commercial banking (Part II)
8. Existentialism: a Philosophy of Hope or Despair?
9. Strengthening civil society from the outside? Donor driven consultation and participation processes in Poverty Reduction Strategies (PRSP): the Bolivian case
10. Should Local Public Employment Services be Merged with the Local Social Benefit Administrations?