Heterogeneity of Investors and Asset Pricing in a Risk-Value World



sion making. There are papers that build on overconfidence to explain the
amount of trading
[Daniel, Hirshleifer and Subrahmanyam 1998, Odean 1998
b]. Another stream of research is based on the value function part of prospect
theory
[Barberis, Huang and Santos 2000, Barberis and Huang 2000, Hong
and Stein 1999, Zuchel and Weber 2000] and tries to understand the ob-
served correlation in stock returns. We will base our work on yet another
body of knowledge from psychology, i.e., the understanding of what people
perceive when they talk about the riskiness of an asset. This enables us to
come up with a risk-value framework which is behaviorally based and better
describes peoples’ risk judgments than EU.

Risk is at the center of most theories about asset valuation. It is therefore
essential to understand what investors perceive the risk of an asset to be.
Investorst risk judgments should serve as a basis of asset valuation. Therefore
results of psychological research on risk perception and risk judgment are
essential for asset valuation.

This paper starts from risk-value models. In a risk-value model, risk and
value are taken as primitives. To evaluate an alternative, the decision maker
first separately derives value and risk of this alternative. Then value and
risk are combined into an overall preference. While value is always defined
as the expected outcome, the essential question relates to the measure of
risk. Markowitz also used a risk-value model with risk being measured by
the variance of the outcome.

Quite a number of attempts have been made to come to a more realistic
concept of risk.1

New results suggest that risk perception can be modelled as the expected
value of the transformed deviation of the outcome from a benchmark. The
1The inclusion of third moments of the return distributions, see Kraus and Litzenberger
(1976), or taking semi-variance as a measure of risk, see Bawa and Lindenberg (1977) are
examples of early attempts which, however, are not based on psychological research.



More intriguing information

1. The English Examining Boards: Their route from independence to government outsourcing agencies
2. Geography, Health, and Demo-Economic Development
3. Howard Gardner : the myth of Multiple Intelligences
4. The name is absent
5. Tissue Tracking Imaging for Identifying the Origin of Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmias: A New Role of Cardiac Ultrasound in Electrophysiology
6. Impact of Ethanol Production on U.S. and Regional Gasoline Prices and On the Profitability of U.S. Oil Refinery Industry
7. DISCRIMINATORY APPROACH TO AUDITORY STIMULI IN GUINEA FOWL (NUMIDA MELEAGRIS) AFTER HYPERSTRIATAL∕HIPPOCAMP- AL BRAIN DAMAGE
8. Quality practices, priorities and performance: an international study
9. For Whom is MAI? A theoretical Perspective on Multilateral Agreements on Investments
10. Comparison of Optimal Control Solutions in a Labor Market Model