Heterogeneity of Investors and Asset Pricing in a Risk-Value World



Since fO, it follows that e < e and hence

ebε < elε,   ^ ε,

which contradicts the budget constraint (5). Therefore inequality (22)
must be true.

Second, we consider an increase in Rf so that e1 changes to ebo. Then η
changes to aoη. Hence the sharing constant decreases if inequality (22) holds
with
a and b being replaced by ao and bo. Therefore the same method by
which the first part of Lemma 1 has been proven can be applied here.

Appendix B: Proof of Proposition 2

a) Sufficiency: Suppose that F(e) is a quadratic function. Then f (e) =
a + be. Hence (17) implies linear relative sharing rules for two investors i and
j. Therefore all absolute rules are also linear.

b) Necessity: Differentiate (15) with respect to ε; this yields

ʃ//ʌ λdei
f (e) * =   ■/

(25)


Now suppose a linear absolute sharing rule for every investor: e = ai +
βi ε, so that β~ = βi. Then it follows from (25) for any two investors i and j

f (êis) η. = f> (êj£') ηl.' ’   ^ ε'

(26)


37



More intriguing information

1. Human Rights Violations by the Executive: Complicity of the Judiciary in Cameroon?
2. The name is absent
3. The Composition of Government Spending and the Real Exchange Rate
4. The name is absent
5. Education and Development: The Issues and the Evidence
6. Forecasting Financial Crises and Contagion in Asia using Dynamic Factor Analysis
7. The name is absent
8. The Effects of Reforming the Chinese Dual-Track Price System
9. The name is absent
10. Olive Tree Farming in Jaen: Situation With the New Cap and Comparison With the Province Income Per Capita.