Industrial districts, innovation and I-district effect: territory or industrial specialization?



Research_______________

District effect (differential above the mean)___________

_____________________________significantly improves firm efficiency ÷ median -2.01

Soler (2000)

Benefits/active: above the mean in the 4 sectors
considered

Productivity (added value/worker): above the mean in 3
sectors (doubtful in furniture)____________________________

Hernandez and Soler
(2003)

Efficiency

- Furniture: -0.20 (statistically non-significant)

- Ceramic tiles: 71%___________________________________

Brasili and Ricci (2003)

- ROI: between -37% and 28%

- ROE: between 31% and 280%

- Productivity: between -13% and 53%

- Technical efficiency: between -14% and 37%_________

Cainelli and De Liso
(2003)

Change in value added in simple ratios: non-innovative
firms (42%) and innovative firms (35%)

Change in value added in econometric regressions
(innovative and non-innovative firms): 16%_____________

Becchetti et al. (2007)

- Exports per worker: 79%

- Value added per worker: 37%

- Leverage: 119%

- Return on investment: -36%

- Return on equity: - 162%

- Return on assets: 253%_______________________________

Botelho and Hernandez
(2007)

- Benefits per establishment: 137%

- Productivity (added value/worker): 108%

- Efficiency: 28%_____________________________________

Competitiveness/Exports______________________________________________________

Costa and Viladecans
(1999)

Competitiveness (exports/sales):

- Positive differential to specialized LPS in 12 out of 21
industries
÷ median: 75%

- Negative in 9 industries^ median: -58%_____________

Becchetti and Rossi
(2000)

Competitiveness:

- Probability of being an exporter: 5%

- Export intensity (export/sales): between 179% and

228%___________________________________

Bronzini (2000)

Competitiveness (exports/jobs): 70% of aggregated
manufacturing. and statistically significant in 11 out of
17 manufacturing industries____________________________

Gola and Mori (2000)

Revealed competitive advantages (X/X+M): β = 0.0034
and statistically significant_________________________________

Innovation___________________________________________________________________

Santarelli (2004)

Number of patents by firm:

- 1986-1990: 82%

- 1990-1995: - 52%__________________________________

Muscio (2006)

Product innovation ÷ probability of being an innovative
firm: 14.4%___________________________________________

Boix and Galletto (2008)

Innovation (patents per employee): 47%_______________



More intriguing information

1. Ongoing Emergence: A Core Concept in Epigenetic Robotics
2. The name is absent
3. Forecasting Financial Crises and Contagion in Asia using Dynamic Factor Analysis
4. EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES
5. ¿Por qué se privatizan servicios en los municipios (pequeños)? Evidencia empírica sobre residuos sólidos y agua.
6. ISSUES AND PROBLEMS OF IMMEDIATE CONCERN
7. The name is absent
8. Cross border cooperation –promoter of tourism development
9. Olfactory Neuroblastoma: Diagnostic Difficulty
10. An institutional analysis of sasi laut in Maluku, Indonesia