Research_______________ |
District effect (differential above the mean)___________ |
_____________________________significantly improves firm efficiency ÷ median -2.01 | |
Soler (2000) |
Benefits/active: above the mean in the 4 sectors Productivity (added value/worker): above the mean in 3 |
Hernandez and Soler |
Efficiency - Furniture: -0.20 (statistically non-significant) - Ceramic tiles: 71%___________________________________ |
Brasili and Ricci (2003) |
- ROI: between -37% and 28% - ROE: between 31% and 280% - Productivity: between -13% and 53% - Technical efficiency: between -14% and 37%_________ |
Cainelli and De Liso |
Change in value added in simple ratios: non-innovative Change in value added in econometric regressions |
Becchetti et al. (2007) |
- Exports per worker: 79% - Value added per worker: 37% - Leverage: 119% - Return on investment: -36% - Return on equity: - 162% - Return on assets: 253%_______________________________ |
Botelho and Hernandez |
- Benefits per establishment: 137% - Productivity (added value/worker): 108% - Efficiency: 28%_____________________________________ |
Competitiveness/Exports______________________________________________________ | |
Costa and Viladecans |
Competitiveness (exports/sales): - Positive differential to specialized LPS in 12 out of 21 - Negative in 9 industries^ median: -58%_____________ |
Becchetti and Rossi |
Competitiveness: - Probability of being an exporter: 5% - Export intensity (export/sales): between 179% and 228%___________________________________ |
Bronzini (2000) |
Competitiveness (exports/jobs): 70% of aggregated |
Gola and Mori (2000) |
Revealed competitive advantages (X/X+M): β = 0.0034 |
Innovation___________________________________________________________________ | |
Santarelli (2004) |
Number of patents by firm: - 1986-1990: 82% - 1990-1995: - 52%__________________________________ |
Muscio (2006) |
Product innovation ÷ probability of being an innovative |
Boix and Galletto (2008) |
Innovation (patents per employee): 47%_______________ |
Industrial districts, innovation and I-district effect: territory or industrial specialization?
More intriguing information
1. Do imputed education histories provide satisfactory results in fertility analysis in the Western German context?2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. Road pricing and (re)location decisions households
6. The name is absent
7. Notes on an Endogenous Growth Model with two Capital Stocks II: The Stochastic Case
8. Do Decision Makers' Debt-risk Attitudes Affect the Agency Costs of Debt?
9. Globalization, Divergence and Stagnation
10. The name is absent
11. SOME ISSUES IN LAND TENURE, OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL IN DISPERSED VS. CONCENTRATED AGRICULTURE
12. Cultural Neuroeconomics of Intertemporal Choice
13. The name is absent
14. The Response of Ethiopian Grain Markets to Liberalization
15. The name is absent
16. The name is absent
17. I nnovative Surgical Technique in the Management of Vallecular Cyst
18. From Aurora Borealis to Carpathians. Searching the Road to Regional and Rural Development
19. ISSUES AND PROBLEMS OF IMMEDIATE CONCERN
20. The name is absent