Industrial districts, innovation and I-district effect: territory or industrial specialization?



Research_______________

District effect (differential above the mean)___________

_____________________________significantly improves firm efficiency ÷ median -2.01

Soler (2000)

Benefits/active: above the mean in the 4 sectors
considered

Productivity (added value/worker): above the mean in 3
sectors (doubtful in furniture)____________________________

Hernandez and Soler
(2003)

Efficiency

- Furniture: -0.20 (statistically non-significant)

- Ceramic tiles: 71%___________________________________

Brasili and Ricci (2003)

- ROI: between -37% and 28%

- ROE: between 31% and 280%

- Productivity: between -13% and 53%

- Technical efficiency: between -14% and 37%_________

Cainelli and De Liso
(2003)

Change in value added in simple ratios: non-innovative
firms (42%) and innovative firms (35%)

Change in value added in econometric regressions
(innovative and non-innovative firms): 16%_____________

Becchetti et al. (2007)

- Exports per worker: 79%

- Value added per worker: 37%

- Leverage: 119%

- Return on investment: -36%

- Return on equity: - 162%

- Return on assets: 253%_______________________________

Botelho and Hernandez
(2007)

- Benefits per establishment: 137%

- Productivity (added value/worker): 108%

- Efficiency: 28%_____________________________________

Competitiveness/Exports______________________________________________________

Costa and Viladecans
(1999)

Competitiveness (exports/sales):

- Positive differential to specialized LPS in 12 out of 21
industries
÷ median: 75%

- Negative in 9 industries^ median: -58%_____________

Becchetti and Rossi
(2000)

Competitiveness:

- Probability of being an exporter: 5%

- Export intensity (export/sales): between 179% and

228%___________________________________

Bronzini (2000)

Competitiveness (exports/jobs): 70% of aggregated
manufacturing. and statistically significant in 11 out of
17 manufacturing industries____________________________

Gola and Mori (2000)

Revealed competitive advantages (X/X+M): β = 0.0034
and statistically significant_________________________________

Innovation___________________________________________________________________

Santarelli (2004)

Number of patents by firm:

- 1986-1990: 82%

- 1990-1995: - 52%__________________________________

Muscio (2006)

Product innovation ÷ probability of being an innovative
firm: 14.4%___________________________________________

Boix and Galletto (2008)

Innovation (patents per employee): 47%_______________



More intriguing information

1. Do imputed education histories provide satisfactory results in fertility analysis in the Western German context?
2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. Road pricing and (re)location decisions households
6. The name is absent
7. Notes on an Endogenous Growth Model with two Capital Stocks II: The Stochastic Case
8. Do Decision Makers' Debt-risk Attitudes Affect the Agency Costs of Debt?
9. Globalization, Divergence and Stagnation
10. The name is absent
11. SOME ISSUES IN LAND TENURE, OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL IN DISPERSED VS. CONCENTRATED AGRICULTURE
12. Cultural Neuroeconomics of Intertemporal Choice
13. The name is absent
14. The Response of Ethiopian Grain Markets to Liberalization
15. The name is absent
16. The name is absent
17. I nnovative Surgical Technique in the Management of Vallecular Cyst
18. From Aurora Borealis to Carpathians. Searching the Road to Regional and Rural Development
19. ISSUES AND PROBLEMS OF IMMEDIATE CONCERN
20. The name is absent