CAPACITY AND ASYMMETRIES IN MONETARY POLICY
25
References
[1] Abarez-Lois, P.P. (2000): “Asymmetries in the Capacity-Inflation Trade-Off”, mimeo, De-
partament d’Economia, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona.
[2] Andolfatto, D., Hendry, S. Moran, K and Zhang, G. (2000): “Persistent Liquidity Effects
Following a Change in Monetary Policy Regime”, mimeo, Bank of Canada.
[3] Bernanke, B. Gertler, M. and Gilchrist, S. (1998): “The Financial Accelerator in a Quanti-
tative Business Cycle Framework”, NBER W.P. 6455.
[4] Burnside, C. and Eichembaun, M. (1996): “Factor Hoarding and the Propagation OfBusiness
Cycle Shocks”. American Economic Review, Vol. 86, pp. 1157-1174.
[5] Christiano, L. (1991): “Modelling the Liquidity Effect of a Monetary Shock”. Federal Reserve
Bank of Minneapolis. Quarterly Review, Winter.
[6] Christiano, L. (1998): “Solving Equilibrium Models by a Method of Undetermined Coeffi-
cients”, mimeo, Northwestern University.
[7] Christiano, L., Eichenbaum, M. (1995): “Liquidity Effects, Monetary Policy and the Business
Cycle”. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol 27, No. 2, pp. 1113-36.
[8] Christiano, L., Eichenbaum, M. and Evans, C. (1997): Sticky Prices and Limited Participa-
tion Models of Money: A Comparison”, European Economic Review, Vol. 41, pp. 1201-1249.
[9] Christiano, L., Eichenbaum, M. and Evans, C. (1998): “Modeling Money”. NBER W.P. 6371.
[10] Cook, D. (1999): “Real Propagation of Monetary Shocks: Dynamic Complementaries and
Capital utilization”. Macroeconomic Dynamics.
[11] Cooley, T. and Hansen, G. and Prescott, E. (1995): “Equilibrium Business Cycles with Idle
Resources”. Economic Theory, Vol. 6, pp. 35-49.
[12] Cover, J. (1992): “Asymmetric Effects of Positive and Negative Money-Supply Shocks”, Quar-
terly Journal of Economics, Vol 107, pp. 1260-1282.
[13] Dupasquier, Ch. and Ricketts, N. (1997): “Non-Linearities in the Output Inflation Relation-
ship” , mimeo, Bank of Canada.
[14] Enders, W. and Granger, C.W.J. (1998): “Unit-Root Tests and Asymmetric Adjustment with
an Example Using the Term Structure of Interest Rates”, Journal of Business and Economic
Statistics, Vol 16, pp. 304-311.
[15] Fagnart, J., Licandro, O. and Portier, F (1999): “Firm Heterogeneity, Capacty Utilization
and the Business Cycle”. Review of Economic Dynamics1Vol. 2, pp. 433-455.
[16] Finn, M. (1996): “A Theory of the Capacity Utilization/Inflation Relationship”. Federal
Reserve Bank of Richmond. Economic Quarterly. Volume 82/3. Summer 1996.
[17] Fuerst, T. (1992): “Liquidity, Loanable Funds and Real Activity”. Journal of Monetary
Economics. Vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 3-24. ”
[18] Goodfriend, M. and King, R. (1997): “The New Noeclassical Synthesis and the Role of Mon-
etary Policy”, NBER Macroeconomic Annual. Cambridge MIT Press.
[19] Green, J. (1980): “On the Theory of Effective Demands”, The Economic Journal, vol. 90,
pp. 341-353.
[20] Karras, G. (1996): “Are the Output Effects OfMonetary Policy Asymmetric? Evidence from
a Sample of European Countries”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 58, pp.
. . 267-78∙ . .
[21] Lucas, R. E. Jr. (1990): Liquidity and Interest Rates . Journal of Economic Theory. Vol.
_ 50, n<>2, pp. 237-264. . `
[22] Nobay, A.R. and Peel, D.A. (2000): Optimal Monetary Policy with a Non-Lmear Phillips
Curve”. Economics Letters, Vol. 67, pp. 159-164.”
[23] Svensson, L.E. (1980): “Effective Demands and Stochastic Rationing”, Review of Economic
_ Studies, Vol. XLVII, pp. 339-355.
[24] Weise, C. (1999): The Asymmetric Effects of Monetary Policy: A Nonlinear Vector Autore-
gression Approach”. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol. 31, no. 1, February.
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The Nobel Memorial Prize for Robert F. Engle
3. Non-causality in Bivariate Binary Panel Data
4. Financial Market Volatility and Primary Placements
5. The name is absent
6. Financial Markets and International Risk Sharing
7. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
8. Commitment devices, opportunity windows, and institution building in Central Asia
9. Response speeds of direct and securitized real estate to shocks in the fundamentals
10. The name is absent